Harvard Punishes Students Who Belong to “Single-Gender” Clubs

Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
December 10, 2017

Who wouldn’t pay $200k to attend a school that constantly fucks with you?

Colleges can’t seem to stop their accelerating plunge into becoming total SJW hellholes. Not only have all of these places been integrated, both by gender and race, for decades, but now it seems they’re pushing to integrate even the student’s private lives – against their will.

This is just another way they have of pushing away normal White men from attending. What’s going to happen to Harvard’s reputation when all of their graduates are Shanequa’s and Tyrones? Do they think they’ll keep their prestige and reputation after they consistently pump out worthless degenerates with “gender studies” degrees?

Campus Reform:

Harvard University announced Tuesday that it will formally adopt an interim policy forbidding students from serving in leadership roles if they belong to unrecognized single-gender clubs.

Outgoing President Drew Faust and Harvard Corporation fellow William F. Lee shared the news via email, reporting that the Corporation—not the faculty, as expected—had voted to maintain the school’s existing policy on unrecognized single-gender social organizations (USGSOs), which has been in place on an interim basis since May 2016.

“Under the policy, students may decide to join a USGSO and remain in good standing,” a statement attached to the email asserts, though it also cautions that “decisions often have consequences, as they do here in terms of the students’ eligibility for decanal endorsements and leadership positions supported by institutional resources.”

Blah blah blah “discrimination” blah blah blah “diversity” blah blah blah…

USGSO’s refer mainly to fraternities and sororities. In other words, organizations outside the jurisdiction of the school, which students join voluntarily in their own spare time.

So this policy makes members of these fraternities second-class students ineligible for leadership positions and other privileges. Of course, because of the wording of the policy, it only applies to fraternities that are segregated by gender.

The fact is that Harvard has been pressuring all these groups into allowing women (and vice-versa) since the 80’s. In response, they dropped all official association with the school. So now, the college is trying to destroy them from the outside.

I wonder why colleges would have a problem with this. Hmmm…

Reiterating that “the policy does not discipline or punish the students,” but rather “recognizes that students who serve as leaders of our community should exemplify the characteristics of non-discrimination and inclusivity that are so important to our campus,” the Corporation’s statement emphasizes its belief that the policy preserves “agency and choice” while balancing competing interests.

“Yeah we’re not punishing them or anything, just taking away their leadership roles and making them out to be moral defectives.”

“Not a punishment.”

In November 2016, the Crimson determined that 60 percent of undergraduate students favored lifting the sanctions on USGSO members, a figure that had risen to 61 percent by the time of a second poll last month.

Of course, the school isn’t adopting this policy because the students want it, but merely to push their political agenda. They don’t want outside groups influencing the minds of their students and potentially affecting their brainwashing program.

They also want to eliminate all “male-only” spaces. You can be 100% sure that if there were only sororities, they wouldn’t even care. But of course, they love spaces where “straight White males” are excluded, calling them “safe” spaces.