Danish MP Says “Bomb Women and Children” in Syria and Iraq

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 16, 2015

Søren Espersen
Søren Espersen

Well, these are weird statements.

The Local:

The head of parliament’s Foreign Policy Committee said that in light of the Paris terror attacks, the West should get much more aggressive in its campaign against the terror group Isis.

Søren Espersen, a senior Danish People’s Party spokesman and the head of parliament’s Foreign Policy Committee, said on Sunday that the US-led military campaign against Isis, which Denmark is participating in, should bomb civilian targets.

Speaking two days after Isis claimed credit for the Paris attacks that killed at least 129 people, Espersen said that the West is carrying out its campaign like “gentlemen” but needs to get more aggressive if it is ever to win the fight against Isis, which is alternately known as the Islamic State or IS.

We aren’t bombing spots where there are civilians, but we need to start doing so. IS hides behind women and children in villages and towns and they know that we are gentlemen won’t bomb them. That needs to end,” he told TV2.

When asked if that meant he thought the West should bomb women and children, Espersen said “yes, of course”.

“We need to when that’s where the IS fighters are. Those women are also to a large extent part of the system. We can no longer have a situation in which IS operates completely freely knowing full well that they won’t be bombed,” he said.

“We need to develop the war into a real war, otherwise we will lose,” Espersen added.

But why not just expel them from our countries though? Doesn’t that make more sense than bombing them in their countries?

At least some of these people were born in our countries, so responding by killing women and kids in Syria does not follow directly. If it was “firebomb women and children in the suburbs of Paris, Marseille and Rotterham,” I’d be like “yeah okay I’m following you but can’t we just round them up?”

Fighting Moslems in their own countries to make up for attacks in our countries would only make sense as revenge, and revenge would only make sense after they were expelled completely from our countries because otherwise all attacking them does is increase the likelihood of domestic attacks.

This isn’t really complicated.