Now They’re Claiming Russia Hacked the New York Times

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
August 24, 2016

russian phishing hack

If Russia really is hacking all of these organizations – and there isn’t any proof that they are – aren’t the Jews just making themselves look inept by announcing it?

I mean, they are apparently implying (though it isn’t totally clear) that the DNC was “hacked” with a phishing email. These are not high-level spygames.

1337 russian haxor adIf your whole crap is getting exposed because you employ people at high security clearance levels (affirmative action?) who are stupid enough to “confirm your password” to a random email, going around bragging about it doesn’t seem logical.

I guess it’s just the only nasty thing you can claim Russia is doing with there being zero chance it can be disproved.

CNN:

Hackers thought to be working for Russian intelligence have carried out a series of cyber breaches targeting reporters at The New York Times and other US news organizations, according to US officials briefed on the matter.

The intrusions, detected in recent months, are under investigation by the FBI and other US security agencies.

Investigators so far believe that Russian intelligence is likely behind the attacks and that Russian hackers are targeting news organizations as part of a broader series of hacks that also have focused on Democratic Party organizations, the officials said.

The Times said email services for employees are outsourced to Google. CNN requested comment from Google but didn’t receive comment. The FBI declined to comment.

Times spokeswoman Eileen Murphy said the company had seen “no evidence” that any breaches had occurred of the Times’s internal systems. CNN’s report didn’t say that the Times internal systems were breached, but that reporters were targeted.

“We are constantly monitoring our systems with the latest available intelligence and tools. We have seen no evidence that any of our internal systems, including our systems in the Moscow bureau, have been breached or compromised,” Murphy said.

What evidence would you see?

How would you possibly know if professional hackers were secretly accessing your servers using employee credentials, unless they dropped documents?

This is how they get you. They think you’re uniformed enough to think that if someone has access to your systems, you can backtrace them somehow.

jessi-slaughters-dad

Well, you usually can’t actually do that.

Which brings up the question: is this story even real?

They never present any information about these alleged hacks, the evidence is always only presented by the hackers themselves. So, if this isn’t just anti-Russian propaganda, and “officials” are actually investigating a hacking, the most likely thing is that someone has been contacted by the hackers. Or, someone has been found to have responded to a phishing email.

The breaches targeting reporters and news organizations are part of an apparent surge in cyber attacks in the past year against entities beyond US government agencies.

US intelligence officials believe the picture emerging from the series of recent intrusions is that Russian spy agencies are using a wave of cyber attacks, including against think-tanks in Washington, to gather intelligence from a broad array of non-governmental organizations with windows into the US political system.

News organizations are considered top targets because they can yield valuable intelligence on reporter contacts in the government, as well as communications and unpublished works with sensitive information, US government officials believe.

The Times, in its report, disputed CNN’s report that the Times was bringing in private cybersecurity investigators to assist. Law enforcement officials briefed on the matter earlier told CNN that the Times had indicated it was bringing in private sector cybersecurity consultants to investigate.

Hacking attribution is stupid.