Eric Striker
Daily Stormer
November 11, 2016

This entire election year, Jews have been gaslighting Goyim in a way we’ve never seen before. From the radical exterminationist rhetoric of Lena Dunham, to Jon Stewart going on TV telling white people that this is not our country, Jews have been working every last crevice and exploiting every position of influence to disenfranchise and agitate violence against us, and yet, none of the hundreds of organized body of Jews have come out to condemn their vitriolic, racist language (because they vocally or silently agree with it).

Yet, here we are on November 11th, successfully weathering the storm and asserting that America is the land of the white working people.  Suddenly, Jews no longer consider it a zero-sum game; suddenly they want to “understand” us now that they see there’s more of us than they thought.

NO!

If Clinton had won the election, every Jew in America would be popping party favors and shooting fireworks, with the front page of the New York Times proudly exclaiming “WHITE RACE DIES AT THE HANDS OF ASCENDANT AMERICA.” Jews in the press and intelligentsia would’ve seen this as a sign to up the ante, to start advocating more extreme and psychotic policies to hurt white working people. We can’t forgive this.

For all their talk of anti-Semitism, it is the Jews themselves who have made this a zero-sum game of who can exterminate who. They realize that the suspicious silence of the majority – missing from the football stadiums and cutting their cable – is not a sign of weakness, nor ignorance of what Jews are working together to do to us, but instead a silent rage accumulating in a bucket, ready to downpour on the time-enduring pests when they trot out their last straw.

Here, Jews are becoming introspective in the media: they’re ready to retrench for now and go back to the drawing board. Suddenly they want to negotiate with white working people, which means their power structure is in truly dire straits.

(((Emma Green))) writes for The Atlantic:

Either way, it underscored the ways in which Trump’s election has evoked the persistent Jewish nightmare: That America will become like Germany in 1938. Jews, who have a keen eye for the repetition of history, might be forgiven for worrying about the fragility of American democracy.

This is the scale of fear, grief, and anger about Trump in some Jewish communities across America. In Philadelphia, at least three synagogues held prayer services on Wednesday; congregations in a number of other cities, including Durham, North Carolina, and Washington, D.C., held similar events. “No matter who we voted for and how we are feeling this morning, we all know that we and our country are in desperate need of healing,” read the Facebook invite for an event at the Germantown Jewish Centre in north Philly. “We will sit together, sing together, pray together, and have a chance to share what is on our hearts with the support of the community.”

A woman was crying when I walked into the cavernous sanctuary of GJC on Wednesday night. Roughly 100 people were gathered in a circle of chairs toward the front of the room; the cream ceiling and warmly brown furniture gave the space a living-room feel. In the center of the gathering, a single candle sat burning on a small round table. The space was still except for the occasional baby squeal or patter of toddler feet at the side of the room; people had brought their children because, as someone on Facebook observed, they need to heal, too.

“As a Jewish person, I’m not as afraid of Trump because his own daughter is Orthodox,” one woman said, referring to Ivanka Trump. “This has exposed something we’ve been ignoring for too long,” said another, speaking about the racist and sexist comments exchanged during the campaign. There was a discussion of the stages of grief and talk of making aliyah, or emigrating to Israel—not as a plausible possibility, but as a back-of-mind option in case things get really bad. And yes, people brought up Nazi Germany.

Unlike Muslims, Mexicans, African Americans, the disabled, and women, Jews have not been directly insulted by Donald Trump during this election. Anti-Semites have arguably been empowered by his campaign: Jewish journalists have been consistently threatened and harassed on Twitter since the election got underway, often by people who self-identify as Trump supporters. But the fear seems to be less that Trump will specifically persecute Jews than the sense that America under Trump will become an increasingly hostile space for Jews and other minority groups. Trump doesn’t have to be an anti-Semite to bear responsibility for anti-Semitism.

This clustering creates a dual challenge for Jewish communities. People at GJC spoke about Trump’s election like they might about a death in the family—with a sense of real and personal loss, and a staggering alienation from their fellow Americans. “It is kind of shattering to people to feel like, wow, there’s such a difference,” said Zeff. “To think that racism, anti-immigrant sentiment, and misogyny could be given a pass by so many people makes Jews feel like anti-Semitism could also be given a pass.”

And yet the congregants also spoke about the need for understanding. “The people for whom this is a happy day—we have to think about them, too,” Zeff said during the prayer service. Mt. Airy is about a half hour drive from Bucks County, a swing area in Pennsylvania where nearly half of voters went for Trump this year. But even within such a short distance, it’s difficult to imagine how the liberal Jews of Philadelphia and the Trump supporters one county up would start to know one another or be in community.

Trump may feel pressured to reconcile with those who did everything in their power to stop him, but that doesn’t mean we have to. If you have one of these Synagogue congregations come to your community asking for “dialogue,” now that we have the leverage, spit in their face. If they ask you to obey by their political correctness taboos out of politeness now that we don’t have to, violate them even harder. This needs to be only the beginning of what is to come.

It’s not just Synagogues who are going back to the drawing board. Arguably, the biggest loser in the 2016 election isn’t Hillary Clinton, it’s the Judenpresse.

Take a look at the reactions from Jewish media moguls on why they failed to stop Trump from getting elected. Even though they give off a relatively cool and unattached demeanor, you can clearly read “I’m Literally Shaking!” in between the lines.

Politico:

The New York Times executive editor Dean Baquet: “I don’t buy that people wrote Trump off. I do think that we and the rest of the press corps weren’t completely in touch with, or understood the Trump voter. I think we need to do a better job going forward of explaining the divides that exist in America. I think we could do better writing about the people who voted for Donald Trump, understanding what drove them, their anxiety. I think it’s too simplistic to just see them as crazy people or deplorables. There aren’t that many deplorables in the United States. I think one of the biggest stories we all have to take on in the coming years is to understand that world better — the working class voters who feel like the forces of globalization and the rise of technology have left them behind. We need to understand that world better before there’s another election.”

Washington Post executive editor (((Marty Baron))): “There’s a lot that wasn’t normal about this election. From the very beginning, the press made a lot of assumptions about what would have an impact on the race. It turned out that we should be more careful about making assumptions bc a lot of our assumptions turned out to be incorrect. So that’s a lesson for us — perhaps before we presume that certain things will have a dramatic impact on an election, we need to do more reporting and talk to more people … Where I think that we should have done better and can do better in the future; I think we should have detected the depth of grievance and anxiety in America’s working class well before Trump became a candidate. It’s obviously our job to get out in the country and listen to people and to take the measure of the American public, and I don’t think we did as well as we should have, and we need to make sure we learn that lesson and make it a regular responsibility to really understand America’s working class.”

Univision chief news, digital and entertainment officer (((Isaac Lee))): “Sometimes when you’re seeing shots fired, it’s hard to know that they’re actually shooting at you. The media missed the anti-establishment tide overwhelming all of the western world because we were one of the main targets of the people’s ire. As journalists, we should’ve known better. Polling from PEW and Gallup show that trust in journalists is at an all time low. This has been an existential threat that we have failed to address. We live in the age of inequality. One of the outcomes of inequality is that we wall ourselves off and resent each other. We journalists lately have too often been holed up in elite areas of New York, Washington, Palo Alto, Miami, or LA. We didn’t realize that just a few miles away from us in places like Staten Island and Homestead, the people were there were hopeless and also hopeless about us. If we are to regain their trust we must move ourselves closer to the people. Remember who we are really supposed to serve (them), and hope to rebuild that relationship. It is on us.”

Gawker Media founder (((Nick Denton))): “The liberal media missed this for the same reason they missed Brexit: because they’re in the bubble. And they’re no longer a national institution, but the representatives of a class… Biggest question is what happens to TV. First thing that Putin did was to establish control over state and then private television. Telling the oligarchs they could keep their money so long as they stopped meddling with state power. So what’s the American equivalent? FCC regulation? Thiel consortium takes over Twitter? Punitive lawsuits? External conflict to prompt a rally-round-the-flag effect? An adversarial media did not persuade during this election campaign; in fact it may have reinforced the resentment of Trump voters. There’s no reason to believe condemnation and investigation will be any more effective during a Trump administration. If the Trumpists fail, it will be because they in turn over-reach.”

Former New York Times executive editor (((Jill Abramson))): “I think there has to be more attention paid to the immense gulf between elites and the rest of the country, and that’s going to be hard to report on because [mainstream news] institutions are obviously seen as pillars of what some people see as the elite.”

The Nation editor (((Katrina vanden Heuvel))): “I think one of the central factors was that the saturation coverage of Trump, certainly in those early critical months, the abetting of his rise… It wasn’t only that it was saturation coverage of Trump, but that it obscured a critical story of 2016, as we might understand this morning, which is that Americans are strikingly agitated not just about politics and governance but about an economic ‘recovery’ that never seems to reach them. I also think that it was an election about change and a revolt against political elites — [who] support global trade and tax deals of, by and for the corporations — [while] the consensus, almost suffocating consensus, in the mainstream media was in support of those trade deals or in support of a kind of neoliberal economics that has ravaged communities… “There was important coverage of his lies. They were holding him accountable for refusing to release his tax returns, for abuse of his foundation. But too often there was a false equivalence, often a symmetry drawn between Clinton and Trump as equal liars, which is wrong. But in the saturation coverage of Trump as unfit, the media for the most part wasn’t covering issues that were of real concern to people. So I do think there was a backlash effect against a media that was constantly denouncing Trump and by extension — and again I’m not speaking not of all Trump supporters but of many — it seemed by extension that the media was denouncing them or had contempt for them.”

(((Phil Boas))), editorial page director at The Arizona Republic: “It was the most amazing election night I’ve witnessed. It was an incredible story, electric. It was fascinating to watch the news anchors. The script they had prepared was burning before their eyes. It was amazing to watch that… Conventional wisdom died last night… One of the accusations against the media in general this cycle has been that they made trump, gave him all this free advertising. I don’t believe that. The great failure of the media this time was to not see this coming, to not do the spadework ahead of time to understand what was building up in the country, and in the world.”

“Noticiero Univision” anchor Maria Elena Salinas: “I don’t think just the media got it wrong, the media got it wrong, the democratic party got it wrong, the pollsters got it wrong, I think a lot of people got it wrong… All media needs to look at how they covered him beginning with how they allowed someone like Trump to call in and talk as long as he wants and say whatever he wants without questioning him. They didn’t begin to question some of the outrageous things he was saying till the end. It gave him a free pass when he was insulting people. I think with no doubt, if there is one thing we all agree on, is if at any time any other candidate said some of the things Donald Trump said, including calling the media low life losers and scum that would’ve disqualified them from the process. No one would have put up with it. Yet we laughed it off and said what a silly thing from this man.”

Daily Beast executive editor (((Noah Shachtman))): “I don’t think there’s any one explanation that can tell you why so many folks in the media missed this potential for a Trump win. I think it’s a combination of factors. I think the polling data being so wrong is certainly a major impact. That’s especially bad on us because we’ve seen so many instances, time and time again, of the polls being off, that we really ought to have known better. To me, the big one is we kind of had this trust that [voters] would ultimately judge Trump as a future leader of the free world and not by the metrics by whether he was kind of a naughty celebrity or not.”

The Forward editor (((Jane Eisner))): “So yeah, I did miss [the Trump phenomenon]. But I missed it because I didn’t think that it was there in our community. Clearly, nearly a quarter of American Jews voted for Trump, so there were lots of reasons for it.

Note: This is the new narrative Jews are emphasizing right now to stave off anti-Jew polarization. The Jewish vote for Trump was actually lower than the ‘Hispanic’ vote, and a higher percentage of Jews voted Hillary than white males without a college degree did for Trump (72%).

But I think that there were reasons different from what we’re learning about that vast middle of America that went for him. I think the reasons that Jews went for him was in large part more to do with the perceptions that he would be more supportive of the Netanyahu government. While Trump as a candidate was all over the place in the way he described his Mideast policy and his policy toward Israel really fluctuated through the course of the campaign, still the Republican party this year, for the first time in a while, took a much more right-wing stance, basically saying that it didn’t think a two-state solution was going to happen anytime soon. So for those Jews who are a minority, but a sizable minority, who are much more hawkish about their Israel policy when it comes to the United States, I think that’s what drew them to Trump, more than sort of being part of the forgotten working class.”

The consensus of these media Jews is that they need to study working and middle class white people like lab rats better in order to update their psychological profile, and thus propagandize us more efficiently against our own interests. At this point, they’re too late – they burned up all their credibility to stop Trump, and we need to continue discrediting every single thing they say.

The 800 lb Rabbi in the living room with this list of “media veterans” Politico consulted is that not one of these people is a white male, in fact, 8 out of 10 of them are Jewish. This, and this alone, explains the disconnect between the white majority and the establishment.

For years these people got away with murder. Now they missed the mark and we have the tip of the dagger to their black, shriveled-up little hearts. The only move from here is to muster all of your body weight and plunge it while you watch life slowly escape from the system’s dying gaze.

Now is the time to push forward and change American culture for good.  The only thing we have to lose is our chains.