Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 5, 2017
So wait.
What was the point of Brexit then?
Economics?
RT:
Prime Minister Theresa May has indicated that EU migrants could continue flowing into the UK for years – even after Britain leaves the European Union in 2019.
May said free movement may linger in the first couple of years after Brexit, as businesses and governments will need time to adjust while the final deal with the EU is implemented.
Speaking to reporters during her trip to the Middle East, May ruled out stripping EU migrants of their right to free movement during the post-Brexit transitional period.
“If you think about it, once we’ve got the deal, once we’ve agreed what the new relationship will be for the future, it will be necessary for there to be a period of time when businesses and governments are adjusting systems and so forth, depending on the nature of the deal.
“What is crucial for the British public, what was part of the vote that they took last year, was that they want to ensure that we have control of our borders and control of our immigration,” she said, stressing “that’s exactly what we will do when we come out of the European Union,” as quoted by the BBC.
However, UKIP leader Paul Nuttall snapped back, saying the PM’s remarks set off “alarm bells.”
“By voting to leave the EU, the British people asked the government to reduce the high levels of immigration that see a city the size of Hull and Newcastle come to the UK each year.
“The fact that the Tories won’t even specify how long the period of open-door immigration will continue after we have left the EU sets alarm bells ringing,” he said, as reported in the Telegraph.
This is friggin nuts.
Really.
The entire reason the British voted for Brexit was immigration.
And look, this isn’t just about the Polish economic migrants (though it is about them) – it’s about the fact that wacky old Merkel (or Schulz) is going to start handing out German passports to the “Syrian refugees.”
Democracy is such a stupid joke.
The one time the people actually get a chance to vote for something and do vote for it, the government is just like “yeeeaaaahhh, about that…”
Give me an authoritarian dictator any day.
He’s held accountable to the people for his actions and he doesn’t have a gigantic body of shills surrounding him making demands on him.
If “democracy” were to be translated directly to “will of the people embodied in government,” then “authoritarian dictatorship” would hands down be the most “democratic” form of government of all.
A dictator can’t just do whatever he wants in the way a democracy can, because a dictator is where the buck stops.
