Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 28, 2016
The Jew-communist publication The Daily Beast – whose tagline should really be “The Goyim Know, Shut It Down” – has published an article condemning the goyim for reading Mein Kampf.
Speaking of taglines – which are sort of the same thing as subheadings – this article’s author, Mark Dery, uses the word “soporific” in his subheading, just to let you know he is a super-serious and intelligent person, perhaps even the owner of a physical copy of a thesaurus he consults when he is writing pretentious essays condemning Whites and promoting “Afrofuturism.”
The article is on the newly released German version of Mein Kampf, which went into circulation earlier this year. It had been banned from being printed, but is now being published with nearly 3,500 annotations, taking the book from 800 to nearly 2000 pages. The annotations, of course, explain why everything he says is not only wrong, but pure evil.
Still, the goyim are bad for buying it.
Dery first talks about how dangerous the book is – a vicious Orwellian concept (you never hear the right-wing saying The Communist Manifesto is “dangerous,” do you? Instead they argue that the system itself is dangerous, not a book about it) – and then insults Hitler’s literary stylistics.
Written in an overwrought, pseudo-educated style, Mein Kampf screams intellectual insecurity from every page, its pretensions marred by tortured syntax, vulgarities, and mangled metaphors. Speaking of which, Hitler’s howler about the soul-crushing effects of poverty during his Vienna days is a perennial favorite with critics: “Whoever has not himself been on the tentacles of this throttling viper will never know its fangs.” Partei-poopers insist on pointing out that vipers don’t have tentacles and do not, in any event, throttle, and that anyone luckless enough to have the life squeezed out of him by a constrictor will never know its fangs because such snakes, unlike vipers, kill through asphyxiation, not envenomation.
“He was a real dumbass, that guy who almost managed to single-handedly take over the world.”
I cannot help but be reminded of the “stupid billionaire” anti-Trump meme.
Obviously, Hitler purposefully mixed that metaphor, as there is no
And as far as commenting on syntax – very difficult to do when you’ve only read a book in translation (which I assume is the case for Dery, though I doubt he’s actually read anything other than excerpts, and that presumably only for this article). What you can glean from the translation shows a syntax that would now be considered awkward by modern standards of English literature, but is seen in similar form in other celebrated German-language authors of the time, including Freud. It is certainly in-line with German literature from the 19th century.
All this is to say that he is not seriously criticizing Hitler’s writing prowess, but just insulting him – because pure evil.
Actual photograph of teh ebil Adolf Hitler
It is very funny to read the statements about how the book is so dangerous to society, then see that it is actually borderline-illiterate crap.
He then claims that Hitler stated in the book he was going to commit a genocide.
Adolf besieged by grammar Nazis! It iss to laff, nein? But the laughter strangles when we read the chilling passages that prophesy the enslavement and slaughter of as many as 20 million human beings.
This is just untrue. There are no statements, at all, about “enslavement and slaughter” in Mein Kampf. They just say this over and over, counting on you to not read it.
He uses a translation from Ian Kershaw:
As Kershaw notes, Hitler had been rousing the rabble for years with his ravings about the “racial tuberculosis” spread by that “causal agent, the Jew.” No one who read Mein Kampf with any care could have missed the marrow-freezing implications of statements like, “The nationalization of our masses will succeed only when, aside from all the positive struggle for the soul of our people, their internal poisoners are exterminated.”
Hadding Scott has translated an article by Heinrich Haertle showing that the actual word used – “ausrottung” – does not mean genocide in this context.
Hitler was planning to remove all Jews from Germany and ultimately to assist other European nations in getting rid of them. Originally, he was going to send them to Madagascar, then he settled on sending them to Palestine, as such a plan as that got a lot of support from prominent rabbis, making the job a lot easier.
There is no evidence he ever planned to genocide anyone, or for that matter that he ever did it.
Andreas Wirsching is the director of the institute which produced the annotations for the book.
Eine Kritische Edition is selling briskly; the publisher has received orders for almost four times the initial print run of 4,000 copies. The Institute’s director, Andreas Wirsching, is confident the annotated edition “unmasks Hitler’s false allegations, his whitewashing, and outright lies.” But what if the reader is sympathetic to the book’s message? Won’t he dismiss the annotations whispering in his ear as the deceits of “international Jewry” or the nitpickings of the feckless professoriate, as Hitler would have?
The Third Reich is history’s best-branded atrocity exhibition, and Hitler—who gives over several pages in Mein Kampf to his role in designing the party’s notorious symbol—was its brand manager.
Really?
Even if you believe Hitler did the Holocaust and somehow started WWII (England and France declared war on Germany, but they still claim it was Hitler’s fault they did that), Jewish communism killed a lot more people.
Anyway – let’s relate this back to Donald Trump, shall we?
Immigrant-bashing xenophobia, racist nationalism, the mob mentality that doesn’t mind escorting protestors out of Trump rallies with a few cuffs and kicks, especially if they’re black: the fascist brand seems to be experiencing one of its periodic revivals, and little Hitlers in Europe and the U.S. are riding the wave of thuggish populism. (Did I mention that Greece’s neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party keeps its Athens bookstore well-stocked with copies of Mein Kampf? Or that it was the 11th best-selling book in India in 2015, its sales buoyed by the rising tide of Hindu nationalism whose pugnacious face is Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his right-wing Bharatiya Janata Party? Modi’s India-for-Hindus-only demagoguery recalls Trump’s anti-Muslim blather. Speaking of whom, The People’s Choice—at least, among white working-class volk in search of a strongman and a scapegoat—reportedly keeps a copy of Hitler’s collected speeches, My New Order, by his bed.)
Dery closes with “we have to shut it down because people are so stupid they believe lies of pure hatred and also because Donald Trump.”
Which brings us to a deeper, darker question: is it even possible, in these ideologically poisoned times, to change the mind of a true believer? Certainly, Hitler, a genius in the dark art of propaganda if nothing else, teaches us that minds can be changed. The bigotry, ignorance, and irrationality he unleashed were always there, to be sure, locked away in the mass unconscious, but Nazism let the German id off its chain. Hitler (and his sorcerer’s apprentice, the propaganda minister Josef Goebbels) turned one of the most literate, cultured countries in Europe into what the political scientist Daniel Goldhagen has called a nation of “willing executioners,” where ordinary citizens willingly, even gleefully joined in the fun of hunting down, torturing, and murdering Jews.
At a moment when the worst are full of passionate intensity and a Trump-ian contempt for “political correctness” is justification for the ugliest bigotry and the nastiest threats, the Enlightenment faith in the rational citizen, responsive to reason, looks a little naïve. An idea, as Morris Berman noted, is something you have; an ideology is something that has you.
So there you have it: in the age of Donald Trump, it is naive to imagine people are capable of objectively processing information and not using dangerous ideas to do hatred on innocents, so we must ban books which encourage wrong-think.
Truly a fantastic line of thinking.
smdh 2016.
For the record, Dery appears to be an Irish goy who has devoted his entire life to serving the Jewish agenda. It is now rare to find such a goy – at least among heterosexual male goyim. But apparently they do still exist. Dery is 57. I doubt you can find ten heterosexual male goyim so devoted to the Jewish agenda who are under 40.
