Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
January 24, 2016
Trump appeared on Fox News to talk about Glenn Beck and the NRO.
Well, it’s a failing magazine, you know that. It’s been failing badly, and they’re getting some publicity.
…
I can only say this — the National Review is a failing publication. It’s not going to be around long. And they’ll get some publicity. A lot of the writers think it’s going to help me more because people are tired of the negativity from these people. All they do is talk, but they don’t have solutions to anything, and so I mean, I’m fine with it. I’m not going to be reading it because I don’t read it very much anyway. But a lot of people don’t read it anymore.
Yeah.
People are very, very tired of these “people.”
An Oxford professor gave an interview with the Daily Caller echoing the same sentiment. Funny to watch him dance around the word “Jew.” You know he’s thinking it. Everyone with an IQ over 110 knows it.
Theodore Roosevelt Malloch, a professor at Oxford University and noted policy analyst, has harsh words for National Review and the 22 conservative figures who took part in the magazine’s “Against Trump” symposium.
In an interview with The Daily Caller, Malloch, both a proud “movement conservative” and supporter of Donald Trump, said the pundits who took aim at the Republican front-runner in NR’s latest issue have “the most to lose in a Trump victory.”
“The motivation simply is: life or death,” the scholar told TheDC. “They want their cushy jobs, going on talk shows, getting free lunches and cocktails, being important and the prestige it brings. They are in fact part of the ‘ruling political class’ and that will end [under a President Trump].”
Malloch — whose latest book, “Davos, Aspen and Yale: My Life Behind the Elite Curtain as a Global Sherpa,” covers his interactions with the events and figures who shaped conservatism — believes these “old, tired voices” don’t like Trump because the businessman is “a doer — not an idle thinker or theorist. He represents a kind of national conservatism that has a popular rather than an elitist stance.”
On the other hand, according to the Oxford professor, the folks involved in National Review’s symposium aren’t accomplishing anything.
“The myth of this crowd is that they accomplished things. Largely, they have not, unless you count earning fat pay checks and wider waist lines as accomplishments. I suppose they could all write books no one will read or just be bitter,” he stated.
They accomplished a bunch of wars. And opened the borders.
If you recognize that their entire purpose was to destroy White America by neutering it with a bunch of nonsensical claptrap about free markets and taxes then they are possibly one of the most successful political movements in history.
In Malloch’s opinion, the publication founded by William F. Buckley no longer articulates a relevant political ideology.
“NR has, unfortunately, as has The Weekly Standard, become the GOE [grand old establishment], the establishment rag and no longer represents either real conservatism or the evolving GOP. It is that insignificant,” he told TheDC. “National Review is not what it used to be! Its readership has dwindled and its editor sure ain’t no Bill Buckley, in any way, shape or form.”
“In some ways they are both removed from the travail and demands of everyday life, from economic anxiety experienced by the middle class and do not live in the flyover zone. They are captives of Washington, D.C., a one factory town, and its insidious culture and have become complete insiders, complicit in the malaise of current governing. They ‘go along to get along.’ They are, in fact, part of the problem and they all fear Trump will excise them — and he will,” he continued.
The day is coming fast when professors at Oxford can give interviews and say “The National Review is run by terrorist kikes trying to abolish the White race.”
However, Malloch believes the “Against Trump” issue will do little damage to the flamboyant billionaire’s bid for the White House and may in fact help him.
“By mounting this foolish and vitriolic effort, they have probably handed Trump the fastest route to the presidency and will increase his poll standings by more than 10 percent,” he predicts. “The NR effect is negligible in all truth.”
These predictions are already coming true.
NRO was immediately dropped as a sponsor of the next GOP debate, the RNC saying it was because they have a subversive agenda. Untold numbers of people canceled their subscriptions to the magazine, resulting in the publisher issuing an apology.
They were severely trolled by Nazis.
Fox News and Breitbart have responded with anger to the attack.
Chris Matthews has even come out and blasted NRO editor Eliana Johnson (@elianayjohnson – tollable), saying that the (((NRO))) is against Trump because he doesn’t support their endless wars for Israel.
The Jews are attempting to rally around NRO, but it just isn’t having any effect. Everyone hates them. They have exposed themselves.
The situation is this:
Trump is like “hey America, here’s a gigantic juicy steak with all the fixins! Have a taste!”
And the NRO is like “no, don’t eat that steak, goyim! That’s not true food! Eat this smashed up, rotting rat corpse instead! Do it because of principles!”
They have nothing at all. They can’t even explain their own positions. The anti-Trump manifesto is just rambling nonsense.
I honestly don’t know what message they even think they are communicating.
Here are a few reasons the manifesto gives for not supporting Trump:
1.) Trump is for “big government.”
I don’t think anyone really knows what that means. It is abstract. Generally, it is used to refer to liberals who push policies that intrude into people’s lives, but Trump is supporting freedom like no one ever has before.
So that complaint doesn’t even register as making sense.
(Please note: these are the same Jews who shouted-down Ron Paul for wanting to close-down most government offices.)
2.) Trump wants to tax rich people.
Man, we’re drowning here, while these people drink our blood.
No one wants to sacrifice their lives for billionaires anymore. It’s a dead mode of thinking.
3.) Trump is against free trade.
Who is going to stand behind the abstract notion of “free trade,” when we see that what it means is “your job goes to China”?
These abstractions stop being effective propaganda once their real life consequences are understood.
4.) Trump is a secret liberal.
The guy you all called a Hitler Nazi for wanting to ban all Moslems is a secret liberal?
lolwut?
5.) Trump would refuse to start a World War with Russia.
The National Review doesn’t ever attempt to explain why you would want to have a World War with Russia, they seem to just believe that the idea of such a war is self-evidently good. There is no need to even explain it.
Needless to say, Americans are pretty fed-up with wars at this point.
The rest of the manifesto is mostly name-calling. Some of the top Jews who contributed to the manifesto, including William Kristol, didn’t even bother to state reasons for opposing Trump, instead just calling him names.
It’s difficult to grasp what these people were even thinking when they put this out. What did they think the reaction would be?
“Oh yeah, I was supporting Trump, but all those Jews who started the Iraq war and that weird fat guy who cries on television told me I shouldn’t support him, so I’ve decided I’ll vote Jeb”?
There doesn’t appear to have been even a potential positive outcome to this manifesto.
These Jews are officially unhinged – they are pulling their own hair out, terrified by the brutal reality that they cannot stump the Trump.
The cat is bagless.
Donald Trump is already the President of America.
