Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 1, 2016
It was back in September. They just didn’t bother to tell you about it until now.
They were probably going to meet up with the San Bernardino Pakis and help attack the retard center. Or maybe they were just going to Disneyland.
When the U.S. Border Patrol nabbed two Pakistani men with ties to terrorism at the U.S.-Mexico border in September, it marked just the latest instance of illegal immigrants from so-called “special interest countries” using the southern border as a point of entry into the country.
Muhammad Azeem and Mukhtar Ahmad, both in their 20s and from Gujrat, were caught Sept. 20 by agents south of San Diego and just over the international border from Tijuana. When agents checked their identities through databases, they got hits on both of them: Mr. Ahmad popped up as an associate of a known or suspected terrorist, while Mr. Azeem’s information had been shared by a foreign government for intelligence purposes.
Both men had been processed two months earlier by immigration officials in Panama, suggesting they took advantage of smuggling networks or other routes increasingly used by Central American illegal immigrants to sneak into the U.S.
…
The FBI, whose agents were brought in to interview the two men, declined to talk about the case, saying it had “no information to provide.”
The Border Patrol turned the men over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), which said they have been in custody since September and are being held while they face immigration court proceedings.
This happens regularly.
A year before the two Pakistani men were caught, the Border Patrol apprehended four Kurdish men who said they were part of the Revolutionary People’s Liberation Front/Party, which is listed by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. Mr. Johnson, the Homeland Security secretary, said the four were actually members of the Kurdish Workers’ Party, which is also listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.
The Washington Times reported last year that the four men had paid $8,000 each to be smuggled from Istanbul through Paris to Mexico City, where they were kept by a smuggling network before being driven to the U.S. border. Their trip highlighted the existence of smuggling networks capable of getting terrorists from the Middle East to the U.S. border.
Earlier this winter two Syrian families sparked a furor when they showed up at the U.S.-Mexico border demanding asylum.
In a December 7, 2015 article about several cases of Syrians and other Arabs crossing the Southern border, I wrote:
Maybe a year ago you could have said “well, these Moslems are just trying to enter the US to get free everything forever and ever. However, now that Europe has full open borders and is offering all of these people a place in the new Caliphate, it does not make sense that they would be traveling across the planet to the US when they can just walk straight into Europe.
Probably, the US is considered a better destination, so those with the resources may be willing to try it. Potentially. But the risks are also very high, whereas entering Europe is completely without any risk whatsoever (unless your boat sinks, lol).
Overall, the likelihood that a Moslem crossing the Mexican border into America is actually an ISIS terrorist is very high.
And yet we leave the border wide-open. Because what difference does it make? We are legally importing ISIS terrorists, so why would we stop them coming in illegally?
