LOL: Kerry Admits Defeat, Says the US will Eventually Have to Talk to Assad

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
March 15, 2015

Man, these are difficult times to be a political commentator, I’ll tell ya what.

BBC:

The United States will “have to negotiate in the end” with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, Secretary of State John Kerry has said.

Speaking on the fourth anniversary of the civil war, Mr Kerry said the conflict was “one of the worst tragedies any of us have seen”.

He said the US was pushing President Assad to begin negotiations again after two previous rounds of talks collapsed.

More than 215,000 people are estimated to have been killed in the conflict.

The US was working hard to “re-ignite” efforts to find a political solution to end the war, Mr Kerry said in an interview in the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-Sheikh.

What does this mean? Apparently, it is an admission of having lost the war, wherein they have been funding ISIS and others to fight against Assad because… wait, why were they funding these terrorists against Assad again? I honestly just completely forgot. I know they said he gassed people, but that was after they had already been funding these terrorists and were trying to drum-up support for a US ground invasion to back up ISIS.

What was the initial reason for starting the civil war? Did they even give one?

Here’s the Wikipedia explanation:

The Syrian Civil War (Arabic: الحرب الأهلية السورية al-Ḥarb al-Ahlīyah as-Sūrīyah‎, Arabic pronunciation: [ʔalˈħaɾb ʔalʔahˈliːja ʔas.suːˈɾiːja]), also known as the Syrian Revolution, is an ongoing armed conflict taking place in Syria. The unrest began in the early spring of 2011 within the context of Arab Spring protests, with nationwide protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government, whose forces responded with violent crackdowns. The conflict gradually developed from popular protests to an armed rebellion after months of military sieges.

The armed opposition consists of various groups that were formed during the course of the conflict, mostly the Free Syrian Army, which was the first to take up arms in 2011, and the Islamic Front formed in 2013. In 2013, Hezbollah entered the war in support of the Syrian army. In the east, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), a jihadist militant group originating from Iraq, made very rapid military gains in both Syria and Iraq, eventually conflicting with the other rebels. In July 2014, ISIL controlled a third of Syria’s territory and most of its oil and gas production, thus establishing itself as the major opposition force.

By July 2013, the Syrian government was in control of approximately 30–40% of the country’s territory and 60% of the Syrian population. A United Nations report in late 2012 described the conflict as being “overtly sectarian in nature”, between mostly Alawite government forces, militias and other Shia groups fighting largely against Sunni-dominated rebel groups, although both opposition and government forces have denied this. Due to foreign involvement this conflict has been called a proxy war.

Yeah, okay, now I remember lol. It was the sequel to Libya, where they paid people to go into the country and start riots, then they were like “ZOMG these people are crying out for a parliamentary democracy – let’s bomb their government in support of these terrorists so they can do a freedom!”

But then Assad, for whatever reason, held out better than Gaddaffi.

Of course, the real reason for these wars – as anyone with with an IQ over 90 is aware – is the Jew agenda to destroy any potential opposition to the Jews. And in that context, it makes the statements by Kerry more interesting, especially in light of the recent conflict with Netanyahu over bombing Iran.

I am not sure, but I’m reading this as a direct shot at Netanyahu. The American people don’t really think about Syria anymore, and both political parties support continuing to fund terrorists to do whatever Jews want them to do. And it isn’t like John Kerry cares about solving problems in a realistic fashion in order to prevent global catastrophe.

So yeah, I’m thinking this is a snub of Bibi, because these Democrats are seriously pissed. They’re saying “we’re not only going to not nuke Iran, we’re also going to give Assad back his country.”

The Jews are finally fighting each other, hardcore, I think. This is spectacular news.

I will also note that this newfound desire to stop the Syrian “civil war” (nonsense term, all the terrorists are foreigners) might be related to the fact that ISIS, who was originally funded by the US, has now gotten out of control and so it could be seen that there is a need to re-shift the balance again by allowing Assad to do some damage to them.

It’s funny to think about what the talks with Assad would be about.  What can they possibly say?  Would they just say “bro… I’m sorry about the misunderstanding.  We’re gonna stop funding these terrorists to murder all of your dudes.”?  Or would they try and negotiate some kind of partition of Syria and give pieces of it to ISIS?  Would they try to say Assad needs to make policy changes in line with Western liberalism, even though it is now 100% clear that virtually no Syrian nationals want policy changes and all these terrorists are foreigners being paid by the US?

Man, I sure hope if they do have talks they release the minutes.