Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
March 18, 2018
No wonder these thots are running amok. Ya’ll cowards don’t even patrol em’.
We have a skank epidemic in this country, and yet the authorities do nothing, letting them destroy society willy-nilly with their thothery.
For once, one of these skanks was caught red-handed engaging in wanton slut-behavior, and was about to get what was coming to her: the full force of the law.
But the damn judge bitched out at the last minute, preferring to engage in boomer-tier white knighting instead.
Sigh.
A southern Minnesota judge dismissed a child pornography charge against a 14-year-old girl who sent an explicit image of herself to a boy over Snapchat, saying that using the state’s child pornography statute to prosecute the girl produces “an absurd” result.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota made a redacted version of the decision public Friday, saying the ruling by Rice County District Judge John Cajacob sends a message that prosecuting teens for sending explicit images of themselves isn’t the intent of Minnesota’s child pornography law.
“Isn’t the intent of the law?”
Wew.
I haven’t seen a boomer smile like that since Woodstock!
Who the hell cares what the “intent of the law” is, whatever that means.
We need more thots on the sex-offender registry – and preferably, in jail – if we’re ever going to get these sluts under control. Until there’s a law for putting girls who send pictures of their junk on snapchat in a scold’s bridle, we need to be using whatever works.
According to court documents, the girl, who is not being identified because of her age, sent an image to a boy last fall and it was saved and shared with others. After a classmate reported it to police, prosecutors charged the girl with one count of felony dissemination of pornographic work.
THOTS TO PRISON!
Thot = patrolled. Chad approves.
In his Feb. 20 ruling, Cajacob wrote that Minnesota’s child pornography statute is designed to protect children from victimization, and that using it to punish the girl for sending explicit images of herself “produces an absurd, unreasonable, and unjust result that utterly confounds the stated purpose of the statute.”
Punishing skanks for being skanks is “absurd, unreasonable and unjust?”
Are you fucking kidding me?
What kind of faggotry is this?
*Laughs boomerishly*
We need a complete shutdown of boomers and white knights in the judiciary until we can figure out what’s going on.
Defense attorney John Hamer said he was thrilled the judge ended “the unabashed state-sponsored victim-shaming the prosecution engaged in.” A message left with the Rice County attorney wasn’t immediately returned Friday.
>Implying the skank was the victim here.
No, you retard.
The victim is civilization itself. And, to a lesser extent, the young guys who have to deal with these sluts.
Cajacob also wrote that the severe penalties if convicted — including a mandatory 10 years on the sex offender registry — suggest the statute targets adults who abuse children, not teens who sext each other. He said it’s absurd when a teen who sends a picture to another teen is punished as harshly as an adult who films himself performing sex acts with a minor.
I agree. Pedophiles should just be shot – after a fair trial, of course. But 10 years on the sex-offender registry for being an Instagram whore sounds about right.
“The punishment is vastly disproportionate to this girl’s ‘crime,’” Cajacob wrote. “This Court cannot see how subjecting (the girl) to registering as a sexual offender would protect her or teach her anything but that the justice system is cruel and unjust. The idea that heavy-handed enforcement of pornography laws is going to help these misguided, struggling teens is itself absurd.”
This white-knight cuckoldry is making me physically sick.
If this is the level of human material we’ve got protecting our civilization, we’re going to need a major overhaul.
We need a new breed of judges.
“Instagram whore? 5 years in the iso-cube.”
