Kike Bernstein Says Rat Friend Woodward’s Fake News Book “Indisputable”

Andrew Anglin September 5, 2018

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 5, 2018

Look at this:

Brian Stelter has changed the name of his column to “Reliable Sources.”

CNN and all these other outlets have to post everywhere effectively saying “seriously, we’re not lying this time – this is real news.”

Although I am feeling more positive toward CNN since this article had a pop-up add for Poppy Harlow’s podcast which seems to be trad af.

The kike Carl Bernstein worked with the alleged goy Bob Woodward to “expose” Watergate in 1973, and these two have been living off that ever since. Watergate actually did happen, so they ostensibly have credibility because they got leaked a story that turned out to be true.

So it isn’t surprising that they’re being dragged out of their retirement home to attack Trump.

The book has no real sources, all citations are anonymous or claimed by the author himself. So then you have his partner in crime – and yes, exposing Watergate was treason – coming out and saying “Oh yeah, you better believe this shit right here, goyim – this is the real shit.”

Stelter writes reliably for CNN:

The noise machine is really cranking up to challenge Bob Woodward’s book “Fear.” But the book is about something fundamental, something that’s hard for the pro-Trump media to fully counter. It’s about whether Trump is fit for office. The book is full of reasons to doubt his fitness. And it details a White House that isn’t just dysfunctional, but is downright broken. Here’s the very latest…

— “Fear” was #12 on Amazon BEFORE WaPo and CNN published excerpts around 11:15am Tuesday. By 5pm, the book was firmly #1, and it’s not going to budge for days…

— The publication date is still 9/11… Simon & Schuster is enjoying the pre-order spike…

— So far there’s been no known threat of legal action from Trumpworld, but I’m on the lookout because that’s what happened with “Fire and Fury” and “Unhinged…”

— All three books “tell basically the same story, it’s just that Woodward has by far the most credibility of those three,” Chris Hayes said on MSNBC. “It’s basically an ‘even worse than you thought’ sort of theme…”

— For the time being, Trump is trying a “fake news” defense, claiming (without a shred of evidence) that Woodward might have made up the stories in the book…

Yeah, see that – it is on Trump to provide evidence that claims made without any evidence are untrue.

This has all just gotten so goofy, it’s hard to process.

— Will “he made it up!” really work against one of the most-respected, well-known reporters in the country? Maybe…

He is only well-known because of a story form 1973.

And even the Watergate reporting was probably mostly fake or at least exaggerated.

Look at his Wikipedia.

Calling him “most-respected” would seem nonsensical, but it’s journalism. It’s like saying he’s one of the “most-respected” crack dealers in the hood. I have no idea who respects him or why, but journalists are not respected people.

— WaPo’s Josh Dawsey tweeted: “Of 13 current and former White House officials I spoke to today, seven said they spoke to Bob Woodward for his book…”

So Washington Post has anonymous sources who claim to be anonymous sources for this book.

Ya don’t say.

Bernstein calls the book “indisputable”

There was something special about listening to Carl Bernstein analyze Woodward’s bombshells on CNN on Tuesday.

Bernstein’s main point to Anderson Cooper: “Yes, there’s been reporting on this, a good deal of it. But now we have a coherent, indisputable narrative that is absolutely chilling in the following way: The people closest to the president of the United States, in his W.H. and in his administration, are saying that they see their job as protecting the United States FROM the president of the United States. That he is a danger to the republic. That is the text of this book. Every meeting that Bob writes about, that is the subtext. And it’s not just a sentence here or somebody calling somebody an idiot there, it is detail piled upon detail…”

Bernstein also vouched for Woodward’s reporting talent as only Bernstein could do. “This is an irrefutable picture, because of Bob Woodward’s methodology,” he told Brooke Baldwin earlier in the day…

Here’s that.

Even if you don’t think this guy is just a lying rat kike, surely he’s obviously too old to have any idea what’s going on.

And here’s where they admit there are no actual sources for any of it.

“Dozens of deep throats”

Robert Costa and Philip Rucker published the first excerpts in a WaPo story. CNN’s Jeremy Herb, Jamie Gangel and Dan Merica followed with another eye-popping story just a few minutes later. Together, the two story formed the basis for a full day of news coverage, criticism, denials, etc.

Gangel made this point on “AC360:” Woodward had “dozens of sources,” dozens of so-called deep throats. “He has hundreds of hours of taped interviews, almost every interview was taped… So people may be denying things now for their own reason. Maybe they’re denying it because they do consider themselves ‘the thin blue line,’ and they feel that it’s more important that they be in the job. But there are tapes.”

“Deep Throat” was an anonymous FBI source who was not revealed until 2005 (as Mark Felt, the Associate Director). Furthermore, it is generally believe that there were multiple sources, probably most of which were Jews. Kissinger could have been one of them. Felt only admitted being Deep Throat when he had dementia.

None of the interviews were taped, and it was later revealed that Woodward and Bernstein’s tales of meeting him in a secret garage were faked and he actually just called him on the phone.

Furthermore, “Deep Throat” was either lying to the reporters or they lied about what he said. Much of it has been discredited. But like the Holocaust, they have just disregarded everything that was reported by these two and proven to be false and focused on the Watergate Hotel break-in (which did actually happen).

Woodward just makes shit up and gets caught. It’s his entire career.

He even SUPPORTED Bush’s claim that Saddam had WMD, before then saying he didn’t after everyone knew that.

I very, very much doubt that any senior White House official agreed to be taped for this book. Why on earth would they do that? And if they have the tapes, why are they not just releasing them immediately?

They are claiming “oh yes, we have secret tapes, we might even show them to you some day, but until then, you just have to take our word for it” because they know that no one really trusts this “anonymous sources” bullshit anymore.

But secret tapes they’re not going to release are no better than anonymous sources – it is just more “trust me, goyim.”

The book will be headlines for ten days or so, then it will disappear. Guaranteed.

© Copyright Daily Stormer 2023, All Rights Reserved -- Join the Daily Stormer site chat for future updates in case of further domain seizure.