Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
February 9, 2017
Today on my blog: In Malta, to manage migration and save lives with our Libyan and African partners https://t.co/0QNplkEX6v pic.twitter.com/aNgMgD1Cds
— Federica Mogherini (@FedericaMog) February 8, 2017
So when Merkel first opened the floodgates to bury Europe in disease-ridden brown sludge, she was like “oh, well, you selfish people stopped having babies, so you have to have these terror-rapists to work to pay your pensions.
Then it was revealed that 70% of them were illiterate in their own language, and revealed that it was going to cost hundreds of billions of euros to feed, clothe and house these people, and then Merkel was like “emmmmm, yeah…..”
And the “pay our pensions” argument sort of dropped off, and it was just non-stop Beach Boy “this is our moral duty because of the Holocaust” rhetoric. At the same time, Merkel did this Turkey deal which does appear to have slowed the numbers, and came out with, like, “oh well, yes, we can’t have infinity…”
But now – shockingly – the EU is bringing back the “pay our pensions” argument.
RT:
Aging and graying Europe won’t close its doors to asylum seekers, as it needs immigration, the EU’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said, adding that Europeans had been migrants themselves “up to few years ago.”
A bitch, of course.
Because Europe is run by women and somehow people imagine this is okay.
She after that brown dick smdh.
“I believe Europeans should understand that we need migration for our economies and for our welfare systems, with the current demographic trend we have to be sustainable,” Mogherini said.
Mogherini, who was speaking at the Senior Officials Meeting at the Valletta Joint Action Plan 2017, was joined by Maltese Foreign Minister George Vella, as well as officials from Europe and Africa. The meeting was convened to deal with migration through cooperation with third countries.
Mogherini slammed the stance of immigration opponents as “based on confrontation, instead of cooperation; on building walls, instead of building partnerships; on closures and bans, rather than dialogue,” promising the Europe will instead take a “fair” and “humane” approach.
It’s morals and principles, goyim.
You have to give your daughters to these vicious animals or you’re a mean person.
“Let me be totally clear from the very beginning: Europe does not and will not close its doors. Also because – and as an Italian I think I can say it loud – we Europeans have been migrants ourselves up to few years ago.”
Mogherini called attention to the approximately 4,500 lives lost as asylum seekers tried to cross into the EU via the Central Mediterranean route in 2016 – the worst figure on record, according to the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR).
“Every day, every single day, people still die on the route; those we see at sea, those we do not see in the desert [in Africa]. Each one of those lives is one too many and we can save them, protect them; prevent these dangerous journeys only if we manage together,” she said.
Obviously, it’s better if they’re dead.
There are way, way too many of these “people.” Even if you like them, it is a scientific fact that there are just too many of them.
Mogherini stressed that Europe shouldn’t “prevent people from seeking a better life elsewhere” and must “stop the tragedy at sea, and in the desert.”
Europe is a country of immigrants, goyim.
The issue of the aging and graying of Europe had been in the headlines long before the refugee crisis broke out. Back in 2012, an aging report from the European Commission said the EU’s population is “projected to reach 517 million in 2060,” adding that “nearly one third of the citizens will then be aged 65 or over.”
Three years later, in the middle of the massive refugee influx, virtually no change in forecast was made in the aging report released in 2015.
“Europe is currently and will remain in 2060 the oldest continent in the world also when looking at the ‘very-old-age dependency ratio,’” it said.
It will also be the most technologically advanced continent. I mean, if it weren’t for the sludge flood it would be. All things being equal.
And hey – robots are coming.
It is mainstream, accepted fact that in the next twenty years alone, as many as half of current jobs will be lost to automation.
This is not some kooky theory. It’s a known fact.
There is absolutely no need for an infinitely expanding population.
That idea is nonsensical. Especially when we know these people don’t want to work and will refuse work and are coming to live on welfare. They also lack the IQ to work in any jobs beyond manual labor.
They are costing Europe billions.
Automation aside, what is the argument for how welfare parasites benefit the economy of a country with an aging population?
I seriously cannot even picture what it would be.