Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 2, 2016
The African dictator of America has used executive orders more than any President in history for increasingly more insane anti-White agendas. The three big ones were amnesty for tens of millions of invasive Mexicans, Obamacare and the HUD racial integration program.
Now, his trilogy is about to become a quadrilogy.
Last week we warned you that Barack Obama, Chief Executive of the Planet of the Apes Occupation Government, was plotting to use executive action to force through a gun control conspiracy.
Now, the ape prepares to pounce.
President Obama will press ahead with a set of executive actions on guns next week despite growing concerns in the United States over terrorism that have dampened some Americans’ enthusiasm for tighter firearms restrictions.
Yeah. I’d be shocked if there was even one single man who bought Obama’s claim that the solution to Moslems shooting you on the street is to take your guns away.
A few women probably bought it. But even they were presumably few. This is “ISIS wants us to close the border” tier lunacy.
The president will meet Monday with Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch to finalize a series of new gun control measures and will announce his package of proposals soon after, according to several individuals who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the plan is not yet public.
The African is meeting with another African to decide what rights to take from Whites in order to protect them from Arabs.
Is it any wonder racism is rising?
Watching a group of foreigners decide to strip you of basic rights triggers a primal defense mechanism.
One of the main proposals Obama is poised to adopt would require some unlicensed gun dealers to get licenses and conduct background checks on potential buyers. The change is aimed at informal dealers, such as those who sell online frequently or rent tables at gun shows but do not have a storefront.
Obama began examining how he could tighten the nation’s gun rules after October’s mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore. Administration lawyers have spent months reviewing various proposals to make sure they can withstand legal challenges.
A shooting done by Chris Mercer, a Black.
Maybe these Blacks should take their problems and go back to Africa? Leave us the hell alone?
And for the record, Mercer didn’t buy his guns at a gun show.
The idea of requiring informal gun dealers to obtain a license from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and of conducting background checks came up two years ago when White House officials drafted a proposal for dealers who sell at least 50 guns annually.
The idea was shelved because of legal concerns but gained new momentum after the Roseburg shooting. At that point, Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she would pursue such a requirement by executive action if elected. Administration officials gave the proposal another look and determined it could be done in a way that was legally defensible.
“Legally defensible” is codeword for “Jew the goyim.”
The White House review has been conducted in relative secrecy, soliciting input from gun safety groups without specifying which policies the administration might ultimately adopt. In the past month, Obama has met with former representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who was gravely injured in a 2011 mass shooting, and her husband, Mark Kelly, and with former New York City mayor Michael R. Bloomberg and the president of Everytown for Gun Safety, which Bloomberg helped start.
“Bloomberg,” you say?
In Obama’s weekly radio address, released a day earlier than usual, the president said he was moving unilaterally because Congress had failed to address the growing problem of gun violence.
“A few months ago, I directed my team at the White House to look into any new actions I can take to help reduce gun violence,” he said. “And on Monday, I’ll meet with our attorney general, Loretta Lynch, to discuss our options.
“Because I get too many letters from parents, and teachers, and kids to sit around and do nothing,” Obama continued. “I get letters from responsible gun owners who grieve with us every time these tragedies happen; who share my belief that the Second Amendment guarantees a right to bear arms; and who share my belief we can protect that right while keeping an irresponsible, dangerous few from inflicting harm on a massive scale.”
“An irresponsible, dangerous few” – yeah buddy, they are called “non-Whites.” That’s who’s killing everyone. White gun violence is virtually non-existent.
In reviewing its options, the administration has shut out congressional Republicans, who joined with some Democrats in helping block legislation to expand background checks after the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn.
“The administration has not communicated with us, and we have not been briefed,” Doug Andres, a spokesman for House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.), said in an email. “We will consider options once we have information, but what seems apparent is none of these ideas would have prevented the recent atrocities. Our focus should be on the consistent causes of these acts — mental illnesses and terrorism — rather than infringing on law-abiding Americans’ constitutional rights.”
Why would they include the cucks?
This is like saying “King Xerxes shut out the slave women of his harem when making the decision to invade Greece.”
Obama will make his case for additional gun restrictions in a number of forums in the coming month, according to aides, including during his Jan. 12 State of the Union address.
While beefing up background checks has strong support — a Quinnipiac University poll in December found that 89 percent of Americans supported checks for purchases at gun shows and for online sales — Obama’s actions also come as Americans have grown more fearful about the prospect of terrorist strikes and are expressing an openness to having ordinary citizens carry guns.
Yeah. The exact opposite reaction from that desired by the Jews who claim that the solution to getting shot is to have no guns.
A Washington Post/ABC News poll conducted last month in the wake of the San Bernardino, Calif., terrorist shootings, for example, found that 53 percent of respondents opposed a ban on assault weapons ban, a record high. When asked which is the better reaction to terrorism, 47 percent said encouraging more people to carry guns legally, while 42 percent preferred enacting stricter gun control laws.
Federal law requires that those who are “engaged in the business” of dealing in firearms to have a federal license — and, therefore, to conduct background checks of potential buyers. But it exempts anyone “who makes occasional sales, exchanges, or purchases of firearms for the enhancement of a personal collection or for a hobby, or who sells all or part of his personal collection of firearms.” The administration wants to narrow that exemption so that more gun sellers will have to get licenses.
It is unclear how many possible deals a change in the rule would affect, since these activities are not formally tracked and the administration has not disclosed what criteria it has selected to judge which gun sellers would have to register for a federal license.
It doesn’t matter how many people it affects. What matters is the concept. This is all part of a plan to beef-up the federal gun database so they know which goyim to look out for when they come to shut it all down.
The guns used in several recent mass shootings — including the ones in Roseburg and San Bernardino — were purchased legally, and their buyers were subject to background checks.
Yeah. It wouldn’t have prevented anything. It is totally unrelated to mass shootings. And Blacks – who are responsible for the overwhelming majority of shootings in America – do not buy guns legally.
This is designed to target the least violent and the most vulnerable group in America: Whites.
The final package will contain at least half a dozen measures, and possibly more, according to those who have been briefed on it.
Any action by the president is sure to trigger a major backlash from gun-rights activists and Republican officeholders. Jennifer Baker, an NRA spokeswoman, said in an email that the president “is doing what he always does when he doesn’t get his way, which is defy the will of the people and issue an executive order.”
Typical Black. They throw tantrums. Same deal here with a Black rapist – he doesn’t get his way with a woman, he just punches her in the face, throws her on the ground, has his way with her then stabs her to death.
Barack Obama is a Black rapist. Only instead of rapist a single White woman, he is brutally raping the entire White race in the United States.
“This is nothing more than a political stunt to appease anti-gun billionaire Michael Bloomberg and will do nothing to increase public safety,” she said, adding that a dozen high-profile mass shooters passed background checks, including Jared Loughner, who shot Giffords and 19 others in Tucson; Dylann Roof in Charleston, S.C.; and James Holmes in Aurora, Colo.
Fixed:
“This is nothing more than a political stunt to appease parasitic Jewish terrorist Michael Bloomberg and his evil, Christ-killing kin and will do nothing to increase public safety.”
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) mocked the president’s latest push in a tweet, writing, “Obama wants to impose more gun control. My response? COME & TAKE IT.”
But groups such as MoveOn.org have begun to mobilize firearm owners to support expanded background checks and other measures aimed at curbing gun violence.
MoveOn.org, you say? Who’s in charge of that? I forget.
Oh, right. Another Jewish billionaire.
I might be sensing some sort of a pattern here…
It’s almost as though gun control is part of some sort of Jewish agenda, and Obama is merely playing the role as the golliwog puppet, dancing to a Yiddish tune.
But that would be a conspiracy theory.
