Cybertrucker was Shot in the Head Before the Explosion Went Off, Had Been Stationed at the Same Base as NOLA Trucker

So, should we start using AI summaries of news articles instead of quotes? As part of a New Year’s reboot?

Let’s try it.

From The Telegraph:

• Matthew Livelsberger, a 37-year-old highly-decorated Green Beret soldier, was killed when a Tesla Cybertruck he rented exploded outside Donald Trump’s Las Vegas hotel.
• Livelsberger had a gunshot wound to the head before the explosion, which officials believe was self-inflicted.
• The vehicle was packed with firework-style mortars, camping fuel, and canisters, which caused the explosion that injured seven people.
• Livelsberger was a supporter of Ukraine and had previously shown support for the country on social media.
• Authorities are investigating the incident as a potential act of terrorism, but the motivation behind the explosion is still unknown.
• Livelsberger’s past and personal life are being explored by investigators, including his divorce, arguments with his wife, and his use of a car-sharing app to rent the vehicle.

Well, that’s not great.

The Telegraph article was 900 words or so, and I think that is the problem here. There were several points that were dropped in the article and not commented on much, which were I think important.

First, he was not only a Ukraine supporter, but according to this article, actively recruiting mercenaries to travel to the country.

He also appears to have recommended a former military colleague for a private role travelling to the country in recent months.

A LinkedIn account under Livelsberger’s name commented on a post advertising a 30-day contract in Ukraine for a tactical combat casualty care instructor.

He wrote: “I’ve got a top 18D [Special Forces medical sergeant] recently ETSd who is looking for just this opportunity, sent him your way.”

He also “served in the Ukraine,” though it is not clear what that means.

The article also notes that the guy was not just “also in the military,” like the NYE NOLA trucker, but actually at the same base as him.

Both suspects served in the US army, spent time at the same base in North Carolina, toured Afghanistan and used the same car-sharing app to rent the vehicles used in their attacks.

North Carolina’s Fort Bragg, which was recently renamed “Fort Harriet Tubman,” is the largest army base in America with roughly 50,000 troops stationed there. So maybe it’s not that big of a coincidence. I would also say that using the same rental company is not that big of a coincidence. But the two things combined, with two political truck-related events in a span of a day, make the whole thing look very strange.

The other thing the AI summary doesn’t note is the impression you get from the article that the FBI is being very close-lipped about the whole thing.

The guy having been shot in the head before the truck popped off is particularly suspicious. I suppose it makes sense if you were setting off a suicide bomb to shoot yourself first as you might imagine that the explosion could lead to a more painful death. However, no one reported hearing a gunshot before the car blew up.

Teslas have remote driving. So, obviously, it would not have been any kind of challenge for someone to shoot this guy in the head and then remotely drive the car in front of the hotel and trigger the explosives. Though the guy’s skull can be examined and show the bullet hole, after that explosion you’re not going to be able to find much other evidence.

Further, if this guy was deep into the Ukraine thing and even doing recruiting, he would have been mixed up with all kinds of spooky CIA stuff, and easily could have been picked as a patsy, shot in the head in some location and then rolled out for the bombing.

In general, I don’t support wild conspiracy speculation, which is obviously what I am doing here, but the situation is obviously bizarre and there is no real information, so there is nothing else you can do other than wild speculation.

Obviously, US soldiers kill themselves constantly. They’re literally worse than the Japanese. These people do nothing but kill themselves whenever they have a bad day. And this guy had recently split with his wife who was cheating on him (military wives are even worse than other women when it comes to this). So him killing himself is not that big of an issue.

But when have you ever heard of a leftist suicide bomber?

And what sort of suicide bombing was this?

He easily could have rammed the car through the glass into the hotel lobby and actually killed people and caused some kind of structural damage. He was in the military his entire adult life, so he obviously would have understood something about explosives, and would understand that nothing was going to happen the way he did it, and the only injuries would be from broken glass.

He was a big Ukraine guy, so he would of course think (like all these people think) that anyone staying at a Trump hotel deserves to die for supporting Vladimir Putin’s brutal genocide against the brave trannies of the Ukraine. And obviously, it’s possible he could have killed someone when blowing the “car” up outside the hotel. It’s unlikely, but someone could have been walking by or whatever. So I don’t think it was just performative.

Of course, if you were going with the idea that this was a CIA job, you would obviously have to ask the same questions about why they wouldn’t try to kill more people, and maybe it makes more sense than a lone retard would be less likely to maximize death than the CIA.

But this is terrorism, regardless, as it is violence for a political end, and we do not see white people doing this very often. If anyone is going to do it, it makes sense it would be a Ukraine supporter.

Oh, and this guy’s uncle says he was “a big Trump supporter.”

So, yeah there’s that.

Then you have the “coincidence” of the guy doing this just after the NOLA attack.

And what is going on with that guy?

This is an American black guy from Texas who converted to Islam and changed his name. Although there are pictures from him in his military costume with the name “Jabbar,” which would indicate he’d legally changed his name to that, we are now three days out and no one has given his real name.

His real name probably wouldn’t mean much, as it would just be “Tyrone Jenkins” or something, but the fact that this hasn’t been revealed yet, as it is a relevant detail about such a big news story, indicates the level of information we are being given about this guy by the government/media.

Was he also a Ukraine supporter, I wonder? He was supposedly carrying an ISIS flag, and ISIS itself is very supportive of the Ukraine. US assets are shared between the Ukraine and ISIS, and it is the same CIA people running both wars.

What about the ISIS flag? How do you get one of those? You would think that any American buying one of these online with their credit card would be flagged by the FBI, no?

Did he make it? Did he buy it on Tor with crypto?

I suppose there are probably Chinese sites where you can just order a custom flag and have it shipped without sending any flags, so maybe that isn’t a great observation. It is notable though.

The most notable similarity between the two attacks, beyond the same rental service and the shared army background, is the fact that they were both electric vehicles. “Jabbar” was in the F-150 Lightning (which is potentially even more ridiculous than the Cybertruck, while not as cheapy), and these cars also allow for remote driving (unlike the Tesla, it has to be installed separately, but you can look up videos on YouTube of people doing it).

Of course, unlike Livelsberger, “Jabbar” was alleged to have been alive during the attack, getting out of his car and shooting at police. The media reports that there are witnesses, other than the cops, who saw the shootout. So, maybe that happened. It’s not on video. But maybe it happened. It’s also not outside of the realm of possibility that it didn’t actually happen.

Another notably strange aspect of the event was that the feds first said that “Jabbar” was working with five other people, then shortly thereafter said that he was acting alone. They said they were investigating his accomplices, then said they didn’t exist.

If the Feds Did It, What Would be the Point?

Both of these men were directly linked to CIA operations, Ukraine neo-Nazi-trannyism and ISIS. Being involved in these groups, both would have been exposed to all kinds of spooky stuff. Although information is limited, I don’t think it is unreasonable or schizophrenic to lean towards these two events having been part of some kind of fed psyop.

That’s where I’m at: I’m not ready to just declare this is all staged. Based on what we know now, there is some possibility that these were two separate terrorist events by two lone actors, taking place one after the other in the span of a day, and that all of this other stuff is just a big coincidence.

In terms of what the point of it would be, it’s probably obvious that having Islamic terrorism in America will work to build support for various operations in support of Israel. Why you would want pro-Ukraine, anti-Trump terrorism is less obvious, but it’s not hard to imagine that you would want Trump supporters to feel like Trump is under attack and therefore support his various military adventures.

It’s possible that they would have preferred a second “ISIS” figure for the Trump-Tesla bombing, and couldn’t find a patsy. The sort of black-ops CIA-FBI stuff we are talking about here is run by a relatively small group of psychopathic lunatics, and it is not clear to me that most of them are especially competent. “We need another nigga Islam convert, er, okay whatever, just dump that Ukraine homo in the Cybertruck” does not seem like a process that would be especially unlikely in this kind of scenario.

It might not be totally irrelevant that this happened in the midst of a big hoopla over Elon Musk and Donald Trump demanding that Americans be replaced with “culturally superior” Indians. From where I’m sitting, it’s clear that the CIA-FBI wants Trump to have as much support as possible, as they are planning to use him and his base of supporters to do large-scale wars. While Trump has been focused on supporting Israel, he’s also continually downgraded his opposition to the war on Russia. Most recently, he backed the Ukraine lunatic Mike Johnson as Speaker of the House. All of these tech people he is linked to now are making huge amounts of money on the Ukraine war, as tech has now become a big part of the military industrial complex. And Trump is apparently willing to do anything for his tech bros.

We shall see where this goes. But an “America under siege” narrative would be ideal for what the feds want to do with Donald Trump, and it also lines up very much with the agenda of all his big financial backers.