Daily Stormer The Most Censored Publication in History
Adrian Sol
Daily Stormer
December 11, 2017
Is it a paradox to endorse both the groping of women and the firing of Jews who do it?
The mainstream left has been running with the #MeToo narrative with complete abandon, seemingly without understanding what they were getting themselves into.
But now that we’re more than a month into it, some of these people are starting to realize just how self-destructive this movement is going to be for their own political goals.
Well, I’ve got some bad news for you: it’s impossible to stop this.
Yes, everyone thought of Lauren Southern when they first saw the headline.
That was fast. In this #MeToo moment, feminism has been coopted by both people who don’t understand it and by people who oppose it. Worse: it’s now being used against people who are feminists and allies.
Obviously.
You think macho chads are the kind of people who’d get ratted out for a little groping? Women are only offended when beta cucks touch them. And who says beta cuck, says male feminist “ally.”
Outside of Jews, these are the types who are going to get the axe under the MeToo regime.
It’s already been announced loud and clear that chads beating up women will suffer no professional consequences for their actions.
The most recent example comes from Mike Cernovich, the alt-right conspiracy theorist who led the way on the Pizzagate hoax that claimed senior Democrats were involved in a child abuse ring in the basement of a Washington DC restaurant. That whole ruckus should’ve given MSNBC pause when he went after one of their regulars.
Cernovich recently orchestrated a campaign to pressure MSNBC to fire contributor Sam Seder over a joke he made in a 2009 tweet. The network did fire him – only to then rehire him after a backlash against their decision.
I don’t like Thernovitch, but you gotta hand it to him: that was funny.
If you have ever been exposed to jokes before, you’d know the tweet was sarcastic. It mocked people whose defense of Roman Polanski from child rape accusations rested on the fact that he was a ‘great artist’. It was an anti-rapist rape joke, like the kind that Amy Poehler, Tina Fey, Amy Schumer and even Jay Leno later told about Bill Cosby.
Rape joke, or anti-rape joke? Who can tell the difference? Better stay safe and just fire everyone.
We’re now at the point where people are being canned for jokes, by people who don’t get the jokes, don’t get feminism, don’t get that maybe there should be some proportion in this thing, and don’t get that right-wing men with a public record of misogyny might not be your best guides through all this.
Even if Seder’s joke was bad and made in the wrong spirit (which, just to be clear, it wasn’t), if we’re going to fire everyone who has made a non-feminist remark we’re pretty much going to clear all the offices everywhere of almost every man and quite a few women.
KEK!
Wasn’t that always the point of feminism? It certainly is in the current year.
Maybe this bitch is starting to realize that now most of these “offices” are occupied by commie bugmen, Jews and SJW’s, and that maybe this isn’t exactly the smartest idea anymore.
Consider the experience of writer Ijeoma Oluo, who last week said that USA Today asked her to write a piece arguing a feminist position against due process.
She says an editor there told her, “[…] They want a piece that says that you don’t believe in due process and that if a few innocent men lose their jobs it’s worth it to protect women. Is that something you can do?”
They were asking her to say feminists are happy to harm individual men for the good of the cause, and not interested in distinguishing innocence from guilt. She refused. That’s not who she is and not who feminists are.
This is nuts, but not surprising in any way. Well, the surprising part is that she refused – I guess even a feminist journalist must realize how bad this would look, to come right out with this “ABOLISH JUSTICE SO WE CAN FINALLY HAVE EQUALITY” ideology.
If we suspended all due process, it would be so easy to get rid of these oppressors…
John Conyers is accused by multiple women, some of whom were his employees, of sexual harassment. He rightly resigned. Still, I’m curious why Conyers’s accusations surfaced when they did and if they’re supposed to somehow neutralize Moore’s.
Basically, this whole article is “we can’t let #MeTooism be a tool of the right – we have to make it a tool of the left instead!”
It’s so transparent that even the Guardian’s readers see right through it.
The fact is that no one can “harness” this for their political agenda. It’s simply naturally destructive to the left, since it exposes their own agents to the same kind of scrutiny that the right has always been under.
And that’s not something they can withstand.
