Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Gottfried Sturmherr
Daily Stormer
January 2, 2019
Reader discretion is advised! The levels of chutzpah and Talmudry reviewed in the following article are unprecedented!
The Jews at the Jew York Times continue their course to smear and lie, without engaging in an argument. Instead they openly and brazenly feast upon censorship and the Jewish terror campaign that has a firm grip on science and free though.
It has been more than a decade since James D. Watson, a founder of modern genetics, landed in a kind of professional exile by suggesting that black people are intrinsically less intelligent than whites.
It is not just a “kind of” exile if you are forced to resign and shunned, subsequently removed from polite society and ousted from a field of research you yourself invented. Which is what happened to Watson. This is only one step short of locking the guy up, the chilling effect this has on freedom of expression is the same.
In 2007, Dr. Watson, who shared a 1962 Nobel Prize for describing the double-helix structure of DNA, told a British journalist that he was “inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all the testing says, not really.”
Moreover, he added, although he wished everyone were equal, “people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.”
This is not just true for people who employ blacks, this is true for anyone who comes in contact with blacks over a certain period of time. They are dangerous animals who should have never been brought to live with Whites to begin with.
Dr. Watson’s comments reverberated around the world, and he was forced to retire from his job as chancellor of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island, although he retains an office there.
He apologized publicly and “unreservedly,’’ and in later interviews he sometimes suggested that he had been playing the provocateur — his trademark role — or had not understood that his comments would be made public.
Ever since, Dr. Watson, 90, has been largely absent from the public eye. His speaking invitations evaporated. In 2014, he became the first living Nobelist to sell his medal, citing a depleted income from having been designated a “nonperson.’’
He was forced to sell his Nobel prize to keep feeding himself after he has been one of the most respected scientists in the world, for over 50 years. Why? Because he publicly stated the obvious and well proven fact that niggers are stupid.
The New York Times makes sure to reinforce that, if you say what Watson says, Mr. Scientist, you will lose your career, which is why most Biologists keep quiet about this.
That is the crux of the article. Make sure everybody knows that if you state the obvious about blacks and thus undermine the Jewish agenda of equality and diversity, they will take everything away from you.
But his remarks have lingered. They have been invoked to support white supremacist views, and scientists routinely excoriate Dr. Watson when his name surfaces on social media.
Watson was destroyed by the media for an offhand – and factual – comment on race and IQ.
Watson’s cancer research was crippled. As a cancer survivor, that pisses me off no end.
Screw the mafia media.
Speak the truth.
— Stefan Molyneux (@StefanMolyneux) November 25, 2018
Well, that's not true:
1. James Watson, a major pioneer of DNA science has stated that racial DNA is linked to IQ.
2. Forensic anthropologist George W. Gill: "The idea that race is ‘only skin deep’ is simply not true.”
3. Richard Dawkins said race has "taxonomic significance"— Neo (@newoccident) September 22, 2018
Oh, and of course, those that go along with the Jewish approved science that blacks are just the same are legitimate in “excoriating” Watson. You be the judge.
sick of hearing "but watson is a great scientist"- he is using science to promote racism and his scientific stature to get an audience
— Michael Eisen (@mbeisen) December 3, 2014
(((Michael Eisen))), everyone.
He had an audience until it was taken away from him for his professional opinion. You could get the impression that Jews are really bad at the whole cause and effect thing until you figure out that they know exactly what they are saying and are just lying to you.
Eric Lander, the director of the Broad Institute of M.I.T. and Harvard, elicited an outcry last spring with a toast he made to Dr. Watson’s involvement in the early days of the Human Genome Project. Dr. Lander quickly apologized.
It does not stop with Watson. Everyone who is speaking his name without vicious disgust is automatically guilty of the same and you better cuck quick and cuck hard or off to forced-retirement you go.
“I reject his views as despicable,” Dr. Lander wrote to Broad scientists. “They have no place in science, which must welcome everyone. I was wrong to toast, and I’m sorry.’’
“I’m sorry. I’m sorry I accidentally toasted to someone who has been unpersoned. I love niggers, I love them so much, here, take all my money and my wife and my daughter, but please, please don’t call me racist.”
Still, Dr. Lander, even though you cucked this hard, the New York Times mentioned you almost a year later. And they didn’t praise you for cucking, they use you as their little bitch to show how you better keep your mouth shut about Watson, or else.
And yet, offered the chance recently to recast a tarnished legacy, Dr. Watson has chosen to reaffirm it, this time on camera. In a new documentary, “American Masters: Decoding Watson,’’ to be broadcast on P.B.S. on Wednesday night, he is asked whether his views about the relationship between race and intelligence have changed.
“No,’’ Dr. Watson said. “Not at all. I would like for them to have changed, that there be new knowledge that says that your nurture is much more important than nature. But I haven’t seen any knowledge. And there’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites on I.Q. tests. I would say the difference is, it’s genetic.’’
He has nothing to lose anymore and nothing to gain from cucking either. It’s commendable how Dr. Watson is staying firm in his professional, scientific and fact based opinion and is not intimidated by weaselly kikes trying to destroy his legacy.
He has nothing left except his convictions and his scientific achievements. Which is why the media has to do a piece on him. They can’t resist, they can’t help themselves.
They have to tarnish what this man has done for the world, because he thinks that blacks have a lower IQ, ON AVERAGE, than Whites.
Dr. Watson adds that he takes no pleasure in “the difference between blacks and whites’’ and wishes it didn’t exist. “It’s awful, just like it’s awful for schizophrenics,’’ he says. (His son Rufus was diagnosed in his teens with schizophrenia.) Dr. Watson continues: “If the difference exists, we have to ask ourselves, how can we try and make it better?”
Dr. Watson’s remarks may well ignite another firestorm of criticism. At the very least, they will pose a challenge for historians when they take the measure of the man: How should such fundamentally unsound views be weighed against his extraordinary scientific contributions?
Another ‘firestorm’ ya think? See, they are already invoking that historians will have to be very careful as to how they portray Watson, or else. They are basically admitting that they are going to fake history, a fact well known among people who have studied history.
In response to questions from The Times, Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, said that most experts on intelligence “consider any black-white differences in I.Q. testing to arise primarily from environmental, not genetic, differences.”
Most experts keep their mouths shut because they have no intention to going through what Dr. Watson went through. They want to do science and research and not be ousted from their work because reality does not conform with what Jews say reality is.
So, this is not at all surprising. And then you have those scientists, like Dr. Collins, who lie to your face in order to climb the ladder. Collecting good goy points with the Jews to further their own careers.
Their opinions can be disregarded as biased and bought.
Dr. Collins said he was unaware of any credible research on which Dr. Watson’s “profoundly unfortunate’’ statement would be based.
It’s called “The Bell Curve,” Dr. Collins. A book that is not mentioned once in this entire article, mind you.
The Bell Curve is not the only source that says niggers are stupid, there is plenty of evidence and scientific work done on the subject.
“It is disappointing that someone who made such groundbreaking contributions to science,’’ Dr. Collins added, “is perpetuating such scientifically unsupported and hurtful beliefs.’’
This is what rankles the Jews the most: his contributions. If he wasn’t the accomplished White man he is, they wouldn’t write mile long essays about his opinions. They would just bury and forget about him. Make him ‘unpersoned.’
Then there’s this:
“It’s not an old story of an old guy with old views,’’ said Andrea Morris, the director of career development at Rockefeller University, who served as a scientific consultant for the film. Dr. Morris said that, as an African-American scientist, “I would like to think that he has the minority view on who can do science and what a scientist should look like. But to me, it feels very current.’’
And this right here proves Dr. Watson’s point and far beyond. This ape-creature has a Ph.D and refers to herself as a “scientist,” yet does not understand the difference between “on average” and “who can and can’t do science.”
