Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Zeiger
Daily Stormer
April 18, 2017
Keep sawing at that branch, ladies.
We have another round of SJW infighting!
This time, a feminist is attacking the inclusion of a disgusting lesbo on the popular science fiction show “Doctor Who.”
Note that Doctor Who is like, the ultimate SJW show. They go above and beyond the minimal requirements for having “diversity” on, and is beloved by liberal nerds the world over.
I tried watching the show many years ago, but then saw that it had, like, 60 seasons. Ain’t nobody got time for that!
It actually started out in the black and white era. A venerable British institution, now dedicated to glorifying homosexual Negroes.
Doctor Who has been slammed by a feminist campaigner who is claiming that a gay assistant was added to provide “girl-on-girl titillation for male viewers”.
Last night viewers tuned into BBC1 to watch the arrival of Pearl Mackie’s Bill Potts, who is the Doctor‘s first gay assistant.
After meeting the Doctor, she told him about a girl she’d seen in the canteen who’d turned her head.
She said: “There was this girl student, beautiful… eye contact – perversion. I gave her extra chips every time, extra chips like a reward for all the perversion.”
“Oh, and by the way, I want you to know that I’m a filthy carpet muncher, even though this has no relevance to the plot of this story.”
Who’d be “titilated” by this monkey-faced pervert?
Last night fans overwhelmingly praised Bill’s arrival and writer Steven Moffatt has previously said that he thinks it’s incredibly important to have more diversity on the show.
The fact that the show is already super-cucked is the exact reason it’s being targeted by this feminist.
You see, the more you comply with SJW insanity, the more violently you will be attacked by them. The reason for that is that SJW’s are cowards who only go after weak, submissive targets, and fear anything they don’t already have control over.
But feminist campaigner Julie Bindel claimed that Bill was probably added to please male viewers.
She told the Mail on Sunday: “This is something that is clearly done for the benefit of those who just think of it as girl-on-girl titillation.
“I don’t want to have representations of lesbians which is all about sexism, double entendres and sexualised behaviour. It’s just taking two women and using the blueprint of sexist heterosexuality.”
Blah blah blah.
It can be summed up like this: “This is bad, because men might enjoy it.”
That’s the argument, here.
Can you believe these nagging sluts? I would rather be harassed with fistfuls of snakes than put up with this, tbh.
When a woman starts spouting this kind of nonsense, it’s a cry for help. She’s trying to tell men, in her own way, that she yearns for WHITE SHARIA.
Are you so cruel that you would deprive her of that?
