Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 18, 2015
The narrative of “Moslems are the victims of Moslem terrorism” has kicked up a notch with France banning protests against Islam.
AP:
Also Saturday, the Paris administrative tribunal ruled that Paris police were authorized to ban an “Islamists out of France” rally planned Sunday by two groups that promote secular and republican values.
One organizing group, “Secular Riposte,” said on its Web site that it would instead hold a news conference on Sunday. Resistance Republicaine, another organizer, said it would still hold similar rallies in the southern cities of Bordeaux and Montpellier on Sunday.
On a foundational psychological level, we still think of ourselves and others as parts of larger collective wholes.
So when most people hear things like “yeah the Moslems are killing us so now we have to restrict the rights of the people they are killing to protect them from people not liking them,” they just completely shut off, because it is so difficult on a human psychological level to process that logic and it cannot simply be dismissed as lunacy when it is a monolithic establishment saying it.
That is how they get away with it. It is the Big Lie.
While France is banning people from protesting being slaughtered by foreign welfare recipients who are in their country for reasons no one really understands but apparently has something to do with both a collective racial punishment for colonialism and ethnic food stalls, the EU is discussing strengthening “hate speech” legislation to protect Moslems.
Diplomatic and NGO sources in Brussels say that the European Union is now considering proposals from Muslim groups to strengthen laws against “hate speech” following the fatal attacks in Paris at the Charlie Hebdo satirical magazine and a Jewish Supermarket.
…
Mainstream Muslim leaders have close contacts with the European Union and its related institutions, as do the leaders of other faith groups.
The sources, consulted in the last two days, who insisted upon anonymity, said that senior EU officials were sympathetic to calls for libel and hate-speech laws to be strengthened, but were sceptical of getting support from member governments or from the European Parliament where Right-leaning parties increased their presence at last year’s European elections.
One well-informed member of a non-governmental orgainsation in Brussels said:
“The conversation is going on. In fact, it’s the only game in town after Paris. But you aren’t going to get anyone to go on the record right now. Everyone’s too scared, and I don’t mean scared of the Islamists, I mean scared of being accused of being politically correct, even if they are.”
I can understand where they are coming from as bureaucrats. If “multiculturalism” is a directive – and it is – than how are you supposed to make it work without silencing all criticism of it? Obviously you can brainwash people from birth, but once the colorfuls start with the mass-murder the brainwashing gets bypassed by survival instincts.
What we need to do is go back and question the initial assumption that multiculturalism is good or necessary. The core of this thing needs to be debated. It never was debated when governments started forcing it on us, they just called us racist if we opposed.
And the reasoning behind it is constantly changing. First it was “well you have to let these people in to do jobs you can’t do” then it was “oh your ancestors colonized these people, you must let them in as payback against you” and now it’s either “oh you’re not breeding enough so you must replace your population with these people” or “oh they are getting killed in their own countries we must save them.”
Here on the Daily Stormer we have been through all of those various lines of reasoning and found them faulty, but the fact that there have been so many different explanations shows that they were arguments to back up a conclusion.
We need a discussion. That should be the key demand of all nationalists. An open conversation, free of name-calling, where all sides are allowed to present their positions openly without fear of being arrested under Orwellian anti-racist speech legislation.
Once the conversation begins, we win by default, because none of this was ever meant to make sense.
