Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 15, 2017

tfw a TV interview is a vicious interrogation and still has to be censored before it can be shown to the stupid goyim.

I can tell you with 100% certainty that if the SPLC didn’t inspire a political assassination attempt yesterday, this would be the biggest story of the week.

I mean, talk about proving our points for us.

Editing mention of Israel out of an interview?

This is Jewish-controlled media becoming a parody of itself!

Page Six:

Oliver Stone started a “cringe-worthy” fight about Israel with Stephen Colbert on the latter’s CBS show that never made it on-air.

A Page Six source who was in the audience for the taping of the network’s “The Late Show With Stephen Colbert” on Monday told us that the political spat was “painful to watch.”

The audience member explained that as Colbert pressed Oscar winner Stone — who was promoting his new Vladimir Putin Showtime series, “The Putin Interviews” — on his apparent sympathy for the Russian president in spite of claims about Russian interference in the US election, Stone, at a disadvantage, tried to shift the talk to Israel.

The source said they “watched from behind [their] hands” as Stone said words to the effect of: “Israel had far more involvement in the US election than Russia.”

HOW IS THIS CONTROVERSIAL????

PLEASE READ OUR ENTIRE DETAILED REPORT ON ISRAELI ELECTION MEDDLING ON BEHALF OF HILLARY CLINTON.

THERE IS NO ONE WHO CAN ARGUE WITH THESE FACTS – THAT IS WHY IT GETS EDITED OUT OF TV SHOWS!

The “Platoon” director further challenged Colbert by saying, “Why don’t you ask me about that?” — but we’re told that the host shot back, “I’ll ask you about that when you make a documentary about Israel!”

(The source described Stone’s Israeli argument as “a classic anti-Semitic canard.”)

Meanwhile, the parts of the discussion that did make it to air Monday night were called “fiery,” “tense” and “bizarre” by critics.

The tête-á-tête seemed to go off the rails when the audience groaned with incredulity as Stone swooned about Putin, “He’s been through a lot. He’s been insulted and abused . . . abused in the press, in the media.”

They cheered when Colbert said, “Anything about him negative that you found? Anything? Anything?” Colbert also asked, “What do you say to the people who will say this is a fawning interview of a brutal dictator?”

Yeah.

Buzzwords supersede facts on the kike controlled media, with their vicious Danny Boys who are ready to give their lives for their hook-nosed masters.

This is absolutely outrageous.

The interview was hostile from the beginning, as Stevie Boy had heard warning that Stone had a plan to steal his lucky charms.

All hail Oliver Stone – I don’t care if he is half Jew, this man is a Bobby Fischer-tier half-Jew standing up for the white race against the evil international parasite.

He got away with saying the Holocaust needed more research because of his genetic link to the tribe. Even though what he said was 6,000,000 times worse than what Mel said – and he said it sober. But Mel is 100% pure Bavarian phenotype Aryan master race.

But what he just did here – openly calling out the Israeli election meddlers on TV to the point where the Jews felt the need to edit it out – this will end his career. His half-blooded state can’t protect him after that.

This is absolutely fantastic.

If they could just berate him for it – and Stevie Boy’s responses were so cutting that the audience mocked Stone for his “anti-Semitic canards,” then why did it need to be removed from the show?

Meanwhile, on network television…

How often does this happen, that they cut someone politically incorrect out of an interview for the Late Show?

I have never heard of it happening before. It probably has happened before, but I’m not aware of it.

God bless you, Mr. Stone.

And I can promise you, after the revolution, if you’re still with us, we’re going to make you assistant director of Hollywood affairs – right beneath Mel himself.

Here’s the part of the interview that made it on air.

Washington Free Beacon:

The portion that aired was unusually tense for a “Late Show” interview, as Colbert pressed Stone over the “fawning” tone of his Putin interviews. They were conducted over the course of 20 hours in a two-year span, and the Washington Post described the previews: “If the glimpse so far is any indication, the Oscar winner lobbed a lot of softballs at the Russian leader and took the dictator’s words at face value.”

Stone said one has to be “polite” in defense of a clip in which he simply accepted Putin’s claim that he did not interfere in the 2016 U.S election, which 17 U.S. intelligence agencies said did happen.

“That doesn’t seem like an interview,” Colbert said. “That seems like an opportunity for him to merely propagandize.”

Stone, who has expressed open affection for far-left strongmen like Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro, defended Putin as a “strong nationalist” who is “devoted to his country.”

“I’m amazed at his calmness, his courtesy,” Stone said. “He never really said anything bad about anybody. He’s been through a lot. He’s been insulted and abused.”

Some in the crowd mockingly laughed and booed when Stone suggested the autocratic Putin had been “abused,” to which he defensively said Putin was abused in the press. Colbert asked whether Stone had anything negative to say about Putin, joking that the Russians perhaps kidnapped his dog.

Stone became visibly frustrated with the crowd and Colbert over their stance, at one point snapping he did not know why the audience laughed at his description of Putin as a “social conservative.”

He also claimed support for freedom of speech, to which Colbert shot back that Putin seemed an unusual person to defend given accusations he has faced of killing journalists.

Putin kidnapping dogs sounds like something the kike media and their Danny Boys would say seriously – not as a joke. This whole “kills journalists” is on par with dog kidnapping. Although journalists obviously should be killed, and not doing that could in itself be considered the worst crime of Putin or any other leader.

That is to say “Putin refuses to kill journalists” would be a better line of attack than falsely claiming that he does without ever offering any evidence. You can quite easily prove that he doesn’t kill journalists, and that’s something that should make people a lot angrier.

I haven’t gotten a chance to watch the show yet, but I will by this weekend and write up a report.

It looks very, very good, and I’ve read it even goes over the CIA funding the Chechen monkey to blow-up Russian train stations – something which hasn’t been talked about really at all.

For those of you who haven’t gotten this through your heads yet:

RUSSIA = GOOD

WEST = BAD

Obviously, it is more complicated than that, as everything in life is more complicated than that, but in the reduced form, that is the ultimate truth of these matters.

That is why the entire agenda against Trump is designed to stop him from mending relations with Russia.

Here’s part one and two.

Don’t know if they’ll call copyright or not, but here they are now.