Is the Establishment Planning Some Kind of Coup?

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 11, 2016

I’m a wee bit startled by the aggression with which the media, the CIA and the Obama administration are pushing this “Russia did Wikileaks” thing, guys.

Because they have already said this. They said it months before the election – within hours of the DNC leaks dropping, it was all through the media that Russia was responsible, and then the intelligence agencies – including the CIA – backed it up.

It was an ongoing thing. Hillary said it every time she appeared publicly.

But they didn’t say that the election had to be canceled because of it – because there were documents showing that Clinton and the party were just a bunch of scam artists.

So why are they bringing this up again now as if it is some new thing?

The whole media is demanding that “something be done” – the New York Times is irate, demanding there be endless investigations to prove that Russia is “undermining American democracy.” But what does that even mean? Where is this intended to be going, other than toward some kind of attempt to declare the election invalid?

Fox News:

Donald Trump’s presidential transition team late Friday criticized President Obama’s order for a full-scale review of campaign-season cyber-attacks allegedly linked to Russia, saying it’s “time to move on.”

Trump has been repeatedly dismissive of the intelligence community’s determination that Russia sought through hacking to disrupt the U.S. election, which he won in a stunning upset over Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton.

“The election ended a long time ago in one of the biggest Electoral College victories in history. It’s now time to move on and `Make America Great Again,’ ” the transition team said. “These are the same people that said Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.”

The investigation ordered by Obama will be a “deep dive” into a possible pattern of increased “malicious cyber activity” timed to the campaign season, White House spokesman Eric Schultz said Friday.

On Saturday, New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, the next Senate minority leader, called for the Republican-led Congress to address the issue.

“Reports of the CIA’s conclusion that Russia actively sought to help elect Donald Trump are simultaneously stunning and not surprising, given Russia’s disdain for democracy and admiration for autocracy,” Schumer said. “Senate Democrats will join with our Republican colleagues next year to demand a congressional investigation and hearings to get to the bottom of this.”

The administration probe will include looking into the email hacks that rattled the presidential campaign. It also will look at the tactics, targets, key actors and the U.S. government’s response to the hacks, as well as incidents reported in past elections,.

The president ordered the report earlier in the week and asked that it be completed before he leaves office next month, Schultz said.

The Washington Post reported Friday that the CIA has concluded that Russia aimed specifically to help Trump, a Republican, win the presidency.

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations.

…

Schultz said the president sought the probe as a way of improving U.S. defense against cyberattacks and was not intending to question the legitimacy of Trump’s victory.

Obama’s move comes as Democratic lawmakers have been pushing Obama to declassify more information about Russia’s role, fearing that Trump, who has promised a warmer relationship with Moscow, may not prioritize the issue.

The White House said it would make parts of the report public and would brief lawmakers and relevant state officials on the findings.

It emphasized the report would not focus solely on Russian operations or email hacks involving Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta and Democratic National Committee accounts. The emails were made public by WikiLeaks.

Schultz said intelligence officials would be reviewing incidents going back to the 2008 presidential campaign, when the campaigns of Sen. John McCain and Obama were breached by hackers.

…

Trump senior adviser Kellyanne Conway told “Fox & Friends” on Friday that Democrats “won’t learn the lessons” from the 2016 race.

“A little self-awareness would do for a team that is blaming everybody but themselves for this. It’s Bernie Sanders’ fault … It’s the alt-right’s fault,” she said. “It’s … fake news’ fault. It’s Russian interference. It’s James Comey. … How about you had no message?”

Fox News’ Chad Pergram, Jake Gibson and Catherine Herridge and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Here’s an ex-CIA analyst attacking Trump for not entertaining this gibberish.

Here’s a Trumpist arguing with a CNN guy about it (look who’s at the end of the clip!):

Here’s a CIA analyst saying we need a new election.

Clearly, this is what the media is pushing for, but it’s unlikely that intelligence agencies and Obama would actually just declare the election invalid.

It’s not impossible though, is it?

I mean, with Pizzagate going on – and also being declared Russian propaganda – and this bill in Congress to try and outlaw free speech… it’s not out of the question that some very desperate people are considering some very desperate measures.

You can imagine the situation of an actual satanic baby-rapist about to get exposed. Or maybe you can’t imagine that. But you can imagine that such a person would be very, very desperate, and ready to try anything. Because being a satanic baby-rapist on the verge of being exposed to the world is the definitive “nothing to lose” situation.