Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Zeiger
Daily Stormer
September 23, 2016
tfw you’re told you can’t win against a seizure granny
The normally very good Breitbart News has published a very low-energy piece about the upcoming debates. This is easily explained by the fact that for some reason, they allow skypes to write for their publication.
Okay… but why though?
Don’t the good folks at Breitbart know the saying?
I thought everyone knew this, smdh.
Ugh.
Anyway, let’s deconstruct this skype’s “arguments.”
Blue State Blues: Sorry, Trump Fans, Hillary Clinton Will Win First Debate
In the middle of August, it looked as though the first presidential debate, to be held on Monday at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, would be Donald Trump’s last chance to rescue his failing campaign with a dramatic surprise attack on Hillary Clinton.
Since then, however, Trump has mounted a comeback, and now leads in several swing states, with a path to 270 Electoral College votes and victory. Now, the first debate looks like Clinton’s last chance to stop the Trump surge.
And she is likely to do so.
Trump fans, brace yourselves: Hillary Clinton will win the first presidential debate. She will not do enough to put away the Republican nominee, but she will stop his momentum and force him to work that much harder to win.
Are you trying to skype us, Pollak?
Because it looks like you’re trying to skype us.
Are you really trying to peddle the notion that this woman:
is going to win against this man:
in a debate?
There are several reasons Clinton will win. Ironically, one of them is her fragile health.
Winning debates is all about beating expectations. And expectations for Trump are very low. Until recently, it seemed that all he would have to do to win is avoid major gaffes, and keep his cool.
But now, expectations for Clinton are even lower. Her collapse on September 11 has led to wild speculation that she might not be able to make it through 90 minutes. If she merely stays upright, she beats expectations.
(The Commission on Presidential Debates confirmed to Breitbart News Thursday that the candidates will be standing for the first debate. If they were seated, Clinton would have more energy but lose the strategic benefit of diminished expectations.)
No, you lying, rat-faced skype.
Debates aren’t about “beating expectations.” How did you even come up with that kind of skypish nonsense?
Debates are won by the party which looks the most dominant, the most confident, and to a lesser extent the party which has the best arguments.
The people will be drawn to the candidate that is the most charismatic.
If a rat joined the debate, would he win because he beat the expectation that a rat can’t talk?
Even without low expectations, Clinton should win the first debate, for two reasons.
The first is that she is the most seasoned debater in American political life today. Clinton does not have any real achievements to boast after eight years as First Lady, another eight years in the Senate, four years as Secretary of State, and two presidential campaigns. But years of debating — and years of evading questions — have helped her develop a polished, if uninspiring, public persona that conveys competence.
Debating isn’t the same as being under investigation for criminal behavior.
For one, unlike all the other people she’s dodged questions from, Trump isn’t going to pull punches and treat her with kid gloves. She’s not used to that. She gets upset when sympathetic interviewers ask her questions she doesn’t like.
How do you think she’ll react when Trump calls her out on her criminality right there, on the spot, and doesn’t buy her paper thin little excuses like the media does?
What does it matter if I committed perjury and large scale fraud?
Also, just because she can dodge accusations, doesn’t mean she’s not going to look really bad for being a skypey con-artist.
Clinton has two main debating tricks. One is to deploy distracting but serious-sounding details whenever she is faced with a question she does not want to answer. The other is to laugh at uncomfortable moments. Her laugh — a “cackle,” to her critics — is awkward but disarming, humanizing.
Those aren’t debating tactics, you retard, they’re just ways of throwing off dumb journalists. They wouldn’t work on someone who truly wants to destroy her, and isn’t just throwing softball questions at her.
She has weaknesses, too: she sometimes misreads her audience, as she did by using the term “slum lord” to attack then-Sen. Barack Obama for his Chicago cronies in 2008. But her tactics are usually effective.
Yeah.
She also called a quarter of America a “basket of deplorables” on TV. In a prepared speech.
Can you imagine the goofs she’ll make in a improvised debate?
The second reason that Clinton should win is that while Trump is a great persuader, and an entertaining speaker, he is a poor debater. For one thing, he is too quick to take offense at tough questions or jabs from opponents. The celebrated clash with Megyn Kelly in the first primary debate last year was entirely avoidable, and cost him female support. Trump also sometimes stumbles on policy questions beyond his core issues. He often forgets his own past statements and misstates his own views.
Yeah, Trump is a poor debater.
That’s probably why he completely massacred all the Republican opposition during the primaries. And unlike Hillary, those guys were actually known as good speakers.
Remember this, guys? Yeah. This happened.
Also, remember that the Republican primaries were Trump’s first real debating experiences. Now, he has that experience under his belt, and certainly got coaching for his rhetoric. His speeches are refined, his policies have been clarified.
Hillary will be dealing with a new and improved version of the man who humiliated all of his opponents during the earlier debates. And she couldn’t even deal with the reanimated corpse of a communist skype.
lol.
Friendly reminder: this also happened. More or less.
It is telling that while Trump successfully used the Republican primary debates to pick off his opponents one-by-one with a series of well-crafted “kill shots” — “low-energy” Jeb Bush, “little” Marco Rubio, “lyin’” Ted Cruz, Carly “look at that face” Fiorina — he won very few of the debates, online polls notwithstanding. If the moderator, NBC’s Lester Holt, decides to play “fact-checker” against Trump — something Trump is clearly concerned about — Trump is probably going to suffer most.
Bro, bro.
Are you saying that Trump lost the debates?
And still won the nomination?
By historically unprecedented margins?
Let me give you a newsflash here:
The point of a debate is to beat the other guys and win the election.
Trump will humiliate Hillary, and win the election.
But there is one larger reason that Clinton will win the first debate: the media will tell everyone she has won, regardless.
They are openly hostile to Trump, they know Clinton needs help, and they want to make up for Matt Lauer and Jimmy Fallon, who committed the grave sin of being fair to both.
With legions of faux fact-checkers, and battalions of biased pundits, the fix is in. Clinton will enjoy a bump in the polls– and Trump will have to claw his way back in the weeks and debates that follow.
Yes, the (((media))) will tell everyone she’s won.
Kind of like (((you’re))) telling everyone she will win, right?
What this Pollak character is doing here, is preparing his readership to accept the lies and deception crafted by the rest of the media after the debates, instead of rebelling against the obvious distortion of reality which they’re sure to engage in.
Very low energy of Breitbart to have published this. I guess they wanted to cause controversy in order to drive up their views? Who knows.
Forget about that.
The debate is coming.
And it’s going to be glorious.
It’s a great opportunity to do a last BBQ before the cold kicks in. Invite your friends, invite your fellow Stormer Book Club members, and have a blast!
Victory is ours.
