Death of Moslem Parking Space Thieves Now America’s Top Story

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 12, 2015

Craig Stephen Hicks appears to have shot the Moslems because he was pissed off.
Craig Stephen Hicks appears to have shot the Moslems because he was pissed off.

Yesterday, the SJW army was out in force whining about how the three Moslems shot by a White man over a parking space was not the top news story in America.  Because, you know, if it had been a terrorist bombing instead of a shooting over a parking space, it would have been a top story.

Today, it is the top story, across the country.

more stories you say?  If it was Moslems shooting Whites it would be six million times that!
2,050 more stories you say? If it was Moslems shooting Whites it would be six million times that!

Vigils and protests are being held across the country.  Because these are special lives, you see.  Because they aren’t White.

Those using the hashtag #MuslimLivesMatter were scolded for taking away from the struggle of Blacks (?), so they have adopted the much less catchy and, oddly, much less inflammatory “taking innocent lives is never ok.”

HAHAHAHAHA
Who are you trying to make this point to???? (these are University of Michigan students at a vigil in Flint)

Can’t much argue with that.

Why This is Stupid

Many will see that the comparison between Moslem terrorism and a White guy who may or may not have hated Moslems shooting people is stupid, but may not be exactly able to put their finger on why.

The reason is this: when Moslems kill infidels, they do so representing not merely an ideology, but also of large groups of people who agree with the killings and urge that more such killings be done.  After Charlie Hebdo, for instance, there were people having vigils for the killers across the Moslem world, praising the acts, calling for and threatening to commit more such acts.

In the case of this angry parking spot White guy, there is no such situation.  There is no ideology that demands Moslems be killed, there is no political movement to kill Moslems, he is not a member of a group asking as part of a political agenda and no one is praising his actions or saying they need to be repeated.

It is categorically different.

When Charlie happened, people were not protesting the killers, they were protesting the ideology behind the killings and the groups who were calling for more such killings.  This was stated plainly and otherwise obvious.

What, exactly, are these people out protesting the deaths of these Moslems protesting against?  Are they protesting against Craig Hicks as an individual?  He is already in custody and will be sentenced to life in prison, given that it was in NC he may actually be executed.  How then does it make sense to protest him?  Again, as there is no ideology or political organization which says “shoot Moslems,” they can’t be protesting that.

Wait.  Are those the only two options?
Wait. Are those the only two options?

We are not going to stop hearing about this, and they are not going to stop comparing this to Moslem terrorism, so internalize that simple argument.  They will say “when a Moslem kills people it’s terrorism, but when a White does it he’s a random nut,” and this is simply a statement of fact, but it is important to understand why it is, because they say it as if it is some sort of double-standard.

Again:

Whether all Moslems support terrorism or not, there are huge numbers of them that openly support and call for terrorism, praise terrorists after they commit acts of terror.  There is no White Atheist or Christian group which says you should shoot Moslems, and no one is praising this fat parking lot guy.

Do not let these people twist it all up.