Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 18, 2015
This is another one of those stories where your brain just sort of shuts down because it is incapable of processing it.
Most stories are those sorts of stories these days though, so it is really just par for the course.
This is actual real life.
I’m serious.
A senior judge has ruled a child molester was rightly given a tougher than normal sentence because his victims were Asian and so suffered more from his crimes.
This is now the “chosen people” doctrine being directly applied to the immigrants.
You can draw a direct comparisson here with the way Jews talk about the Holodomor. In the Holodomor, at least six million people were systematically murdered, but it isn’t as bad as the supposed Jewish Holocaust specifically because the victims weren’t Jewish. Foxman has literally said this.
Jamal Muhammed Raheem-ul-Nasir was jailed for seven years at Leeds Crown Court last year for sex attacks on two girls, aged nine and 14.
You’ll note that one of these is actually a pedophilic rape and the other is just a rape of a minor.
I am frankly fed-up with the media referring to sex with or rape of pubescent girls as “pedophilia.” The British media is especially guilty of this.
The technical definition of “pedophile” is someone with a sexual attraction to girls or boys who are prepubescent. As Wikipedia tells us “Pedophilia or paedophilia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children, generally age 11 years or younger.”
And yet the media is now trying to redefine this, on its own.
The roots of this, from my research, are in the desire to paint the Catholic Church abuse scandals as “pedophilic” instead of simply normal homosexual exploitation of vulnerable young men (almost all of the boys in these cases are 13 or older). Though it has other benefits to the Jews as well.
But that is a whole other issue.
But the paedophile took the case to appeal, with his lawyers complaining that his sentence was unfairly inflated and ‘excessive’.
Seven years for raping a 9-year-old is “excessive.”
We used to execute people for this. After a very, very short trial.
This part alone is insane. But of course, it gets more insane.
Senior judge Mr Justice Walker has now thrown out those arguments after hearing that the victims’ families feared they would struggle to find future husbands because of the abuse.
The move has been criticised by children’s charity the NSPCC, who insist justice should be blind to the race of victims.
Is this children’s charity racist? They should probably be investigated.
Nasir, 32, was convicted of two counts of sexual assault on a child under 13 and four counts of sexual activity with a child and handed the prison term in December last year.
The judge who jailed him, Sally Cahill QC, specifically said that the fact the victims were Asian had been factored in as an ‘aggravating feature’ when passing sentence.
Oh, the judge was a woman. What a huge and gigantic surprise.
And of course, this sets a precedent.
That brown lives matter more than White. Even in the case of little girls.
She stated that the victims and their families had suffered particular ‘shame’ in their communities because of what had happened to them.
Additionally there were cultural concerns that the girls’ future prospects of being regarded as a good catch for arranged marriages might be damaged.
Lawyers for Nasir, of Liversedge, West Yorkshire, argued at London’s Criminal Appeal Court that his sentence had been unfairly inflated.
“Inflated”?
What is the normal sentence in Britain for raping a 9-year-old?
Obviously, this 7 years is longer than whatever the standard is.
How is that even possible?
But their complaints were rejected by Mr Justice Walker, who said: ‘The victims’ fathers were concerned about the future marriage prospects for their daughters.
‘Judge Cahill was having particular regard to the harm caused to the victims by this offending.
‘That harm was aggravated by the impact on the victims and their families within this particular community.’
But what if they are actually doing racism against the rapist himself?
No, no. That is a misconception.
The argument that Ul Nasir was given a longer sentence due to his own ‘ethnic and religious origin’ was based on ‘a misconception’, he added.
But the racist child protectors are still sour.
But an NSPCC spokesman said: ‘British justice should operate on a level playing field and children need to be protected irrespective of cultural differences.
‘Regardless of race, religion, or gender, every child deserves the right to be safe and protected from sexual abuse, and the courts must reflect this. It is vital that those who commit these hideous crimes are punished to the full limit of the law.’
And there we get at the heart of the matter.
It is not that this brown person is getting a more severe sentence because the victims were brown – it is that brown people who abuse White girls get lesser sentences because their victims are White.
Is Britain suffering a shortage of torches and pitchforks?
Or are British men just utter pussies?
Don’t answer that.
The question is rhetorical.
But did you guys know you used to be this:
It could be inspirational to read the Wikipedia entry of Sir Richard Burton.
