Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 19, 2016
British cowards recognized yesterday that it would obviously be impossible to ban Donald Trump from their country.
If he wants in, he’ll get in – nothing can stop him.
To cover their pathetic weakness and complete inability to contend with the gloriousness they stand in opposition to, the Britcucks used heavy name-calling.
For three hours, the government of Britain called Donald Trump names.
In defense of Moslem terrorists.
During the three-hour debate here in Westminster Hall on whether to ban Donald Trump from the United Kingdom, many British lawmakers extended the hand of friendship.
Trump was invited to have a curry in the city of Bradford, where about a quarter of the population is Muslim, and go on a walkabout in the multi-ethnic area of Brixton, a neighborhood in south London. More than one politician invited him to come along for a visit to a mosque.
So, you feel threatened by the fact that Trump was willing to speak out against Islam, because you enjoy the fact that your country has been nigh completely conquered by a hostile foreign entity.
And your solution is to convert Trump to Islam?
How is this real?
But British politicians were notably less courteous when searching for words to describe the Republican presidential front-runner, with lawmakers from across the political spectrum dishing up a dictionary’s worth of insulting names.
“An idiot,” is how Gavin Newlands, a Scottish National Party politician, described Trump, despite his attempts to find more agreeable language.
“I have tried to find different, perhaps more parliamentary adjectives to describe him but none was clear enough. He is an idiot,” he said.
Yeah.
He’s one of those dumb self-made billionaires. Lots of them running around in America.
There were some very British insults as well. If Trump were to pop into one of the many “excellent” pubs in her constituency, the Conservative member Victoria Atkins said he would likely be called a “wazzock” — British slang for an annoying person.
Why are there pubs in an Islamic State?
That isn’t halal. Neither are female politicians halal.
You appear to be going through some difficult emotions during this period of handing off your country to these hajis, Britain.
She said that banning Trump would be a disproportionate response but also said his call last month to temporarily ban Muslims from entering the the United States was “bonkers.”
Yep, completely “bonkers.”
Because why would anyone want to give up the benefits of welfare leeching brown stink-monkeys – the benefits of which include but maybe are not even limited to kebab shops – just because they’re murdering you on the streets and raping every woman they see?
Clearly Trump is no mathematician, or he’d see that blocking millions of parasite welfare leeches simply because most of them are terrorists and/or gang-rapists just doesn’t add up, if we do a basic cost-benefit analysis.
Although Britons are normally famous for their understatement, they didn’t appear to hold back during the debate, which was triggered after more than 575,000 people signed a petition on a parliamentary website calling to ban Trump from Britain.Gavin Robinson, a Northern Irish member of Parliament who said that Trump should be allowed to visit Britain so that people could challenge his views, nonetheless branded him a “ridiculous xenophobe” and a “buffoon.”
Keir Starmer, a Labour politician and former chief prosecutor, disagreed that Trump was a buffoon. “That is not buffoonery. That is absolutely repugnant,” he said.
Naz Shah, the Labour politician who invited Trump to join her for a curry, said he was a “demagogue who panders to people’s fears, rather than their strengths.”
Yes.
You are absolutely correct, Naz.
Moslems have many, many strengths.
Here are just three examples:
And I could show you tens of thousands of pictures of other strengths.
Is it really worth sacrificing these strengths so you don’t get randomly murdered on the streets?
Trump is “not only racist but homophobic and misogynistic,” said Rupa Huq, a Labour politician.
To Marcus Fysh, a Conservative politician who said that banning Trump would be counterproductive, he was “the orange prince of American self-publicity.”
Labour shadow minister Jack Dromey, one of the few members of Parliament who argued in favor of the ban — Trump shouldn’t be allowed within a thousand miles of Britain, is how he put it — said that Trump was a “fool” but that he wasn’t free to be a “dangerous fool in Britain.”
Labour member Tulip Siddiq, another lawmaker who supported the ban, said that Britain needed to prevent “a poisonous, corrosive man from entering our country.”
Americans claim that you cannot Stump the Trump. But today in Britain we learned that you cannot slap the kebab.
