Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
April 12, 2017
Many women see something like this and become sexually aroused. That is what we’re dealing with.
We are told by feminist society that men sexually objectify women. While this statement is technically true, given that we are creatures that reproduce sexually, the opposite is much more true: women sexually objectify men.
Men tend to fetishize women as sacred objects to be protected and defended. You call this “sexual objectification,” but it is not selfish in nature. Women, on the other hand, view men as existing purely as tools to serve their sensuous, emotional and material needs.
Generally, female sexual liberation results in women becoming sexually involved with a series of men they find exciting or physically attractive, until they get into their late twenties and these men they are interested in are no longer interested in having sex with them. They then make the decision to either keep skanking it up with lower quality men, while still attempting to seduce the good ones (the “cougar” phenomenon), or they settle with some beta male they can manipulate and abuse while exploiting him for resources.
That is the basic pattern we see all around us.
However, some particularly extreme women take it a step further, and seek out extraordinarily violent or otherwise criminal sexual objects.
A woman in Berlin is planning to marry the brother of assassin Anis Amri and bring him back to live in the city.
The woman, known only as Susanne K., 34, got to know Walid Amri, 31, on Facebook in the days following the December 19 attack, where 12 people died and dozens more were injured after Anis crashed a truck into a Christmas market.
They hooked up on the social networking site on Christmas day – two days after the killer was shot dead by police in Milan, Italy.
‘I sent a message of sympathy to him and his family,’ she told Germany’s Bild newspaper. Bild added; ‘Amri was touched by the kind gesture and opened his heart to the stranger.’
They remain in contact daily using French as he speaks no German and she no Arabic. He calls her ‘mon amour’ – my love – and she refers to him as ‘mon coeur,’ or my heart.
Bild says the duo are talking of a wedding but are short of cash. The mother-of-three added; ‘Money plays a part. I can’t finance everything. But he knows that.’
Her children were fathered by Palestinian and Kurdish partners. ‘Now it’s just a Tunisian!’ she jokes.
…
The plan is for her to fly to Tunisia in the summer, marry, and bring back Amri to Berlin – if the authorities would allow it.
The Daily Mail, for whatever reason, is blurring out this woman’s face, but you can see she is white.
Men need to wise-up to what these women are up to and they need to do it quickly.
We are in a crisis situation here. They are destroying our civilization.
nb4 “Jews are responsible for the behavior of women” – that isn’t even true. Jews are responsible for the social and political factors that allowed women to behave like this, but women will always naturally make the most destructive decisions imaginable, in any given situation.
If you doubt that, try to get out of TV land for a moment and just think about the people around you. The women in your life, in your friends’ lives, the women you knew in school, the women you know from work – what are the overwhelming majority of them acting like? Are they making good decisions?
They are not. It is statistically impossible that the majority of women you know are making decisions that are anything other than totally destructive to our collective society (if you live in a Western country that is full-on liberated).
We need to wise-up. We need to alert our brothers of this problem, and we need to band together.
We need to shame the white knights and we need to shame the women. We need to stand together as white men against this insane, deranged behavior of our women.
We don’t have any choice.
And look: if you’re still so cucked-out that it’s important to you to focus on what is good for women, just ask yourself if the present situation is good for women. Compare it to the situation women had before liberation.
It’s no contest.
