Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
September 21, 2016
We see the “NO U” strategy used a lot by the Jews.
We’ve seen it a lot with the Clinton campaign. When Hillary was called out for having seizures and collapsing in public, the campaign was like “yeah but what about Trump’s health though?” When Hillary was caught using her foundation to accept bribes for political favors, the campaign was like “oh yeah but what about Trump’s foundation?”
The basic idea is that in the minds of the plebs, they can attach the opposition narrative’s buzzwords to the opposition itself, i.e. when a goy hears “potential health problems,” he doesn’t only think of Hillary but Trump as well. The actual facts obviously don’t matter, as the lowest level of the population which the strategy is designed to target lacks any basic ability to differentiate facts from complete lies.
It’s a very low-level retard strategy, but it works to a certain extent.
They do it to Russia as well. On some level, the entire Crimea drama is an example of the “NO U” strategy. America has spent the last 15 years invading countries seemingly at random, then they claim Russia is “aggressive” for “annexing” a small territory that belonged to them twenty years ago (currently occupied almost entirely by their people, and only after they voted).
There were many “NO U” instances during the Ukrainian conflict. After the coup government had been accused of slaughtering civilians in the East of the country, a Malaysian passenger jet was shot down and the Western media blamed Putin for it, personally. As if he had ordered it shot down. It was later revealed that the Maidan regime was almost certainly responsible for the shootdown.
After having bombed the Syrian army to help ISIS last week (during a ceasefire that the US agreed to), this week they’re accusing Russia of bombing an aid convoy.
RT:
Moscow has provided all the data it has on the attack on a humanitarian convoy in Aleppo, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said at a UN Security Council meeting. Lavrov also called for a full and impartial investigation into the incident.
“There was another unacceptable provocation on September 19 – the shelling of a humanitarian convoy near Aleppo,” Lavrov said.
He also noted that at the same time militants had advanced in the 1070 district of Aleppo.
“I am confident that such coincidences require serious analysis and an investigation.”
Russian subtlety lol.
On September 19, a humanitarian convoy consisting of 31 trucks was attacked while heading to Aleppo. According to the Red Cross, 20 civilians and one aid worker died as a result. Initial reports by the organization claimed the convoy had been targeted by an airstrike.
On Tuesday, the UN backtracked on its earlier claims that the convoy was hit by military planes.
“We are not in a position to determine whether these were in fact airstrikes. We are in a position to say that the convoy was attacked,” UN humanitarian spokesman Jens Laerke said.
Yeah, but the damage is done. We had already had a day of “PUTIN ORDERS UN AID CONVOY BOMBED BECAUSE HE IS A MEAN PERSON.” The people who believed that headline when they saw it aren’t the type to know that the UN is now backtracking on it, especially given that the mainstream media is only reporting this backtracking as a brief afterthought.
Of course, it will be immediately obvious to any investigator on the ground whether or not the convoy was attacked from the air or ground, and would probably be obvious to any expert viewing photographs of the scene, which were widely available online within hours of the attack. The UN backing off it’s initial claim that it was an airstrike pretty well confirms that this isn’t what it was.
Russia has pointed out that there are no craters and that the chassis of the trucks are intact, indicating pretty conclusively that the damage is from a ground attack.
We should also remember that while it is certainly possible to accidentally bomb things, the US is a lot more likely to do this than Russia. For one thing, the US has diversity hires running their military that Russia does not have, and for another thing, Russia has a lot more reason to be careful as they don’t have a massive media PR machine to cover their screw-ups.
In all likelihood, the US ordered some of their terrorists to attack the convoy for the purpose of creating this scene, just as they most probably ordered that jet shot down over the Ukraine to create that scene. We are not dealing with masterminds here.
