Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 3, 2016
MILO the Jewish homosexual attempted to takeover the Alt-Right and use it for his own self-promotion purposes. He saw a rising popular movement, and said “he, there’s energy here I can leech onto.” His plan was to steal all of our memes, and our tone, hollow out all the politics and make it into a pro-gay version of neoconservatism.
His big coming-out for that was at his Houston speech on the Alt-Right back in September. He said that only 2-5% of the Alt-Right was racist, the other 95-98% were just saying racist things because they think it’s funny.
We knew that the truth was the opposite – there was at the time, due to confusion around the term, a few people claiming to be Alt-Right who were not racists, but that this was a tiny fraction of the movement, which is a genuine White Nationalist movement. What he was hoping to do was flood the movement with people using the label who didn’t share our racist and anti-semitic values, so our brand would no longer mean what we created it to mean. That is, he was trying to repeat exactly what was done to the Tea Party.
We fought back, and eventually he lost.
Our victory was clear at November’s NPI conference, when the term Alt-Right was once and for all solidified as a term that means “White Nationalism.”
So he’s the funny part, fam.
After all of that time trying to associate himself with the Alt-Right brand, now MILO is trying to disassociate himself from the Alt-Right brand, but the media is using it against him.
They are saying he is Alt-Right – because he spent all that time talking about it – but they’re also saying the now-revealed fact that “Alt-Right means white nationalism.”
Scott Greer has a piece up over at The Daily Caller on this situation that is sympathetic to MILO but otherwise accurate.
In late November, the Associated Press — the preeminent arbiter of journalistic style — issued a sternly-worded guide on using the term “alt-right.”
“Avoid using the term generically and without definition,” the AP’s guide advised, “because it is not well known and the term may exist primarily as a public-relations device to make its supporters’ actual beliefs less clear and more acceptable to a broader audience. In the past we have called such beliefs racist, neo-Nazi or white supremacist.”
The style arbiter then added, “whenever ‘alt-right’ is used in a story, be sure to include a definition: ‘an offshoot of conservatism mixing racism, white nationalism and populism,’ or, more simply, ‘a white nationalist movement.’”
To put the guide’s point “more simply,” the AP was arguing that the “alt-right” is essentially white nationalist, implying the term should only be applied to those who are, in fact, white nationalists. Journalists and media observers cheered on the AP’s guide at the time it was released for laying down the rules on using the term alt-right.
Yet, left-leaning journalists have seemingly ignored accurately applying the term to white nationalists. Instead, they now gleefully use the term without regard for the AP’s rules in an attempt to smear opponents on the Right as Nazis.
Last week presented a great example of this attitude in the controversy over Milo Yiannopoulos receiving a lucrative book deal. Outlets immediately labelled the Breitbart Tech editor and internet provocateur an “alt-right leader” and a white nationalist — even though he is neither of those things. (RELATED: Liberals Are Losing Their Minds Over The Milo Yiannopoulos Book Deal)
Think Progress ran an entire article calling Milo a “white supremacist” who peddles “white ethno-nationalism” without giving any evidence for the commentator meeting the criteria for that term, outside of out-of-context quotes from Ben Shapiro.
…
Milo has repeatedly said he is not a white nationalist and is not a part of the alt-right.
Actual white nationalists are very emphatic that Milo is not one of them as well. A lot of white nationalists absolutely hate him and have declared a “holy crusade” against him. They were also furious about his book deal.
There was even a recent reminder of this fact the same week the provocateur’s book was being pilloried as racist trash.
Outlets such as The Daily Beast, Buzzfeed and Reuters gave ample coverage a “civil war” erupting within the alt-right — and Milo was, of course, involved. A dispute arose over the inauguration party “Deploraball” that essentially pitted white nationalists versus non-white nationalist Trump supporters. A prominent guest, a popular Twitter user “Baked Alaska,” was disinvited from the event after tweeting out anti-Semitic messages and was replaced by Milo.
That set off concerns by white nationalists that they were being suppressed by the so-called “alt-lite” — a new formation that did not care for racialism. So journalists were well-aware of fresh declarations from white nationalists that Milo is not alt-right and is hated by self-proclaimed members of the alt-right.
Yet, they still went with calling Yiannopoulos an alt-right Nazi anyway because he once wrote an in-depth article on the movement that was light on criticism.
That’s because — contrary to the AP’s advice — the term alt-right is now applied as a weaponized term to paint opponents on the Right as Nazis. Critics of the term, such as the AP, thought writing the term without a definition allowed white nationalists to rebrand their extreme ideas as something new.
Now journalists get to use the term to rebrand standard conservative ideas as white nationalism.
This is, I believe, poetic justice.
Since the book deal was announced, I have seen no less than three (maybe even four) articles in the mainstream media with a correction at the bottom saying “MILO has corrected us that he isn’t actually in the Alt-Right.”
So it might partially be a way of attacking him, but it’s also just that the journalists themselves believe he is Alt-Right because he ran around talking about it for six months.
And now he has no vehicle.
Where he was claiming to be the “unofficial spokesman of the Alt-Right,” he is now just an effeminate homosexual Jew who hates Moslems and argues with blue-haired feminists.
As I’ve said, I think MILO is a semi-talented entertainer, and he has enough money backing him up that I’m sure he got someone decent to write the book for him (it’s come out that he doesn’t write any of his own articles, so he obviously didn’t write the book either).
I just don’t think he’s stable enough on a personal level to hold it together. Homosexuals do insane amounts of drugs, for instance, and he’s already gotten himself into a fake charity scam and a scandal involving a drug dealer being given a press pass at E3. One can only imagine what other stuff he’s got about to blow up.
That said, there apparently is a place for him in the mainstream neoconservative movement. But he’s not our problem anymore, whatever happens. He’s fleeing the term “Alt-Right,” he’s denouncing us as racist haters.
But I’ll tell you: when MILO was trying to steal our brand, he said “praise Kek.” This was blasphemous. The frog god is real and the frog god is merciless. And he will, someday soon, pay the price for trying to kike the Alt-Right.
