OH YES: Spic Journalist Who Rioted at Inauguration Facing 75 YEARS in PRISON! YES YES YES!

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 10, 2017

Aaron Cantu: He can share a cell with James Comey. They both committed their crimes in DC, so it’s likely they’ll be in the same prison. We’ll put cameras in the cell and make it into a reality TV show called “Stumped.”

The biggest enemy of this country is not neocon warmongers, it’s not bankers, it’s not feminists, it’s not SJWs, it’s not black criminals, it’s not faggots.

It’s not even “Jews, generally.”

It is very specifically the Jewish media.

Because without the media control, everything else falls apart.

The media is the number one enemy of the people.

More and more and more people are waking up to this, because of how much of their hand they’ve been forced to show by Donald Trump. I mean, Comey confirming that the NYT literally just makes things up – or at least prints false statements from government officials that they have significant reason to believe are untrue – is a massive, massive blow.

Now, one of the bastards is going to prison.

Finally.

A journalist is going to prison.

Yes, it is only one guy, and yes, he is going for rioting and not for a conspiracy to undermine the American nation, and no, regrettably, he doesn’t appear to be Jewish – but still:

A journalist is going to prison.

RT:

A journalist has been indicted by a grand jury on felony charges that he participated in a riot while covering the protests on Inauguration day in Washington, DC. He faces 75 years in prison if convicted.

Aaron Cantu, a staff writer at the Santa Fe Reporter, was one of around 230 people arrested during protests on January 20, including six other journalists who have all had their charges dropped by February, according to the Reporters Committee for Freedom.

Cantu accepted an October 15, 2018 trial date and entered a plea of not guilty, according to the Monitor. Cantu will have a motion hearing on April 6, 2018 and a status hearing October 27, 2017.

According to the indictment obtained by the Monitor, “Cantu, and other individuals participating in the Black Bloc, brought face masks, gas masks, and goggles to eliminate or mitigate the effectiveness of crowd control measures that might be used by law enforcement.

However, the Santa Fe Reporter says that video footage from the conservative media group The Rebel shows Cantu was “off to the side of the protests with other journalists, washing what appears to be pepper spray from his eyes.”

Filthy “conservative” kike Ezra Levant of Rebel Media Jews us yet again.

No one cares if he actually rioted or not.

We want a journalist burned.

For being a journalist.

If there was footage showing something that would help a journalist’s legal case, it should have been destroyed.

The indictment does not name Cantu as the cause of any of the destruction, only that he was “present while the damage happened,” according to the Santa Fe Reporter.

Olivia Cappello of Dead City Legal Posse, a logistics and financial support group for the defendants, told RT that the courts were overrun with around 60 defendants during Cantu’s arraignment on Friday. Cappello said they were divided into four groups for status hearings that also included the setting of trial dates.

Superior Court Judge Lynn Leibovitz set up trial dates with eight defendants each day, saying, “Clearly we can’t try 215 people at one time,” according to the Monitor.

The defendants face an “unprecedented prosecution,” Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, a human rights attorney and co-founder of Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, told RT in an interview set to air Monday.

“We have not witnessed mass charges of this nature, charges that are completely inappropriate,” Verheyden-Hilliard said.

“We have not witnessed political violence of this nature, political violence is completely inappropriate.”

In the Trump era, leftists have a new entitlement: “the right to riot.”

Defendants are under pressure to take plea deals for lesser charges and sentences, but Verheyden-Hilliard advises against giving into what she feels is a ploy “to crush a growing social justice movement.”

“The basis by which the government is prosecuting hundreds of people who protested Donald Trump’s inauguration is not that they themselves engaged in illegal activity,” Verheyden-Hilliard added. “It’s really that they engaged in lawful journalistic activities, lawful free speech activities.

Who were the people rioting then?

Different people, who weren’t arrested?

Why were there 230 journalists caught in the middle of a riot, and how did only the journalists get arrested and not the rioters?

This is not a good line of defense. If that was the line of defense a lawyer told me to use, I would probably take the plea deal.

Hopefully, the journalist does not, and goes to prison for 75 years.

According to Buzzfeed, more than 100 of those arrested have committed to a “Points of Unity” statement, pledging to reject any plea deals that “cooperate with prosecutors at the expense of other codefendants.”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!1111

Awesome.

Last week, a grand jury indicted Cantu on eight felony charges, including inciting a riot, rioting, conspiracy to riot and five counts of destruction of property, according to the Santa Fe Reporter.

“Aaron is an experienced journalist who disclosed this pending case during the hiring process,” Julie Ann Grimm, editor and publisher of SFR, said. “We stand behind him and look forward to his continued good work in his new home in Santa Fe.”

In February, the Reporters Committee for Freedom sent a letter to acting US Attorney Channing Phillips, who is overseeing the case, in defense of Cantu.

“Journalists are not above the law and have no right to incite a riot or engage in acts of assault or vandalism,” Bruce Brown, the executive director of the organization, said. “But being near a newsworthy event is no crime for anyone, reporters included. Journalists routinely run toward the center of any action, so they can better serve the public by reporting an event they personally witnessed, rather than something recounted by bystanders.”

Something I want to explain here:

What is now being widely referred to as “journalism” is not free speech.

Modern American journalists are part of an open and clear conspiracy to lie to people for the express purpose of destroying the country.

All of them deserve to be rounded up and interned in a concentration camp.

It can from that point be determined which, if any, were not involved in this conspiracy.

People who claim that modern “journalism” has something to do with the First Amendment are simply liars, or stupid.

Lying to people for financial gain is not protected by the First Amendment. It’s fraud.

And conspiring to lie to an entire nation for the express purpose of destroying that nation goes way beyond simple financial fraud. It is sedition.

So, please understand, I am 100% in support of free speech and especially free political speech.

But right now, you have a gigantic conspiracy that all major media is cooperating in to create a false reality.

This does not relate to the First Amendment, in any way.

With the conspiracy at the level it is at, we simply need to round-up all journalists and detain them indefinitely, under the assumption that they are willingly involved in this conspiracy. Sure, a lot of them are likely pushing a false reality that they themselves believe in, however even if they believe in the false reality, they are pushing it for the knowing purpose of destroying the nation.

The legality of “unknowing but purposeful involvement in conspiracy to commit fraud with intent of sedition” can be determined later.

After we have all of these people in camps.