Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 1, 2016
I ain’t even no, lol.
A staggering 71% of Democrats believe that Hillary should not drop out of the race if she is indicted over her email scandal. Presumably, the remaining 29% are hardcore Bernie supporters – meaning that 100% of Hillary’s supporters have no problem with a massive criminal scandal, which could literally result in decades of prison time.
Most continue to believe likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton is a lawbreaker, but half of all voters also say a felony indictment shouldn’t stop her campaign for the presidency.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 43% of Likely U.S. Voters think Clinton should immediately stop campaigning if she is charged with a felony in connection with her use of a private e-mail server while secretary of State. Fifty percent (50%), however, think she should continue running until a court determines her guilt or innocence.
Voters were evenly divided on this question in January, but at that time we didn’t include the name of any candidate.
Among Democratic voters, 71% believe Clinton should keep running, a view shared by only 30% of Republicans and 46% of voters not affiliated with either major party.
Forty percent (40%) of all voters say they are less likely to vote for Clinton because of the e-mail issue, while nearly half (48%) say it will have no impact on their vote. Just eight percent (8%) say the issue makes them more likely to vote for the former first lady.
Sixty-five percent (65%) consider it likely that Clinton broke the law by sending and receiving e-mails containing classified information through a private e-mail server while serving as secretary of State. This includes 47% who say it’s Very Likely. These findings are unchanged from January. Thirty percent (30%) still say Clinton is unlikely to have broken the law with the e-mail arrangement, with 16% who say it’s Not At All Likely.
Clinton purposefully violated Top Secret security procedures, and left the entirety of this information open to every government on the planet, as well as just any random hacker who was interested.
The bigger question is why she did it. And this isn’t really getting asked.
I don’t know anyone who uses a private email server. This isn’t really a thing. You would have to be involved in some very serious criminal business to think taking that kind of risk made sense.
There’s also the fact of how stupid this was, which also never really gets addressed. For less than $10,000 (probably significantly less), she could have had some serious hack setup a seriously secure secret server. Instead, she had no security whatsoever. It was just on the open internet, literally registered at clintonmail.com.
What is this woman’s IQ?