Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
January 21, 2017
Generally speaking, privatization is bad. Putting banks, large companies, utilities and other strategic sectors that are “too big to fail” in the hands of unaccountable individuals usually ends up being a scam where capitalists and Jews socialize losses while privatizing profits.
But under the guise of “conservatism”, Trump is promising to take a big old scissor to Schlomo’s schnoz of Poz, while not touching services people need like Medicare and Social Security. This is yet another huge yet subtle development.
Donald Trump is ready to take an ax to government spending.
Staffers for the Trump transition team have been meeting with career staff at the White House ahead of Friday’s presidential inauguration to outline their plans for shrinking the federal bureaucracy, The Hill has learned.
The departments of Commerce and Energy would see major reductions in funding, with programs under their jurisdiction either being eliminated or transferred to other agencies. The departments of Transportation, Justice and State would see significant cuts and program eliminations.
The Corporation for Public Broadcasting would be privatized, while the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities would be eliminated entirely.
Overall, the blueprint being used by Trump’s team would reduce federal spending by $10.5 trillion over 10 years.
…
Trump vowed during the campaign not to cut Medicare and Social Security, a pledge that Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.), his pick to head the Department of Health and Human Services, told lawmakers in testimony Wednesday has not changed.…
The Heritage blueprint used as a basis for Trump’s proposed cuts calls for eliminating several programs that conservatives label corporate welfare programs: the Minority Business Development Agency, the Economic Development Administration, the International Trade Administration and the Manufacturing Extension Partnership. The total savings from cutting these four programs would amount to nearly $900 million in 2017.
At the Department of Justice, the blueprint calls for eliminating the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Violence Against Women Grants and the Legal Services Corporation and for reducing funding for its Civil Rights and its Environment and Natural Resources divisions.At the Department of Energy, it would roll back funding for nuclear physics and advanced scientific computing research to 2008 levels, eliminate the Office of Electricity, eliminate the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and scrap the Office of Fossil Energy, which focuses on technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Under the State Department’s jurisdiction, funding for the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Paris Climate Change Agreement and the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are candidates for elimination.
I can’t say I like the cuts to environmental protections, but all the other ones outweigh that.
The most important cuts are the cultural ones, the National Endowment of the Arts (NEA), National Endowment for the Humanities, and PBS are all platforms of pure anti-white and anti-normal hatred . In most cases I support public subsidization of arts and culture, but what these agencies produce under the auspices of Jews and queers is putrid trash.
Let’s look at some of the achievements of these agencies.
National Endowment of the Arts
Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ, a crucifix submerged in urine paid for and displayed by our tax dollars.
Robert Mapplethorpe’s The Perfect Moment (Photograph Exhibit) (there are far worse images, including blatant child pornography, people being urinated on, and a close up of Robert Mapplethorpe putting a dildo up his butt)
There’s more where this came from. There is too much depravity financed by the NEA to go into all of it. The problem in America and in the art scene in general isn’t that there are no more budding Da Vinci’s and El Grecos, but that both private capitalists (The Jew Guggenheim, etc) and public coffers subsidize garbage like the above even though nobody finds it moving or beautiful.
Pulling money out of this will at least neutralize some of it, or force Jews to put up more of their own money. It’s a win-win.
National Endowment for the Humanities
This department marks federal funds for content on the same frequency as the aforementioned art branch. The NEH even has an entire department dedicated to studying “Jewish history” , promoting the Holocaust lie, and lavishing all types of no-strings cash on anti-white academics.
Current projects financed by this department include programs like “White Privilege: The Other Side Of Racial Inequality,” “True Colors: Out Youth Theater” which states its goal is “LGBT youth using art for social change,” most of those who are awarded medals and grants by this department tend to line up with the ideology of Cultural Marxism.
If you think that “radical” student organizing on campus is some independent phenomenon, if you dig deep into their groups you will often find a trail of money leading back to the federal government, or NGOs who partner with the state. This will become obvious after the NEH is abolished, the marked decrease in left-wing campus activity will expose the self-described revolutionaries as a sham.
PBS
The Public Broadcasting Service has in recent decades declined into a platform used exclusively by Jewish ideologues and their fellow travelers. As a public corporation, PBS ought to maintain neutrality or give air time and space to both sides of the debate, but one look at their election-time coverage of Trump will reveal a highly partisan editorial line that competes with the New York Times and Washington Post in blatant slant.
Whether it’s kids shows or evening programming, PBS aggressively promotes concepts like “gender fluidity,” “White Privilege,” feminism, and probably has projected enough film propaganda about the “Holocaust” to fill Auschwitz’s Olympic Sized swimming pool.
If Trump succeeds in eviscerating these three departments, the culture will slowly begin to shift in the other direction. While we must keep vigilant with Trump and make sure he does what he said he would, so far he is exceeding expectations on multiple fronts. Does he realize what he’s doing? I would posit that under the guise of “small government conservatism,” Trump is actually acutely aware of what is happening on some level, and is looking to mitigate this.