Internet Activism vs Street Activism

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 30, 2015

A political movement is not about individuals or groups of people.  It is about a monolithic idea.
This is not about individuals or groups of people. It is about a monolithic idea.  No one can tell you what that idea is.  You have to figure it out for yourself.

There has been an ongoing debate within pro-White circles about the value of internet activism vs. the value of real life street activism.

Firstly, I will admit that I like to do what I feel I’m good at.  I  don’t have any ability or interest in organizing street protests or political parties, but I have a pretty good grasp of the way the internet works.

I understand the argument that internet activism is a worthless circlejerk and ultimately an admission of defeat, but I believe that there is a lack of an understanding of what exactly internet activism should be.

The internet is now where people go to have their realities shaped, in the way that they used to go to the television.  The ability to influence someone’s core perceptions of reality is obviously a very powerful thing, if it is taken advantage of.  Saying “oh no, no reason to mess with it, let’s go out on the street and hold up signs instead,” then going on to complain that the world is hopeless because not enough people are out in the streets holding up signs, strikes me as much more defeatist than making a genuine attempt to use the vast potential of the internet to influence the minds of potentially millions of people.

If you read this site with any regularity, you are aware that I focus on continually pressing certain memes, over and over and over again.  This is a method by which, through repetition, you are able to give a person a lens through which they view reality.  They then spread these memes both through various different internet outlets as well as in the real world.  This exponential dissemination of simple and yet very powerful ideas, as it builds momentum, can continue to expand indefinitely.

This concept has been written about somewhat extensively throughout academia.  It is called “memetics.”

Wikipedia:

Memetics is a theory of mental content based on an analogy with Darwinian evolution, originating from the popularization of Richard Dawkins’ 1976 book The Selfish Gene. Proponents describe memetics as an approach to evolutionary models of cultural information transfer.

The meme, analogous to a gene, was conceived as a “unit of culture” (an idea, belief, pattern of behaviour, etc.) which is “hosted” in the minds of one or more individuals, and which can reproduce itself, thereby jumping from mind to mind. Thus what would otherwise be regarded as one individual influencing another to adopt a belief is seen as an idea-replicator reproducing itself in a new host. As with genetics, particularly under a Dawkinsian interpretation, a meme’s success may be due to its contribution to the effectiveness of its host.

Memetics is also notable for sidestepping the traditional concern with the truth of ideas and beliefs. Instead, it is interested in their success.

This is the exact method which was used to create the social justice movement.  This was done on the internet.  Now it is basically the dominant ideology of the entire Western establishment.

The rate at which the internet has accelerated the spread of liberal thought-forms is mind-boggling.  Because Jews are clever people, and they saw the end of an age of standing out in the streets with signs, and moved into the age of viral electronic information as a means to shape reality.

Along with the basic distribution of memes, the internet provides us with the ability to create massive spectacles which get picked up by the larger media. During the operation against Luciana Berger, the Stormer Troll Army was able to get the words “filthy Jew bitch” printed on virtually all mainstream news sites, and what’s more, the masses of people in the comments sections sided with our right to express our political views on the internet, even while knowing that we were distributing a message of “virulent” anti-Semitism.

Though all credit goes to God and the Troll Army, this operation meant more for White activism than anything I’m aware of having gone down since the death of William Pierce.

I can say that I am the only person who has attempted to apply these concepts to right-wing ideology (save for Alex Jones, if you want to consider him “right wing”).  It wasn’t some kind of massive connection to make here.  Shockingly, no one else has even attempted to get on board with this concept, save my own readers, and instead we have endless moaning about how we need to “get out in the streets.”

And yet, there is no plan as to what we are to be doing in the streets.  If I was trying to organize street protests – again, I am not trying to do that as I have other goals that I am focused on – the first thing I would have is a clear list of political goals/demands.  “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore” is not an obtainable objective that you can rally people around.  At the same time, very few are inspired by the idea of randomly finding trigger-issues and standing up against them with placards.

This is clearly why no one shows up to street protests.  They appear to an outsider to have been formulated to purposefully fail.

Again, all you have to do is watch how the other side behaves and repeat that behavior.  The homosexual rights movement, for instance, has for 25 years had a list of demands, and they have then proceeded to get these demands met by working out the most efficient possible way to organize their people for this purpose. They were supported by Jewish memes distributed through popular electronic culture.

To be fair, the anti-abortion movement has followed this pattern of street organization correctly, and yet been overwhelmed.  The reason that they were overwhelmed was that the Jews are the only people using the reality-shaping media technologies for the purpose of framing the issue in the minds of the masses with simplified memes.  “Right to choose” won out over “right to life” because the meme was better disseminated and attached to larger emotional triggers. It never mattered which was more moral or truthful or best for society, because that isn’t the way this game works.

Both internet activism and street activism are valid methods of resisting the hell that is coming down on us  and I think the goal needs to be for them to work in tandem with clear objectives. I wish more people were involved in the use of memes to spread our ideology on the internet, but I believe it will pick up. On the street side, both National Action in Britain and National Youth Front in America are making good progress.

I see a lot of reasons to be positive. And I am certain that no one ever got anything done by talking about how no one is doing anything.