Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 18, 2016
There is yet more privacy drama, with the FBI demanding Apple give them special anti-encryption software to hack the phone of the crazed haji who shot-up the autism center in San Bernardino last year.
Top faggot Tim Cook is refusing the FBI’s request, and I support this position. I am indeed pleasantly surprised by it.
The criminal government let these hajis into our base, then didn’t track them as they were stockpiling weapons and flying back and forth to the Middle East – going so far as to openly praise ISIS on a public Facebook account – and now they’re telling us we have to give up our freedoms.
Cook issued the following statement in response to FBI demands:
We have great respect for the professionals at the FBI, and we believe their intentions are good. Up to this point, we have done everything that is both within our power and within the law to help them. But now the U.S. government has asked us for something we simply do not have, and something we consider too dangerous to create. They have asked us to build a backdoor to the iPhone.
Specifically, the FBI wants us to make a new version of the iPhone operating system, circumventing several important security features, and install it on an iPhone recovered during the investigation. In the wrong hands, this software — which does not exist today — would have the potential to unlock any iPhone in someone’s physical possession.
The FBI may use different words to describe this tool, but make no mistake: Building a version of iOS that bypasses security in this way would undeniably create a backdoor. And while the government may argue that its use would be limited to this case, there is no way to guarantee such control.
The fact of the matter is that there is no way the use of this would be limited simply to this one phone, and the FBI itself is so unsecure that they would leave this on a computer which could easily be hacked by China or anyone else and may even end up in the public domain.
A vote for iPhone is a vote for freedom. Though it is also a vote for buttsex with men, so I dunno lol.
It is stupid for the FBI anyway, as all US law enforcement and security agencies are using Apple phones specifically because they are so much better on privacy than Google and the Koreans. Ultimately, they are asking Cook to give foreign governments the ability to hack the President’s iPhone, NSA iPhones, etc.
Google Paki Waited to Endorse Cook’s Position
Google first refused to issue a statement, then their Paki CEO came out with a series of Tweets.
1/5 Important post by @tim_cook. Forcing companies to enable hacking could compromise users’ privacy
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
2/5 We know that law enforcement and intelligence agencies face significant challenges in protecting the public against crime and terrorism
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
3/5 We build secure products to keep your information safe and we give law enforcement access to data based on valid legal orders
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
4/5 But that’s wholly different than requiring companies to enable hacking of customer devices & data. Could be a troubling precedent
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
5/5 Looking forward to a thoughtful and open discussion on this important issue
— sundarpichai (@sundarpichai) February 17, 2016
Google of course has nothing to lose by coming out and saying “oh yeah Good” because Android is already a total security disaster and they’ve already worked directly with the government to provide backdoors. This is just PR.
And it still took this Paki a day to come out and type these hollow words.
Same Solutions to This Same Stupid Problem
This is the same problem, again: “well, there are all these Moslems in your country, so we have to take everyone’s freedoms away.”
Besides all the economic, social and terroristic problems caused by having Moslems in our country, having them means you can’t have freedom. It seems that the loss of freedom alone is reason enough, in a basic cost-benefit analysis, to decide not to have Moslems in your country.
I mean, look at the airports, what they do to us there. It’s humiliating, having these Black people touch you all over, taking off your shoes, going through the naked body radiation machine – all of that because of Moslems.
Sorry, goyim. We brought Moslems into your country and they’re killing you so now you have to have your body felt up by these Blacks.
The obvious solution is to outlaw Islam and banish the ones already in our base. Pay for their plane tickets, send them back to wherever the hell they’re from.
And they’ll say “oh no, you can’t do that because…”
Because why?
These people are hurting our country in innumerable ways, and they provide nothing. The establishment can’t even come up with anything that they provide. At least the Mexicans work (even though it’s more complicated than that), the Chinese invest (even though it’s more complicated than that), the Indians do IT work (even though it’s more complicated than that) – Moslems are a totally worthless group. The only thing they do is run convenience stores in Black neighborhoods, and they allow them to sell crack and engage in other criminal activity at these stores and get a cut. That doesn’t benefit society.
It is simply basic logic to remove them.
Donald Trump will facilitate kebab removal. Because Donald Trump is allowed to talk sense.
When Trump is President, we’re going to make this country so great that all but the most hardcore liberals will get on board the Trump Train. Within a year, he’s going to fix so much, that he’ll have Putin-level approval ratings (at least among Whites), and then he’ll be able to do whatever he wants, such as call for mass deportations of Moslems who have been given fake legal status in this country by criminals.
