CNN: Richard Spencer’s NPI is Basically ISIS

Zeiger
Daily Stormer
November 27, 2016

Leaked footage from the NPI after-party.

There are people who devote their careers to a sophisticated alchemical process: that of transmuting Islamic terror attacks into political capital to censor nationalist groups.

The “logic” is something like this: “Moslems are blowing us up. They do it because of their ideology. Nationalists also have an ideology. Therefore they’re also terrorists.”

confused

Well, you gotta admire their gall, at least.

After the initial flurry of coverage, Richard Spencer seemed to drop out of the news cycle. But it seems the media was merely regrouping and readjusting their angle.

He is now literally ISIS.

screenshot-from-2016-11-26-11-38-06

No, seriously, they headed an article about terrorism with a clip of Richard Spencer.

CNN:

What constitutes terrorism? The answer is using the threat of, or actual violence, as a means towards a political end.

The last decades’ notoriousness of terrorist attacks driven by Islamist extremist ideologies, coupled with the lack of constancy in defining terrorism, has not only prompted the rise of widespread societal anti-Muslim animosity, but also restricted public understanding of the term.

More importantly, it has served to neglect the emergence of an equally dangerous extremist ideology and similar terrorist attacks: far-right inspired attacks.

*Cough*

europolstatsterrorism-in-europe-right-versus-left-wing

And that’s just in terms of “political” attacks in the EU.

If we look at Islamic attacks the world over, these tiny numbers are put into perspective:

_80365550_terror_fatalities_countries_624

Thousands of Islamic attacks compared with a handful of right-wing attacks.

So it isn’t especially surprising that people equate the term “terrorist” with “Islam” (and, I would assume, Alan Rickman in the first Diehard movie).

The consequences of such neglect have been severe. Beyond the rapid upsurge of anti-Muslim bigotry, the resultant public discourse has exposed disastrous double standards, revealing that subconsciously many people are on some level incapable of cognitively processing that terrorism comes in different forms, beyond Islamist terrorism.

I wonder why the author of this article could be pushing this notion that we need to focus away from Moslems and instead start cracking down on nationalists?

daily-stormer_999912

Oh.

Why are we listening to this infiltrator explaining to us that we need to stop worrying about his tribe of terrorists and instead censor our own patriots?

He needs to be shipped straight back to Camelstan or wherever he comes from.

Both far-right and Islamist extremism are driven by dehumanizing, hate-promoting political ideologies, seeking to cleanse society of the “significant other” with disparate beliefs. In the aftermath of the Cox murder, Mair has publicly been labeled everything from a Nazi to a “Right Wing nut.” If an extremist claims to be executing non-believers and shouts “Allahu Akbar,” how should we react?

Good question.

How do Moslems react to Islamic terrorism?

muslim-man-shows-off-his-dance-moves-to-the-crowd-breaking-out-in-song

Maybe you should start preaching your “anti-terrorism” in your own land, Haji.

Another example of narrow perceptions is reflected in discussions about the UK’s “Prevent” strategy — designed to prevent ideological terrorist attacks in the UK — which has been widely labeled as anti-Muslim, and which some people believe (incorrectly) ferments Islamist extremism. Yet, the fact is that in certain regions of the UK, more referrals to the Prevent strategy’s deradicalization program, Channel, have been of far-right extremists rather than Islamist extremists.

What a surprise.

A program passed under the pretext of fighting Islamic terrorism is actually used to shut down right-wing activists.

Nobody could have predicted it.

jewish question

In any case, the lesson to be learned here is that it’s impossible to play the “respectable” route. The media doesn’t care how ridiculous they make themselves look. They’ll literally bring out some Moslem scumbag to tell you that soft-spoken nationalists like Spencer are just as bad as ISIS and Al-Qaeda.

But that’s fine.

In 2016, “respectability” isn’t worth anything anymore. You can be called a ruffian, a racist, a mysoginist and an anti-Semite and still get elected President of the United States.

So don’t sweat it.