Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
November 15, 2018
What’s wrong with these people?
Jews have always been at the core of the porn industry. Even more than that, they’ve been at the forefront of all efforts to make pornography legal, more accepted and more prevalent.
Why is that? Is it just that Jews are perverts, and would prefer if the goyim shared their vices in order to make them more comfortable? Well, they’re definitely perverts. But there’s more to it.
Jews are fully aware that pornography is psychologically damaging, and they use it as a weapon against gentiles.
At GQ this week, we have a Jew, Eva Wiseman, promoting the use of porn by young White men.
Wow, look at that schnoz!
You’d think she’d gloss over how destructive porn is. But instead, she admits that porn is ravaging young men’s libido and turning them into impotent, depressive soyboys – and says they should watch more of it!
GQ:
There is a moment in The Butterfly Effect, Jon Ronson’s epic and oddly moving podcast series about internet porn, that stayed with me. It’s the moment when, on the set of a porn film, an actor loses his erection mid-scene. This is not uncommon – the pressure to perform can soften the stiffest dick – but what surprised me was what the actor did next. He turned away from the woman, naked below him, in order to find his phone and search Pornhub to get himself hard again.
Here we see the kind of things this Jew finds “epic” and “oddly moving.”
Jon Ronson, by the way, is another Jew who is promoting porn.
A guy who’s been “investigating” porn for years now, and somehow never came across the ill health effects and still promotes its use.
At art college I picked up Andrea Dworkin’s Pornography, because I thought it might have rude bits. I was disappointed, but inadvertently learned about what Dworkin and her fellow Eighties activists threatened would happen if porn was not controlled: that men would begin to objectify women the way pornography did, encouraging incidents of rape and assault and inequality to rise. Then the internet happened and the prospect of limiting porn became an impossibility. But while unlimited free porn did change the world – and the world of desire in particular – it didn’t turn men into grabbing, rutting beasts. It did the opposite.
In 2003, Naomi Wolf visited campuses across the US to talk to students about sex. Women told her that in a “pornographised” world, rather than having all the sex, all the time, they found themselves unable to form sexual relationships with men. “For how can a real woman… possibly compete with a cybervision of perfection, downloadable and extinguishable at will?” Instead of encouraging sexual mayhem, as Dworkin predicted, Wolf concluded, “The onslaught of porn is responsible for deadening male libido in relation to real women.” Last year, Ronson reported a 1,000 per cent rise in erectile dysfunction in young men since 2007, the advent of free porn. Has online porn replaced sex itself?
It’s worth considering, isn’t it? And not just the effect of porn, but the digitalisation of all our sexual relationships, from gamified dating on Tinder to the advance of sex robots – a phrase I can’t type without also saying out loud in a movie trailer voice. Cultural analyst Sherry Turkle warns that we’re rapidly approaching a point where, “We may actually prefer the kinship of machines to relationships with real people.” A study by Stanford University says this might be because, as Newsweek put it, “Our brains aren’t necessarily hardwired for life in the 21st century.” Which is, well, a shame.
All this sounds pretty bad, doesn’t it?
Like, to the point where maybe we should start talking about banning porn altogether?
You know, like we used to?
That’s what you’d expect a gentile to say. But of course, we’re dealing with a Jew here.
Rather than banning porn, how about having more? More porn, from as many perspectives as possible. More acknowledgement that sexual health does not stop at an STI test. More time spent hacking away at the cultural insistence that women are either virgins or whores. More conversation about sex at a younger age, more stories of sex from a greater variety of viewpoints, more nuance, more women, more acknowledgement that, while some people spiral down the internet and crash, many others turn to technology, not just for release, but to explore love and desire from an increasingly lonely place. In The Butterfly Effect, Ronson meets a porn producer commissioned to make a video of a woman sitting on the floor, saying into the camera, “You are loved.” Porn is so ubiquitous it has gone beyond sex and into therapy.
Yes, even after all that, she still says society needs more porn. There isn’t even really an argument here – it’s just “oh, I’m sure more porn will somehow solve the problem, teehee!”
The porn addiction epidemic is nearly as bad as the opioid epidemic – and in some respects, it’s worse. If men are made into low-T wimps by porn, then every other problem in society will just get worse, with no one to do something about it.
There’s a growing awareness of just how destructive porn and masturbation is to physical and psychological health.
Jews are going into panic mode, pushing the message that porn is good and healthy in spite of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
They definitely don’t want a healthy, vigorous and virile population of gentile men on their hands after spending so much time and effort softening us up.
This GQ piece certainly puts all of the claims about the Frankfurt School – in particular, the work of Herbert Marcuse – into perspective, does it not? He literally wrote a book about how “sexual liberation” would stop anti-Semitism.
Another Frankfurt School Jew, Theodore Adorno, wrote a book about how breaking down the family unit would stop anti-Semitism.
What exactly is going on with these Jews?