Cucked RINOs Opposing Trump’s Brilliant Economic Nationalism

Zeiger
Daily Stormer
December 7, 2016

john mccain chi minh traitor

This Viet Cong Collaborator believes strongly in free-market principles.

The Republican party has a problem. A big problem.

And that problem is that it’s filled with non-Republicans. We call those people “RINO’s” (Republicans in name only).

These are the basic principles of the Republican party:

  1. Stopping these kikes.
  2. Restoring traditional values.
  3. Promoting the interests of White Americans.
  4. Nationalism.
  5. Opposition to democracy.

So what’s with all these shills like John McCain, Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy who are going on and on about “muh free trade” and “muh Hispanic conservatives”?

63589080

You might be a Jew tool, too.

A purge is in order here.

Time Magazine:

In a major early hurdle to Donald Trump’s trade agenda, Republicans indicated on Monday they are not ready to support his proposed tariff on U.S. companies that leave the country, reopening old rifts between the President-elect and his own party.

Trump repeated on Sunday morning a campaign promise to set a 35% tax on businesses that leave the country—leaving many Republicans on Capitol Hill to respond the next day with guffaws, grimaces and nervous hedging.

Gee, I wonder what they could be nervous about?

Could it be that these people are totally owned by their corporate donors, who aren’t happy about this whole “tariff” idea?

Corruption-bribe-5-x-7.-123rf

It’s not bribery if it’s legal.

“I do not want a trade war. I do not believe in a trade war. I do not think trade wars are healthy. I think history has shown that trade wars are not healthy,” said House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy.

“We know the size of America with the population around the world that we need to trade around the world,” he added.

Once everything we produce is outsourced to foreign countries, what exactly are we going to be trading in exchange for these products?

Could it be that you haven’t thought that far ahead?

Or is it just that you don’t actually give a damn about the future of this country?

“Some of these things do have to face a harsh reality but you have to be very careful if you’re going to add costly tariffs,” said Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, who endorsed Trump in May. “We’re all going back to the ‘30s when they started playing around with this and that and caused a lot of trouble.”

Are you seriously implying that the great depression was caused by economic protectionism?

2950340_orig

That’s low.

Republican Sen. John McCain, when asked whether he would support a 35% tariff, scoffed and and answered emphatically. “No!” he said.

On an array of policy issues, Trump is at odds with Republican orthodoxy. But on few issues is he as far removed from the rest of his party as on trade.

I don’t know what Time Magazine is talking about here, seeing as how Trump was elected as the President on a Republican ticket, and the founders of the Republican party would certainly agree with the tariff system.

It’s these people who are unorthodox shills.

d3f

What do we do with heretics again? Something with a “p”…

Republicans have long been the standard-bearers for free trade, opposing impediments to the exchange of goods, while traditionally, it has been Democrats who have supported taxing goods that are imported in the United States and called for similar trade protections.

In a far-gone age, Democrats where trying to appeal to White working class people, while Republicans were trying to appeal to small business owners. These different economic agendas were a reflection of that.

But now that the entire political dynamic is about Whites against the colored hordes of welfare recipients and their corporate sponsors, things are changing.

During the election, Trump flipped the script, promising to punish trade infractions and countries.

Put on your seatbelts, shills – we’re going to make America great again.

Though if you prefer to be purged for your treason, we can arrange that as well.