House Intelligence Committee Votes to End Russian Hoaxspiracy Kookquest

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 22, 2018

This is like if a guy hires a hooker and then he can’t get an erection but he keeps trying for like a hour then he finally starts crying and puts his clothes back on.

Wow that is a really vulgar analogy.

But is it not the TRUTH?

RT:

The House Intelligence Committee has voted to formally end its Russia probe. Lawmakers found no evidence of collusion between associates of President Donald Trump and Russia.

The committee also voted to release the report, which was authored by Republicans. It will first be sent to the intelligence community so that classified material can be redacted, but is expected to be made public within weeks.

The report recommends a crackdown on administrative leaks including the introduction of “mandatory polygraphs” for officials who have top secret security clearance. It also accuses former Obama administration intelligence director James Clapper of providing “inconsistent testimony” regarding his contacts with the media.

M A N D A T O R Y P O L Y G R A P H S

And yeah, “inconsistent testimony” is also called “lying under oath.”

Which is nothing new for James Clapper.

Everyone knew he lied about the spying, he admitted it, but he wasn’t charged because, well… because Israel is our greatest ally and the only democracy in the Middle East, maybe.

In a summary of its findings, the committee said that some Trump associates had “ill-advised” contact with WikiLeaks but concluded that there was “no evidence of collusion between President Donald Trump’s associates and the Kremlin.”

The committee spoke to more than 70 witnesses during the course of the investigation, which was launched in January last year. It heard from many prominent Trump administration figures including Donald Trump Jr., Jared Kushner and Steve Bannon. It also reviewed more than 300,000 documents.

Democrats have complained that Republicans on the committee failed to subpoena documents, interview key people or force uncooperative witnesses to answer questions. “It really is a fundamentally flawed document and there’s not much that can rescue it,” California Democrat Adam Schiff said after the vote.

In a statement after the committee approved the report chairman Devin Nunes said the report “provides specific findings and recommendations to improve our election security before the mid-term elections.”

So there you have it.

Ball’s in your court, Bob.

What’s your move?