Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 11, 2014
Well, here we are. Eight months in.
Note that I missed the Sunday Round-up yesterday because I was writing this. Sometimes things get a bit overloaded. That piece should be considered optional – though I will do it when I can, it is a lot of work, and sometimes there are more pressing concerns. I work about 80 hours a week, and there just aren’t enough hours in the day.
Numbers continue to skyrocket.
I figured it would plateau at some point, but that just doesn’t seem to be happening. That graph is apparently saying that the last week or so, wherein our Ukraine coverage has been getting a lot of traffic, we have been at 25,000.
We are also doing very good on Google.
As I am researching details for Ukraine articles, I keep finding my own stuff.
We are just below the news and the Wiki entry on the first page of Google when you search two of the top revolutionary figures.
Man, these guys must be seriously pissed.
Both of them have actively attempted to hide their Jewish nature. Then along comes the wolf…
I can say, with all honesty, that I believe that the Daily Stormer is the number one English language outlet covering the crisis. But that isn’t so much because we are doing a super-great job, as it is because everyone else is doing so poorly.
I wish we had an in-house Russian translator. Russians do not, as a rule, have very good English.
If any Russians want to take that job, let me know. Actually, if anyone from any country that doesn’t have very good English wants to do translations, let me know. Russian would be the number one, French would probably be number two. Then any of the Eastern European languages. And Greek. Spanish and Italian too. Not really much need for the Scandinavian and German languages or Finnish, since most people in those countries have good English. Russian and French probably have the worst English of our people though. Even most of the Balkan people have more.
Still Haven’t Put Up a Forum
I am still considering a forum, but I don’t really see how it would be possible to not have it turn into a circus. The comments section is enough of a circus already, even when I’m deleting and banning like crazy.
I suppose it could have much looser rules, but I really do feel that this endless arguing about things is a total Jew tactic of subversion. One Antisemitic site I know of had open comments for a while, and the administrator admitted that most of the arguing in the comments section was people arguing with themselves with different names.
Still, I think a forum could be very beneficial in a lot of ways. For one, it would help people to connect in real life.
So it’s still on my mind.
Speaking of the Comments Section
Things appear to have gotten better since I’ve gotten more hardcore, but I’d be interested to hear the dear readers’ thoughts on the state of the DS comments section.
I’m doing about all I can do without having a moderator.
Still in the process of finding someone to do some work on the site, which will clean things up some. And I will get the promised up-down voting for comments.
Oh, and if there are any readers who couldn’t comment, and felt they were wrongly blocked, try again. I had some IPs blocked, but decided that didn’t work because with 4G, a whole lot of people are now sharing IPs.
Yes, I am a Putin Fanboy. To an Extent.
I have criticized Putin before, and I will again. He is a world leader, and not everything he does is going to be correct. Or at least I won’t agree with it.
But for the time being, I am very happy with what he is doing, standing up to our mutual enemy, and I am going to continue to support him as long as he continues to do the right thing.
I have a very good feeling about what is happening. So, it is fine if you choose to be skeptical – I myself have a policy of being skeptical. But don’t be a pessimist. Good things do happen. Hitler happened. And though Putin is no Hitler, the world wasn’t was it is now then. If this makes sense, I think the difference between Putin and the average politician of today is as wide as the gap between Hitler and the average politician of the 1930s. Churchill, nasty bastard that he was, wrote openly on the Jewish problem. It wasn’t particularly hardcore, but imagine a British politician writing that now.
Anyway, I wrote about my opinion on Putin on Saturday, in a Ukraine update piece.
Maybe his opposition to the Jewish agenda is all part of some complicated secret plan. Though I have no idea what the purpose of that could possibly be.
Anyway, you see that I was right about the Ukrainian revolution. I said it in November, and I kept the same position, while many attacked me for it. And it turned out I was even more correct than I thought I had been.
The number of anti-Putin troll comments I get is insane. Like, you can’t even believe it. As soon as this war started, they came in like a flood. I delete them all now. It is so painfully obvious there is an agenda to defame him, and spread this conspiracy gibberish, which says a lot in his favor. Of course, the conspiracy theorists would then claim that they are attacking him so that I will see them attacking him and then think he is good. Because whenever a conspiracy theory doesn’t make sense, you just make up another one to explain it.
They also spam link to a thread from Stormfront, which is basically just all lies that they do not even attempt to source.
Apparently, the moderators of Stormfront are now censoring my articles because I don’t support Pravy “do anything for the Jews” Sektor. Presumably, they are also mad I don’t support their new Jewish PM, the IDF agents who organized Pravy, and Obama who funds it all.
I was shocked and appalled to see they are literally still saying the Ukrainian revolution was good. I guess if you commit yourself to something like that, it’s hard to admit your wrong. Or maybe there are other reasons. I wouldn’t know.
We’ll see how that goes for them.
David Duke of course agrees with me, given that he is a man of sense, but apparently he has no influence on the narrative of Stormfront, which is pushed by volunteer moderators.
Donation Subscription
I’ve added a feature for monthly recurring donations. A few people have signed up already.
You can sign of for the following monthly donation amounts:
$2.00
$5.00
$10.00
$14.88
$19.33
I put $50 and $100 on there too, but that is more of a joke. Or just in case some rich folk come through.
If everyone who reads daily just signed up for the two dollar option, I could hire an Alex Jonestein-level staff and buy a 2014 Challenger with mounted machine guns…
…is that so much for a man to ask for?
I think everyone has $2 a month. Having a steady income in this way, rather than the occasional donations, would make things much more comfortable. Especially since I am probably going to have to relocate to Moscow, which is allegedly the most expensive city in the world. Even though that makes no sense.
One time donations are also still very good.
You can push this PayPal button:
And you can send me cash here, if you don’t use PayPal.
Andrew Anglin
6827 N. High Street, Suite 121
Worthington, Ohio
43085
February’s Top Ten
10.) What does the Negro Male Desire Most of All?
9.) Black Skin Differs From White Skin in Far More Ways Than Just Color
8.) Israeli Officers Running the Opposition in the Ukraine
7.) Jewish Author Harry Waton Admitted that Communism is Jewish, Hitler was Right and the Jews Aim to Conquer the World
6.) Deportation is Not Enough, Justin Bieber Should be Hanged
5.) Feminists Destroyed Society by Giving Men Free Access to Their Vaginae, Now All They Do is Complain About It
4.) Dead Degenerate Philip Seymore Hoffman Found by Jew “Friend” David Bar Katz, Son of Dirty Jew Pervert
3.) Vitali Klitschko is a Jew
2.) Non-White Female Soldier Brags on Istagram About Refusing to Salute the Flag
1.) White Women Flying Around the World to Have Sex with Blacks are Bringing HIV-AIDS Back to the UK
Note that this list is mainly determined by what goes viral on Facebook. It’s still interesting though, I think.
Note on Pictures of Beautiful Women
Though most people seem to enjoy them as much as I do, occasionally I get questioned about posting images of beautiful women. As I don’t post anything overtly sexual, I guess the idea is that it promotes an unrealistic standard. But I think that is pretty much the point of depicting beauty – it is to show an ideal, something that isn’t really meant to be achieved in real life (like a Dodge Challenger with machine guns mounted to it). The point is to celebrate the human as form as something divine, the feminine beauty as something immortal and sacred.
Throughout history, artists have created women whose form surpassed what appeared in nature. They usually depicted them naked.
Non-nude imagery of women tended to depict what could be decried as an unattainable standard as well.
I don’t see that a woman wearing make-up and posing for artistic photography is any different. Still, Schopenhauer and many a puritan opposed nude painting as something that created unnecessary stimulation.
Clearly, there is such a thing as unnecessary stimulation, and this is to be avoided whenever possible. However, classifying all stimulation as unnecessary is a bit of an overly extreme worldview, in my feeling. But maybe the Council of Trent had a point, and any indulgence in sensuality is mere Protestant (or pagan) excess. I’m not sure. But I do like Romantic paintings and pictures of beautiful and well-groomed women.
The way that the female form has been commercialized and commodified through advertisement/pornography is a separate issue completely, I think. That has to do with a debasement, a stripping of humanity from form, which even hypersexualization doesn’t necessarily lead to, if it is not attached to modern capitalism. Of course, all people save Jews, libertarians and feminists are opposed to that whole scene. But the idea that any time a woman is portrayed as visually beautiful or sensual it is a commodification seems incredibly cynical, if not outright nihilistic.
Coverage of Situation: Ukraine will resume shortly.
I am now thinking that a shooting war over Crimea is not going to happen, but Donetsk is a horse of a different color.
Hail Victory.
Andrew Anglin
