Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 6, 2016
Also in this clip, The Leader does an Alex Jones bit.
Hillary Clinton, a braindamaged feminist icon who is running for President in America, has adjusted her tinfoil hat and accused the last White nation of supporting the last White candidate.
It’s honestly shocking that she keeps saying this. But I don’t know what else she could say. I’m trying to think what I would tell her to say if I was advising the Clinton campaign, and I can’t really think of anything better.
Hillary Clinton accused Russian intelligence of interfering with the American election, implying that President Vladimir V. Putin viewed a victory by Donald J. Trump as a destabilizing event that would weaken the United States and buttress Russian interests.
“It’s almost unthinkable,” Mrs. Clinton said on Monday, referring to what she called recent “credible reports about Russian interference in our elections” and citing a hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s emails in July.
“We’ve never had the nominee of one of our major parties urging the Russians to hack,” Mrs. Clinton said in a news conference. “I want everyone — Democrat, Republican, Independent — to understand the real threat that this represents.”
Oh, it’s real alright.
Real in her mind.
And it could happen to you.
The comments, Mrs. Clinton’s most extensive yet on one of the more unusual subplots of the presidential campaign, came after a Washington Post report that United States intelligence and law enforcement agencies are probing a wide, covert Russian effort to disrupt the presidential election.
It is hardcore tinfoil.
Hillary also recently accused Putin of running the Alt-Right and Alex Jones. But don’t be too hard on her – she has braindamage.
Like, flat earth, chemtrails, crisis actor type stuff.
Asked by a reporter if Russia’s actions amounted to a cyberwar, Mrs. Clinton said, “I’m not comfortable using the word ‘war.’”
But she said she viewed the hacking of the Democratic National Committee, which American officials have linked to Russian intelligence agencies, and warnings there could be additional breaches intended to influence the presidential campaign “a threat from an adversarial foreign power.”
In conversations lately with donors, Mrs. Clinton has urged noncomplacency. She has stressed that foreign enemies who hope Mr. Trump will succeed, in order to weaken the United States, may try to disrupt the November results, perhaps with a cyberattack.
This is an extremely concerning thing she is saying. I mean that it’s concerning that she’s saying it.
It may simply mean that she will blame Russia when she loses. But it may mean that the US is planning to hack the election itself and then claim that Russia did it, so they can declare the election invalid.
I actually would not be at all surprised if this is the plan. She is setting-up for doing exactly that.
Hours after President Obama met with Mr. Putin at the Group of 20 summit in Hangzhou, China, Mrs. Clinton delivered a harsh assessment of the Russian leader’s role in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and potential future breaches.
“When Putin was asked about it, he could barely muster the energy to deny it, if any of you saw it,” Mrs. Clinton said, adding that the Russian president, whom she clashed with as secretary of state, “and the team around him certainly believe that there is some benefit to them to doing this.”
The DNC was apparently hacked using a phishing email, meaning absolutely any single individual with a laptop could have done it.
Ivan Ivanoff is not the only man 1337 enough to send a phishing email.
These people have presented absolutely zero evidence that Russia had anything to do with it, they have just repeated the allegation over and over again until now, much of the media is stating it as fact.
After talks stalled between Mr. Obama and Mr. Putin on how to handle the humanitarian crisis in Syria, Mrs. Clinton cast blame partly on the Russians for failing to come up with a solution.
“The whole situation has deteriorated in many ways because of the refusal of the Russians and the Iranians to put the kind of pressure on Assad that is necessary to reach an accommodation that would save lives,” she said, referring to the Syrian president, Bashar al-Assad.
While the White House opposes putting into effect a partial no-fly zone in Syria, Mrs. Clinton reiterated her support for such action. “I think we need leverage,” she said. “I’ve always believed that if that were on the table and it were clear we were going to pursue it, that would give us the leverage we don’t have now.”
The US is already illegally occupying Syria. The NYT won’t say this, but it’s a fact. US troops being in Syria is illegal under international law, as is funding terrorist groups to overthrow an elected government.
Assad won the election in 2014 with 88.7%. The NYT doesn’t mention that too often either.
The no-fly zone would entail shooting down Syrian jets as well as the jets of her allies, which include Iran and Russia.
There is no way that Russia would respect a no-fly zone established by an enemy force illegally occupying the nation of one of her allies, who she has been invited to defend. And shooting down Russian jets would be a declaration of war on Russia.
As such, Hillary Clinton is literally calling for the launching of a World War with Russia in order to protect foreign terrorists attempting to overthrow the democratically-elected government of Syria. She claims it’s for human rights.
This is where we are at.
It’s the Twilight Zone.
I think it is time for Trump to address this issue. By again calling for a “no-fly zone,” she has given him the perfect opportunity. It isn’t hard to explain what I just explained:
Hillary Clinton is calling for a World War with Russia to protect terrorists attempting to overthrow the democratically-elected government of a foreign country in the name of human rights.
