Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Brett Light
Daily Stormer
November 7, 2013
Here we go again. Jews occupying the Land Down Under are on the attack, pushing for total censorship of the internet. David Singer, an Australian Jewish lawyer, is leading the charge, and recently published a bizarre and disgusting op-ed piece entitled “Anonymous Jew-hating cowards of the Internet” demanding that free speech be squelched through brutally organized, government-mandated witch hunts.
It never stops with these people:
The Internet has become one of the major contributors to the growing spread of Jew-hatred and assaults on Jews world wide.
The senseless attack by a group of hooligans in Bondi, Sydney last week bashing five Jewish people – one a 62 years old woman – as they were walking home after enjoying a Sabbath meal with friends – has resulted in an outpouring of world-wide condemnation by politicians, the media, the public and other religious groups.
Yet it is only one of an increasing number of such similar assaults on Jews world-wide.
Oh, these poor dears. Never doing anything wrong. Just quietly going about their business and being attacked by evil Antisemites! It is not as if Jews are responsible for looting our economy, corrupting our culture and bringing millions of nonwhite immigrants into our countries to rob, rape and kill us or anything like that. They are simply victims of everyone, everywhere. People hate them for literally no reason at all. It is very mysterious.
Jewish communities have for decades been required to place their synagogues, communal schools and organizations under 24 hour security surveillance.
The propensity of the Internet to become an uncontrolled vehicle for racial incitement has been allowed to escape under the radar. It is time that its capacity to so influence the minds of its readers was diminished.
What has become particularly disturbing is the ability of people to make whatever comments they like on the Internet without disclosing their full names and addresses to web editors when submitting their comments.
Why shouldn’t someone be able to make an anonymous comment, if a website decides to allow it? I wonder why these Jews would want our names and addresses, just because we’ve made internet comments? Oh wait, it’s because they want to sue us for telling the truth about their evil, terroristic behavior.
Newspapers require such details to be supplied – and only in exceptional circumstances will anonymous letters be published.
Why do Internet sites not demand the same standard of compliance?
Failure to do so has seen the publication of anonymous comments such as the following:
The Jews will still occupy the West Bank and blockade Gaza and continue with their brutal, genocidal occupation. If the world were to be rid of the U.S. and Israel, there would be a chance of peace in our chaotic, conflicted world. Surely, anyone with half a brain can see that!
Freedom of speech should not mean that people should enjoy freedom from prosecution or legal action for comments they make that defame people or groups of people or incite or are capable of inciting violence.
We might do well to remember the alleged Universal Declaration of Human Rights, coming from the U.N. (of all places):
Article 19: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.”
Of course, all documentation and spoken word from any U.N. body referring to ‘human rights’, is actually referring only to Jews as humans, since according to the Talmud, we (the non-Jews) are beasts:
“The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”
Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b
Returning to the Australian Jews anti-speech rant:
Should the following comment have been allowed to be anonymously posted?
Racist Israel is more than an abomination in the Middle East, it is a threat to the 7bn people it considers not to be racially “special”. Us. All the more reason to stop keeping it alive, and to target it with overwhelming nuclear might if it retaliates against civilisation for refusing to back its play. The Zionists may be blinded by their belief that God will protect them. Nobody and nothing will.
No doubt apologists will argue that objections can be lodged to delete offending comments – but its implementation inevitably leads to strident cries claiming censorship.
Securing the deletion of an objectionable comment also ignores the damage caused during the time that such comment has remained online before its removal.
These vile viewpoints – if authoritatively sourced – should be exposed to public gaze so that readers can understand the level and intensity of the hatred that exists – as exemplified in the following comment:
“Why should we [love Jews] given what they do to the Palestinians and have done since 1948? I don’t think that Jews are capable of love. Their religion gets in the road. Their god is loveless and punitive and so are they!”
Vile viewpoints, eh?
All that any of the ‘antisemitic comments’ quoted are doing is pointing our the objective fact that Israel is an occupational state built on stolen land by Jewish terrorists. The factual nature of these rather tame statements is precisely why this Jewish lawyer is demanding the implementation of Stalinist measures to combat them. Above all else, the Jew hates all things which are true, for the continued existence of the Jew is wholly dependent on an intricate web of abominable lies.
