Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 18, 2018
This is true female liberation, goyim.
But also, stupid goyim, this is true female liberation as well, my goyim.
The hijab question is a legit gotcha for basically anyone who supports mass Islamic immigration into the West.
Both answers to it are effectively wrong in the modern feminist multi-racialist paradigm, so they sort of pivot back and forth from “symbol of oppression” to “feminist symbol of liberation.” Although in recent years, they’ve been going toward the latter a lot more than the former.
This became especially problematic during the New Year when Iran was having a feminist revolution and the media was praising the women for liberating themselves of their headscarfs. People were like “but wait – I thought it was a symbol of empowerment?”
The funny thing is that they always make it the absolute of one or the other – it is either the ideal form of oppression or the ideal form of liberation, and maybe it is somehow both.
Even in the wake of the Iranian revolt confusion, Germany thought that the “symbol of liberation” meme was solidified enough that they could start promoting it as such.
Troubles with that.
Some feminists still running with old memes.
RT:
A German college has provoked massive public outrage with its Muslim face veils course. The move was slammed as supporting the oppression of women and promoting Islamization, claims which the college denies.
The “Headscarf and Hijab in Dresden – dress codes in Islam” – listed by the Dresden adult education center as part of its curriculum for the spring and summer semester – stirred the wave of public indignation. The one-day course offers participants an opportunity to get an insight into the “origin and meaning” of various female dress codes in Islam.
However, it was apparently the course description on the educational facility’s website that ignited the outrage. “Colorful headgear makes one curious about its wearers. Various colors, forms, binding techniques and materials give hints about the cultural background [of the people wearing various Muslim face veils,” it says. It added that participants would have a chance to try on some Muslim female head wear to discover “how it feels to wear a burqa.”
Now that is post-meta funny right there.
They are effectively training women to become Moslems, in the name of a state that is self-Islamizing by importing a massive all-male Islamic population and encouraging women to date them.
Recently, German state media featured a sketch of a white woman converting her white son to Islam.
The description further says that the course was supported by Dresden city authorities. The German public, however, apparently found the educational initiative inappropriate, and its promotion spurred a barrage of critical comments on the college’s official Facebook page.
“These pieces of clothes (burqa, etc.) are used in Islam for the oppression of the Muslim women! And you offer such a course, which is also funded by the city of Dresden? [Does it mean that] women from other cultures, who live here, should gradually get used to such “clothes?” one person commented.
“We live in 2018 and not in the Middle Ages. These robes (burqas) are anything but arousing curiosity. This appeasement of Islam is just pathetic,” another wrote. Some appeared doubtful if the college really offered such a course “in earnest,” while others said “it must be a joke.”
Other comments pointed out that the “colorful description of the course” seems to suggest that it overlooks the fact that many women are “forced” to wear face veils under the threat of violence and those who still refuse to wear them are ostracized by their families.
The issue also drew the attention of some German politicians and rights activists. Joerg Kiesewetter, a regional lawmaker and member of German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union party, said the course “abounds with naivety.”“We would like to [live in] a society in which we can look each other in the eyes and must not learn how people should veil themselves,” he said, as cited by the German Bild daily.
The initiative was also criticized by the German Muslim women’s rights activist, Seyran Ates, who said the course in fact promotes a traditional role model for a woman in Islam. The language of the course description “presents the worldview behind the veiling in an uncritical manner and downplays its significance,” she said, adding, that Muslim face veils are symbolic of a society where gross gender inequality still exists.
I have decided that the German government has decided – at the very least, Merkel has decided – that the plan for the country is to forcibly convert the people to Islam.
They are not doing the thing that the French tried to do where they wanted the incoming Moslem population to convert to secular atheism. Maybe this is an expression of German ingenuity – certainly, they have seen that the French project failed, and thus they realize that the only option to is for the native population to integrate with the incoming population.
Islam is certainly a much stronger culture than secular Western atheism, which isn’t really a culture at all but a lack of a culture.
