Jared Taylor Responds to Bizarre Evan Osnos Anti-Trump Piece

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 26, 2015

Evan Osnos approaches journalism from a "quantity over content" position.
Evan Osnos approaches journalism from a “quantity over content” position.

Jared Taylor has written up a long piece in response to Evan Osnos piece in the New Yorker attacking all Trump supporters as White supremacist Neo-Nazis.

AmRen:

The New Yorker has just published a 7,500-word article about Donald Trump, except it’s not really about Donald Trump. Two thirds of it is about Mr. Trump’s supporters–including me–and that’s what explains the title: “The Fearful and the Frustrated” [August 31, 015]. New Yorker readers can feel smug without even reading the article; Mr. Trump appeals to losers, just as they have always thought.

Yeah, I doubt very many people actually read the article. It is like reading chapters from Leviticus (wink-wink). It is literally 7,500 words long, and contains no ideas. I actually read it twice, because I was trying to figure out what exactly was going on, but the fact is he could have communicated the same amount of info in one sentence:

“Trump supporters are stupid and evil racists.”

The author Evan Osnos, [Email him] is a veteran journalist and has been with the New Yorker for seven years. After weeks of following Mr. Trump around and talking to his fans, he announces that Mr. Trump is “expanding the discourse of hate,” that his core supporters are “the portion of the electorate that is drifting deeper into unreality,” that he could unleash “anti-democratic politics,” and that he appeals directly to “the crude tribalism that Richard Hofstadter named ‘the paranoid style’.”

After writing “drifting deeper into unreality,” he might as well have just started mooing.

What a monster! New Yorker readers can feel delightfully superior not only to Mr. Trump but to the unhinged primitives who might actually vote for him–that is to say, the 55 percent of white men who say that would back him over Hillary Clinton.

The article is a perfect example of blinkered, self-congratulatory journalism. It makes no effort actually to understand anything. Mr. Osnos does quote one or two key ideas of Mr. Trump’s supporters but he pees on them from a very great height rather than try to refute them.

“Blinkered, self-congratulatory” – yeah.

Osnos, instead of writing the article, could just as easily have filmed himself masturbating and posted screengrabs in the New Yorker, with the headline “Why Donald Trump supporters are evil.” The effect would have been the same. In fact, it would have been more meaningful than the 7,500 words of no content.

[The bit was removed for being overly vulgar. -ed.]

In June, when Mr. Osnos first asked to interview me he wrote to say that he was working on “a piece about race, in the wake of the Charleston event.” I thought this was an important subject so I invited him to my house. We spoke for two hours about Dylann Roof and what might have motivated him: race differences, immigration, and what demographic change means for America. Mr. Osnos assured me that he was “trying very hard to understand” dissident thinking, so I arranged for him come back to my house and meet several other racial dissidents.

Yeah, yeah, he emailed me too in this pretentious fashion where he tried not to be pretentious.

I didn’t respond, because I don’t respond to emails from Jews. I certainly don’t invite them to my house. Unless they work for Rolling Stone and have put in writing that they are going to put me on the cover wearing the Bane mask.

Hopefully, Jared Taylor has learned a lesson here. Jewish journalists care about “getting to the truth” about as much as a swarm of pidgins cares about the aesthetics of Central Park.

Anyway, it’s a great article Taylor has written, I recommend reading the whole thing just because it’s good. But everything in it is obvious.