Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 18, 2015
In order to understand how feminism has destroyed our society, we must first understand what feminism is.
In modern right-wing discussions of the plague of feminism, there is a phrase which often comes up: “I’m not a feminist, but I think [insert whichever feminist belief].”
In the future, the right-wing should be able to avoid such annoying and entirely pointless lines of reasoning by having a clear conception of what feminism is.
Let’s first look at how Webster’s Dictionary defines it.
So, there are two definitions. The first is “the theory of political, economic and social equality of the sexes,” and the second is “organized activity on behalf of women’s rights and interests.”
Here we see where the confusion is. When people on the right-wing say “I am not a feminist, but…” they are saying that they do not support the political movement known as feminism. They do, however, support the idea that women should have some sort of social, economic and/or political equality.
I am obviously against the political movement known as feminism, but I am equally against the concept that women should possess a social status and “rights” equal to those of men.
If I were put on the spot, I would personally define feminism as such:
Feminism is the process of men anthropomophizing women as men.
Perhaps more simply, it is any conception of women that varies from the traditionally accepted conception of women as servants of men.
The basic lie of feminism is that women possess (or are capable of possessing) the same intellectual, emotional, psychological, social and moral traits as men.
Once you accept that a woman is capable of thinking and behaving in the same manner as a man, you have swallowed the lie, and you are completely doomed. Their very biology makes them incapable of possessing reason or morality unless they are led by a man to do so.
What happens when you forgo the necessity of controlling women is that they become out of control. What this leads to is something different than the initial concept of feminism, which is equality; it leads to an oppressive matriarchy, wherein women rule over men with brutal and pathological sadism.
If you give women an inch, they will take a mile. If you allow them to vote, they will eventually demand that they make every decision in society, that nothing be done without their approval. This is where Western countries are now.
#YesAllWomen
There is no such thing as a non-feminist woman in a feminist society. As long as women exist in such a society, they are subject to its norms, as they do not possess the ability to reason their way out of the paradigm itself.
The fact that a woman wants to be a stay at home mother does not mean she is not a feminist. Her feminism is determined by the way she perceives her social role. Any woman who believes she has a right to question the authority of men is a revolutionary feminist.
This is why it is sheer idiocy to talk about “finding a good girl.” No matter how good the girl you find may be, she still exists in a society which is constantly sending her messages that she responds to emotionally and which she does not have the logical or intellectual capacity to resist or even understand.
A woman’s brain is completely driven by emotional impulse, and these emotional impulses are easily manipulated by external influences. Mass media and education have literally become a science of manipulation. A man (assuming his testosterone levels are normal) can look at the media manipulation logically and say “something isn’t right here.” A woman, however, is incapable of resisting the indoctrination if it successfully targets her on the emotional level.
Even if a woman is not exposed to the mass media or the education system, these emotionally-charge ideas targeted at women are spread throughout the society like a virus via memetics.
This is not to say women are stupid. Far from it. They excel at emotional manipulation on a scale that men are incapable of even beginning to fathom. This is a survival strategy they were gifted with. Traditionally, though incapable of grasping the mechanisms of it, men at least understood that it existed and were thus able to be on guard against it. In the modern era, however, men have been conditioned to not even be aware of the fact that virtually everything a woman says or does is part of some form of long or short term emotional manipulation strategy.
Whether they themselves are conscious of this fact (or conscious at all for that matter) is open to debate, but is ultimately irrelevant. What should be understood is that they do not do this out of maliciousness, but simply because it is innate in their biology.
History of Women
All of what I am saying here is information that my grandparents’ generation would have taken as obvious facts. And not just my grandparents’ generation, but all generations going back to the dawn of mankind.
Throughout history, up until the first years of the twentieth century, women had the same status as they had in prehistory. They existed to serve specific duties in society, all of which were part of a role as supporters of men and caregivers to children.
The idea of allowing women to have a say in the way society was ruled would have been viewed as completely insane, given that all of their reason and morality is given to them by men, and reason and morality are the basis of any social order.
When women are allowed to have input on the way society functions, that input will be based on their emotions. And all of these emotions are controlled by the powers that be via mass media and education.
We have now reached the point where in the public sphere, emotional concepts do battle with other emotional concepts, and any attempt to insert basic logic into the public discourse is considered a type of Fascism.
The idea that women were oppressed all throughout history, stretching back to the dawn of man, as part of a massive misogynist conspiracy has been invented by feminists to explain away why men would have dealt with women in the exact same manner forever and then all of the sudden recognize their wrong-doing and change everything completely over a period of a few decades. This is obviously nonsensical, on the face of it, but such is the world we live in.
There is No Spectrum
There exists no spectrum of feminism or not feminism. Either you have a feminist society or you do not. If you have a feminist society, it will always progress in the same direction, which we are experiencing now. Women will continue to assert their “rights” until men are locked up in cages, or simply killed on arrival for having been born with a penis.
As such, there can be no “I’m not a feminist, but…”
The only options are to support the traditional role of women in society, in full, or to endorse a process that will eventually collapse society entirely.
So, statements such as:
“I’m not a feminist, but I think women should have equal say in society.”
“I’m not a feminist, but I think women should be able to vote.”
“I’m not a feminist, but I believe a woman has a right to speak back to a grown man in public.”
“I’m not a feminist, but I’m comfortable with a woman interrupting a conversation between men in order to insert her opinion.”
“I’m not a feminist, but there was a tens of thousands of years long conspiracy by men to oppress women and hurt their feelings.”
Are simply false statements. If you believe any of these things are okay, then you are a feminist.
I have been purposefully provocative in stating that in my view, women’s place in society now should be the same as their place in Medieval society. But their place in Medieval society was the same as their place in Ancient Rome or Greece, or all the way back in the hunter/gatherer period.
Maybe I am wrong. Maybe some aspects of feminism are good and should be incorporated into the ideal society. That is up to every individual to decide for themselves. Nonetheless, in order for a productive dialogue to take place, it needs to be understood and accepted that my position is the traditional position, and that any variation on this position is a non-traditional, progressive ideology.
For our purposes here, all forms of progressive female liberation ideology – that is, all conceptions of women which differ from the view traditionally held – will be considered “feminism.”
I believe that this is the only objective way to define feminism. If others want to create their own definitions of feminism, which include only the more extreme concepts of progressivist female liberation ideology, then this is their right, but I have no desire to engage in word games with these individuals.
So, with this understanding of what the word “feminism” means, we can now move forward in deconstructing it.
***
This is the first post in a series on the topic of feminism. Each post will eventually make up a chapter in a short book.
As I publish each chapter (probably one a week), I will post a copy of it on Amazon for sale as a .pdf for ten dollars. The article will be the same thing as is published here, and is being sold so that you can, if you wish, support me and my work by buying this .pdf through Amazon.
As you are aware, it is very difficult for me to receive funds, and because these posts contain no “racist” or “hate” content, they can be sold on Amazon. If you are feeling generous, you are allowed to buy more than one.
This is not directly supporting this website, it is merely supporting me as an individual. So the SPLC can cry a river, I am breaking no policy.
