DNC Staffer on Hillary Blaming His Data for Loss: “This is Fucking Bullshit”

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 2, 2017

Hillary Clinton is on a blame spree.

This is the way the female mind works, on brutal, disgusting display.

Nothing, under any circumstances, can ever be her fault. Everything she does wrong must be the fault of someone other than her.

Anyone who has had any interactions with women on any level knows that they are all like this.

Every single one of them.

They do not, under any circumstances, believe that they can be wrong for anything.

A big part of the modern inability of men to relate to women is frustration over this. Men have accepted that women and men are equal, and yet, the women in their lives won’t accept responsibility for anything.

“We accept responsibility, so why shouldn’t they?”

Well, because they are literally biologically incapable.

PROTIP FOR MEN IN RELATIONSHIPS: Don’t ever expect her to accept responsibility for things she does wrong. You will just be disappointed, and it will lead to relational problems. Expect that everything she does wrong, you are going to have to absorb, and do your best to keep her from doing things that are wrong.

You can reduce this negative behavior on her part through physical discipline.

Anyway, yeah – Hillary.

Wow.

RT:

Speaking at the annual Code Conference in California on Wednesday, Clinton pointed a finger at a range of entities that she feels contributed to her election loss. Among them were the Democratic National Committee.

“It was bankrupt; it was on the verge of insolvency; its data was mediocre to poor, non-existent, wrong. I had to inject money into it – the DNC – to keep it going,” she said.

Her accusation did not go unanswered, however – the DNC’s former director of data science took to Twitter to call her claim “f***ing bulls***.”

“DNC data folks: today’s accusations are f***ing bulls***, and I hope you understand the good you did despite that nonsense,” Andrew Terriault wrote in the first of a series of tweets that have since been deleted.

“We will respond in due time, but for now, just realize your work was worth way more than you’re being given credit for,” he continued.

He went on to say: “Private mode be damned, this is too important,” adding that he was “not willing to let my people be thrown under the bus without a fight.”

Terriault also accused Clinton’s team of being overly confident with regards to Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin – all of which Trump won by less than a point.

“Irony of her bashing DNC data: our models never had mi/wi/pa looking even close to safe. Her team thought they knew better,” he wrote in yet another tweet that was later deleted.

Speaking to the Washington Post, Terriault said Clinton’s comments “were hurtful to a lot of people, and it really upset me to see that happen to my team.”

He went on to acknowledge that his tweets had “got way more attention than I’d expected…”

“…And most of it wasn’t from people who actually cared about DNC data; it was from people who either wanted to reargue last year’s elections or enjoyed watching Dems fight amongst themselves. I’m not interested in providing material for either of those, so I took them down to avoid further drama.”

Yeah, see.

He be mad.

If he understood female psychology, he would just laugh this off.

But he believes in the myth of equality, and so believes that women have the ability to accept responsibility for their own behavior and she is just choosing not to. And it’s getting him all bothered.

Trump understands women, so he’s just like “lol stupid bitch lmao.”

To be Honest

I’ve been watching these Hillary appearances.

I’m on the computer 18 hours a day now since both Zeiger and Eric Striker got cancer in the same month (suspicious), and sometimes when I’m working I put stuff on YouTube on in the background.

She is way more charismatic and better spoken than she was during the campaign. Like, by an order of magnitude.

I don’t know why. If I had to guess, it’s a combination of being under less stress and being on better drugs.

I don’t think she ever could have won the election, under any circumstances. But if she’d been acting then like she’s acting now, she’d have had a much better shot.

I think she’d have a very good chance of beating Pence in 2020 if she had Booker as her running mate.

And she does appear to be planning this.

It is the only conceivable reason she would be making all these TV appearances. I mean, I guess ego could be a part of it – another protip for men here, a woman’s ego is based entirely on the attention she receives from other people, which is why women Hillary’s age generally like having a lot of grandbabies to give candies to – but it seems like someone would be telling her to chill out on talking about the election itself this much.

I mean, she said she’s writing a book – why doesn’t she do that, then do a book tour?

I think she’s planning a 2020 run. Honestly, I think that is happening.