Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
The New Observer
January 13, 2016
Liberal excuses for the recent criminal behavior of refugee-invaders in Europe have reached dizzyingly new heights—and include claims that they are more educated than Europeans, that Mohammed was a feminist, and that “cultural differences” in understanding sex crimes show that it is racist to believe in “right and wrong.”
The collection of astounding claims sounds so ridiculous that they might have come out of some far-fetched comedy sketch—except that they are deadly real and have all been propagated in the controlled media in Europe.
An article in Austria’s Die Presse newspaper, for example, informs its readers that the government’s Public Employment Service (Arbeitsmarktservice Österreich, AMS) has carried out a “competency check” survey with “refugees” in Vienna.
The results of this “survey”—which consisted of asking 898 “refugees” what their educational qualifications were—showed, said Socialist Party Minister of Social Affairs, Rudolf Hundstorfer, that the “refugees have a significantly higher level of education than the Austrians.”
Ignoring the fact that the “refugees” have no papers or proof of their claims, Hundstorfer and his enthusiastic supporters claims that of the 898 “refugees,” 23 percent have university degrees, and 27 percent have Masters’ degrees—a higher proportion than the general Austrian population.
This, Hundstorfer, claimed, was proof that these people were going to be successfully integrated into Austrian society and soon enter the labor market to “reduce social welfare costs.”
The findings contradict all proper German studies on the topic of “refugee” education and employability. Research by the Kiel-based Institute for World Economy (IfW) earlier revealed that less than 2 percent of the “refugees” stand any chance of even low level employment.
Furthermore, Professor Ludger Wößmann, director of the Ifo Center for the Economics of Education in Munich, in an interview with Die Zeit newspaper, said that his research had shown that most of the invaders have a “miserable” education, and that at least two-thirds of them cannot even read or write.
Describing them as “functionally illiterate,” Professor Wößmann said that “two-thirds of students in Syria have very limited reading and writing ability. They can only solve the simplest of arithmetic problems. This means that these students, even if they have learned German, will barely be able to follow a school curriculum.”
Die Presse ended its review of the Vienna survey by asking the obvious question: how did the AMS survey know that the “refugees” were telling the truth when they claimed to have all this higher education?
The answer was provided by Vienna AMS Director Petra Draxl, who admitted that there was no proof at all but, she said, “we assume that people have not lied to us.”
Meanwhile in the official journal of Germany’s state-funded Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (Federal Agency for Civic Education), Mohammed has been posited as a feminist in an article supposedly showing how liberated women are under Islam.
Written by a mixed Indian-German Muslim living in Germany, Khola Maryam Pretty, the article in this journal says that “so far there is no evidence to suggest that there has been an increase in sexual harassment from refugees against German women.”
Clearly, Ms. Pretty has not been reading the German newspapers, but she then goes on to tell her readers that “Muhammad, the Prophet of Islam, tried, despite fierce opposition, to fight against the oppression of women.”
Ms. Pretty adds that Muhammad’s first wife, Khadija, was an “emancipated, successful clerk,” and that there is actually a “worldwide movement of Muslim feminists” who “use the teachings of Islam as a remedy against patriarchal structures.”
Finally, Ms. Pretty assures her readers that the idea that Islam oppresses women comes from “right-wing activists.”
The final piece of liberal insanity comes from Norway, where a three-year-old boy was raped at a “refugee” center housing some 800 nonwhite invaders—but absolutely no witnesses have come forward to provide any evidence to the frustrated police investigators.
The child rape took place in the open area at the Forus Akuttinnkvartering center in Stavanger on January 6, and despite hundreds of people being present, police superintendent Bjørn Kåre Dahl had to admit that they have no suspects, only a victim.
The explanation for this refusal to even admit that anything is wrong with child rape is one of the reasons why the deluded Norwegian liberals have started offering “asylum-seeker” classes in “Western sexual norms.”
Linda Hagen of Hero, a private company that runs 40 percent of Norway’s invader centers, said of the classes that “There’s no single cultural code to say what is good or bad behavior because we want a free society. There has to be tolerance for attitudes that may be seen as immoral by some traditional or religious norms.”
An earlier report on these “sex classes” revealed that the liberals, in an effort to “avoid stigmatizing immigrants,” had reversed the role of sexual predators in their “educational materials” to be a white Norwegian—in other words, they will actually tell the nonwhites that Norwegian men are the rapists who have to “learn how to behave.”
With “liberal values” such as these three examples outlined above, some observers might be forgiven for thinking that current western civilization deserves to die.
