Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
December 6, 2013
The EU organization for combating racism has dropped their previous definition of the word ‘Antisemitism,’ and now says they have no idea what the word means.
As an Antisemite, I am deeply offended by this lack of understanding of who I am as a person, and demand that the EU adopt my definition of the word:
Antisemitism is when a person does not believe that Jews have a right to live inside other peoples’ nations and dictate the way they are run, while engaging in subversive social manipulation and financial parasitism. Antisemites believe Jews should live in their own country, and not be involved in manipulating the affairs of other peoples.
From the JTA:
“We are not aware of any official definition [of anti-Semitism],” Blanca Tapia of the EU’s Fundamental Rights Agency told JTA on Tuesday.
Tapia was answering a query on the recent removal from the agency’s website of a “working definition” of anti-Semitism that was adopted in 2005 by the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia — the EU entity that her organization has replaced. The removal was first reported by the pro-Palestinian website Electronic Intifada.
Campaigners against anti-Semitism said the document is significant because alongside classical anti-Semitic behavior, it lists the vilification of Israel or Israelis, which some scholars call “new anti-Semitism.” The definition lists “claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor” and drawing comparisons between Israel and Nazis as examples of anti-Semitism.
But Tapia said her organization had never viewed the document as a valid definition. Agency officials said the document had been pulled offline “together with other non-official documents.”
Shimon Samuels of the Simon Wiesenthal Center told JTA that the agency’s “disowning of its own definition is astounding” and that “those who fight anti-Semitism have lost an important weapon.” He also said the “Union’s about-face on its own definition damages its credibility.”
