Mattress Girl Alert: Columbia Wants Lawsuit Against Them Thrown Out

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 29, 2015

538

Mattress girl is back in the news.

The Jew rag Forward is covering the story of Columbia attempting to get the case dismissed against the bitch dismissed.

Columbia University on Friday asked a federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit by a recent graduate who said it allowed a student who accused him of rape to harass him by carrying a mattress around campus in protest, even though the school had cleared him of the allegation.

How on earth could you dismiss this case?

What Columbia did to this poor man was unprecedented in history.

In a filing in Manhattan federal court, Columbia said the discrimination lawsuit by the plaintiff, Paul Nungesser, suggested that the school had an obligation to silence his accuser, Emma Sulkowicz, from speaking publicly about sexual assault on college campuses, an issue of national concern.

Nungesser in April sued Columbia and visual arts professor Jon Kessler, who oversaw Sulkowicz’ senior thesis “Mattress Performance (Carry That Weight),” in which she drew national attention by carrying a mattress around the campus in Manhattan’s Morningside Heights. Columbia’s president, Lee Bollinger, was also named as a defendant.

This isn’t about free speech, this is about protecting and assissting someone in bizarre and hateful character assassination of a man who the school already admitted was innocent.

This Asian-Jew whore was sending him texts, after the “rape,” demanding anal sex.

The school knew this. Everyone knew this. But the school continued to allow her “performance art” to claim the poor man was a rapist.

The crazy Jewess literally carried this mattress to graduation, still talking about how she'd been raped.
The crazy Jewess literally carried this mattress to graduation, still talking about how she’d been raped.
Then the sick pervert made a porno about it!
Then the sick pervert made a porno about it!

And here’s a good question: if a student had carried around a lampshade as part of a performance art piece mocking the Jewish Holocaust, would Columbia have allowed it under free speech? Not that this would even be comparable, as that doesn’t attack an individual. But I’m thinking they probably wouldn’t have allowed it.

“Mattress Girl” is a perfect example of Jew psychology. Always the victim. Even when it is proven that your lies are lies, you keep lying because you yourself believe them, and this makes a certain percentage of others believe them as well, even though when they have been found to be objectively factually inaccurate.

Basically, Mattress Girl’s sex act was a little mini-holocaust.