Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
The Judenpresse featured a number of headlines last week about Beyonce’s dad, Matthew Knowles, who whined that his daughter wouldn’t have become a multi-millionaire superstar if she’d had darker skin.
Like all good nationalists, I chuckled at the headlines, traveled to the National Historical Park in Atlanta to piss on Martin Luther King’s grave, then resumed life as normal thinking that this dumb “colorism” debate was over.
Ah, the naivety of youth.
Of course, it wasn’t over. A ridiculous-looking sheboon from Texas decided to take the debate a step further this week and whine about another Negro whom she thinks benefited from not looking like a total ape: Meghan [sic] Markle.
A journalist has claimed the British public feel more ‘comfortable’ with Meghan Markle joining the royal family because she is ‘not as dark as some African Americans’.
Journalist Keli Goff, 38, from Texas, pointed to data that shows Americans subconsciously consider black people with fairer skin to be ‘more attractive, less dangerous’ and ‘more comfortable to be around’ than those of darker skin tones.
She argued that this bias is the reason why many of the black ‘barrier breakers’ in American public life are either bi-racial or lighter-skinned.
Speaking on Good Morning Britain live from New York, Ms Goff explained that the same reasoning could be applied to Prince Harry’s American fiancee Meghan Markle, 36, who is bi-racial.
She said: ‘Even in your own country, the first person of colour in the royal family is going to be a part-black woman who does not outwardly appear black to all people.
‘I’m not saying everyone would have a problem if she looked darker but there is plenty of data to indicate that people are more comfortable because Meghan Markle does not appear to be outwardly as dark as some African Americans.’
Listen, Chocolate Face: of course the British public are going to be more comfortable with a princess who isn’t dark.
Even if you reject the fact that Caucasian features conform to the Golden Ratio and are proven to be the most attractive and coveted around the world, you still have to contend with the fact that Britons are naturally going to be more comfortable with people who look like them.
Major said she is a ‘proud African lady’ but that she lightens her skin because she ‘likes the way it looks’. She argued it was the same as a white woman choosing to use fake tan.
I am so sick of blacks making this argument. They do it all the time, and it makes me want to throw a canister of Zyklon B into the nearest synagogue.
There is a big difference between the fecal-brown skin color of blacks and the natural bronze color that whites become (or seek to emulate with fake tans) when exposed to sunshine. Everyone knows this deep down, including Markle, who has undergone a lot of surgery to remove her natural black features.
Not quite Michael Jackson-tier, but it’s definitely a noticeable change.
Ultimately, only one question remains for these blacks: What do they even want?
To force white people to somehow erase their in-built preference for their own kind?
To force British royalty to marry coal-black Negroes by law?
To force everyone else to become darker so that they can feel better about themselves?
Because if you really are that insecure about your skin color and the perceived disadvantages that it gives you in the West, blacks, there’s an entire continent down south that’ll take care of your issues.
I’m talking, of course, about Wakanda.
Go there, and don’t come back.
