Did I Miss MLK Day? Did You Also Miss That Important Day?

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 23, 2019

Martin Luther King Jr. pictured taking a relaxing bath in his home swimming pool after it is announced that the slaves will go free.

As the reader is aware, I am exiled in Nigeria, which is the only country on earth which has agreed to allow my freedom of speech. Despite their constant babbling about “muh freedoms,” the US government allows roving gangs of violent communists to stalk individuals and their families if they talk about the Jews on the internet.

So I was not stateside for Martin Luther King Jr. Appreciation Day, AKA This Black Cock is Delicious and You Must Suck It Day. A day which, as I understand it, was on Monday.

That said, I do read a whole lot of internets, and I didn’t really see much of anything about MLK Day. I saw that Steve King allegedly misquoted MLK as some kind of high-level white supremacist troll and then I saw people mentioning that the alleged MAGA Catholic School Attack, which turned out by Sunday to be an attack on Catholic School Boys by Black Israelis and an Apache Warband, took place on MLK Weekend.

For example, in this article from the Buzzfeed rip-off site Newsweek:

A video that sparked outrage across the country ignited a response from the White House press secretary Tuesday night, saying the Trump administration supports the students from Kentucky’s Covington Catholic High School.

“We’ve reached out and voiced our support” for the students, White House press secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters Tuesday night. “Certainly no one understands better than this president when the media jumps to conclusions and attacks you for something you may or may not have done.”

A snippet of video surfaced over the weekend showing a white teenager wearing a red “Make America Great Again” ball cap, and smugly smiling, while a Native American bangs a drum and chants. The two are apparently staring eyeballs, which set social media on fire during the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday weekend.

But since the initial video hit the worldwide web, other videos published, causing doubt on the whole situation. While explanations bounced in from all directions, Twitter suspended the account of the originator, which reportedly came from Brazil.

And while the main media focus pinpoints the white students from Covington and Omaha Nation elder Nathan Phillips, some blame a group of Hebrew Israelites who first encountered the Covington students, and that’s when Phillips interjected to break up a potential scuffle with a Native American chant, in which the viral staredown happened.

The Covington Catholic High student, Nick Sandmann, claimed he wasn’t disrespectful to Phillips, who likewise said he would like to meet with the Kentucky students.

“Race relations in this country and around the world have reached a boiling point,” Phillips said, as per the news release. “It is sad that on the weekend of a holiday when we celebrate the life and legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., racial hostility occurred on the steps of the Lincoln memorial, where King gave his ‘I Have a Dream’ speech.”

Sandmann claimed he did nothing wrong during the confrontation.

The day itself was used as context.

But talk of MLK remembrance was lacking.

Usually, there is an endless series of articles reminding the goyim of the glory of the great black man who just wanted us all to get along.

Martin Luther King, pictured giving his famous “can’t we all just get along” speech, wherein he demanded that Ronald Reagan free the slaves.

Martin Luther King Jr. was a communist.

He was also a serial adulterer, who regularly had drunken orgies with prostitutes.

Recently, when Donald Trump opened up the JFK files, a whole new batch of information about the celebrated Negro cultural worship figure was released, painting an even more damning picture of the chap.

BBC, from November 4, 2017:

A secret FBI dossier on civil rights leader Martin Luther King alleges that he had a string of affairs and other “sexual aberrations”, as well as links to the Communist Party.

It is dated just three weeks before Dr King’s assassination in April 1968.

The file was released in a tranche of documents relating to the assassination of John F Kennedy released on Friday.

Mr Kennedy is not referenced in the file and it is not clear why it was kept secret for almost 50 years.

There is no evidence that any of the claims in the report were verified.

Its cover shows it was assessed in 1994 by an FBI task force on the JFK assassination, which concluded none of the document should be released.

Many of the allegations contained in the paper appear to be reports of private conversations between others, or hearsay reported third-hand.

One allegation, that King had a mistress in California with whom he fathered a child, was attributed to “a very responsible Los Angeles individual in a position to know”.

Among its other accusations are that:

-Dr King was surrounded by advisers with strong links to the Communist Party USA

-His statements were always subject to approval by the alleged communist sympathisers

-He was a secret supporter of communism, “a whole-hearted Marxist”

-His organisation, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, set up a “tax dodge” to raise funds for its activities

-Dr King took part in “drunken sex orgies” and coerced young women to participate

-He had love affairs with at least four women, including folk singer Joan Baez

The list of alleged indiscretions would likely have been deeply problematic for the civil rights leader if it had been made public in 1968.

They can talk all they want about how the claims are “unverified,” but the fact that they were kept secret for so long does not help with that argument. Furthermore, much of this had already been confirmed for decades by other FBI documents, including audio tapes from his phone tap that no one denies are real.

Just for example, here’s a 2013 Daily Mail article citing old files, years before Trump released this new batch:

Leading one of the most astonishing double lives in history, King was not just the Bible-thumping champion of the rights of man, but also an inveterate womaniser who cheated on his wife throughout their marriage.

King’s secret sex life became such a talking point at the White House that recently released interviews with Jackie Kennedy revealed even she knew about it.

Jackie confided how her brother-in-law Bobby Kennedy had told her the FBI had recorded King trying to arrange a sex party on the night before the March on Washington in August 1963.

‘I can’t see a picture of Martin Luther King without thinking, you know, that man’s terrible,’ sniffed the former First Lady. Bobby had told her that King ‘was calling up all these girls and arranging for a party of men and women, I mean, sort of an orgy’.

That King was a sex addict — though probably no worse than Mrs Kennedy’s husband, JFK — has long been a source of embarrassment in an America that effectively declared him a saint.

Though it is beyond question that King was charismatic, tireless and courageous, it is also indisputably true that this brilliant man had a seamier side, as one of Dr King’s closest associates confirmed.

Civil rights campaigner the Rev Ralph Abernathy was the man who cradled King the day he was killed by an assassin’s bullet in Memphis, Tennessee, in 1968.

But in 1989, Abernathy — who succeeded King as the movement’s leader — incurred the eternal wrath of his allies and accusations of a Judas-like betrayal after he confirmed that long-standing rumours about his old friend’s rampant sexual appetites were true.

In his autobiography, Abernathy said King — whose 1953 marriage to Coretta Scott produced four children — had a ‘weakness for women’.

King, a pastor from the age of 25, ‘understood and believed in the Biblical prohibition against sex outside marriage,’ said his friend. ‘It was just that he had a particularly difficult time with that temptation.’

And that was putting it mildly. Abernathy related an extraordinary story that indicated King spent the last night of his life enjoying the attentions of not one but two lovers, followed by an encounter with a third woman whom he knocked sprawling across his motel room bed.

The fateful evening had started with King delivering his historic I’ve Been To The Mountaintop speech at the Masonic Temple in Memphis, in which he appeared to foresee his own death.

Also, from a 1998 Slate report on a book about King’s life:

On Jan. 6, 1964, FBI men installed microphones in King’s Washington, D.C., hotel room and turned on the tape recorder. According to officials who heard the tapes, King that night betrayed his wife, Coretta–not for the first or the last time–shouting, amid his most private activities, “I’m fucking for God!” and “I’m not a Negro tonight!” Later that year, agents anonymously shipped King “a ‘highlight’ recording of bugged sex groans and party jokes” along with a letter warning him: “You are done. There is but one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal fraudulent self is bared to the nation.” They called it the “suicide package.”

This was all accepted knowledge before the release of the latest round of documents.

And there is no doubt that he attended a communism school run by communist Jews as a young man.

That fact was reported while he was still alive.

To be fair – I just want to be 100% objective in everything I’m saying here – technically, they can still deny he was a communist. Maybe he was friends with communists and attended some meetings in his youth, they can say, but the claim of being an active ideological communist was all just a J. Edgar Hoover plot against him. Their classic denial is that the FBI couldn’t prove he was a communist, so they went the route of the sex scandal.

Whatever.

The sex scandals are enough to de-saint a man.

Furthermore, it is indisputable that he plagiarized his doctoral dissertation in college, and he is presently the only person in all of American history (and probably all or at least most all of the rest of the world’s history) I am aware of to have been caught and exposed doing this and not have his degree revoked.

That particularly problematic issue has its own Wikipedia page:

Regarding his PhD dissertation, written at Boston University, an academic inquiry concluded in October 1991 that portions of his dissertation had been plagiarized and that he had acted improperly. However, “[d]espite its finding, the committee said that ‘no thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,’ an action that the panel said would serve no purpose.” The committee also concluded that the dissertation still “makes an intelligent contribution to scholarship.” However, a letter is now attached to King’s dissertation in the university library, noting that numerous passages were included without the appropriate quotations and citations of sources.

Martin Luther King Jr.’s papers were donated by his wife Coretta Scott King to Stanford University’s King Papers Project. During the late 1980s, as the papers were being organized and catalogued, the staff of the project discovered that King’s doctoral dissertation at Boston University, titled A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman, included large sections from a dissertation written by another student (Jack Boozer) three years earlier at Boston University.

As Clayborne Carson, director of the King Papers Project at Stanford University, has written, “instances of textual appropriation can be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his dissertation. The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and sermons throughout his career.” 

Boston University, where King received his Ph.D. in systematic theology, conducted an investigation that found he appropriated and plagiarized major portions of his doctoral thesis from various other authors who wrote about the topic.

According to civil rights historian Ralph E. Luker, who worked on the King Papers Project directing the research on King’s early life, King’s paper The Chief Characteristics and Doctrines of Mahayana Buddhism was taken almost entirely from secondary sources.

The question of “why is this the only guy in all of history to have been caught plagiarizing and not have his degree revoked” is a particularly difficult “black privilege” question.

So, Are Jews Backing Down?

All in all, you have the picture of a kind of man that white people would generally not admire. You also have the problematic question of: “why exactly was this degenerate communist sex-fiend plagiarist promoted for decades by the entire media and academic establishment as a hero?”

Based on the startling lack of celebrations this week, it looks as though the Jews are backing off making this man the focus of black identity and a symbol for what black people can become.

The whole celebration of black people as saintly, godlike creatures of pure moral fortitude is overall problematic for the Jews, because they cannot get even a single black person to behave like anything other than a complete and total nigger.

Even Bill Cosby turned out to be a rapist.

Whoops!

As such, I propose that instead of trying to sell niggers as actually being white people with black skin just waiting to break out and become participating members of society once they overcome some invisible obstacle, the Jews instead just start celebrating real niggas.

Which is why I am proposing that Martin Luther King Jr. Day be officially replaced with Gucci Mane Day, starting next year.

Gucci Mane has none of the problems of MLK.

He:

• Is not a communist – he believes in getting that money by any means necessary
• Is not an adulterer – he doesn’t have a wife because he doesn’t love these hoes and he just fucks big booty sluts
• Is not a plagiarist – one of the greatest lyricists in all of black history, he has never been accused of ripping anything off other than his beats

Not only will white people have more respect for Gucci Mane than they have for the rat fiend MLK, simply because Gucci is honest and real, but black people actually care about Gucci Mane.

This is supposed to be a holiday for the blacks – shouldn’t it feature a black man that blacks actually care about?

Protip for Jews: playing Gucci Mane music videos in school and saying “this is why black people are great” will have a much better effect than this MLK hoax.

While this “just like you” bullshit simply makes people sick, real black culture is in fact fascinating to observe.

And there is a level of respect that white people have watching real black people that you are never going to achieve with lies and hoaxes. I’m supposedly the earth’s top nigger-hater, and I see black music videos where these guys are dancing around in diamond chains and fur coats, throwing hundred dollar bills around, talking casually about murdering people with a bunch of half-naked women shaking their booties, and I’m like “yeah, okay, I get this.”

It doesn’t make me want to integrate blacks into the schools of white children, but it does create a sense of awe. And let me tell you, Jews: that’s the best you can really hope for with these niggers.

So you can keep searching for the magical “just like you” civilized nigger, or we can all just be honest about the situation and take it from there.