Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
November 13, 2015
Viktor is at it again, spinning his wild conspiracy theories.
The migrant invasion to Europe from the Middle East and Africa may be part of a left-wing plot to pack the continent with sympathetic voters, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has told Swiss magazine die Weltwoche. He also said that the British make better allies because they apply more “common sense” but argued that whether or not we are a Christian nation and continent is rarely discussed by Prime Minister David Cameron and the broader political right in Britain.
None of that is really exactly accurate. I think that it is plausible that Libya was taken out for the purpose of opening up a direct route from Africa to Europe, and America is probably working directly with Turkey to flood the EU, but it isn’t about left-wing voters. When these people vote they are going to vote for Islam, not some left-wing secular socialism.
Also don’t really no why anyone would say Britain is better. Maybe in comparison to Germany they are more reasonable, but barely. I suppose on the whole they have less of a desire to force their will on other countries.
Orban, who was the first European leader to erect a strong and almost impenetrable border fence, has previously hit out at pro migrant invasion individuals and ideologues including Hungarian-American businessman George Soros, whose Open Society Foundations provide funding to almost every pro-migration activist and talking head in the English-speaking world.
Hey Breitbart, is Soros Jew? I can’t remember.
Now, Mr. Orban has ramped up his rhetoric, insisting that there is a “master plan” by left-wing activists on both sides of the Atlantic, specifically pointing to “radical American Democrats” for their involvement, and the fact that Western, Judeo-Christian culture is being ignored in the whole debate.
“Nobody has raised the question whether this is about our very existence, our cultural identity, our way of life.
“I do not know with certainty what is really happening, and I don’t want to accuse anyone, but the suspicion is that all this is no accident. I’m not brave enough to speak in public with confidence about it. But one can not help to imagine that behind it a kind of master plan.
“Not brave enough… master plan.”
Yeah.
He was asked who was behind the “master plan”, to which he replied: “My personal impression is that the elite of Europe, when it comes to questions of a spiritual nature, debate only shallow and secondary topics.
“That’s the most difficult question. For this purpose, we need to identify some left wing political writing that has been published in recent years and addressed the future of the European Union and a potential European superstate.
“I read these articles and essays, and it occurs to me that some authors called for a diminishing role of the nation state… The European Left and radical American Democrats have concocted a theory for this new world.
He said the elite, or ruling classes are only concerned with “[c]ute things like human rights, progress, peace, openness, tolerance… We are not talking about freedom, we are not talking about Christianity, we do not talk about the nation and we are not talking about the pride.”
“They see migration as an opportunity. The left-wing European intelligentsia was theoretically prepared. Now we are dealing with simplicity and power politics: All evidence and experience suggest that the overwhelming majority of these migrants will choose the political left once they are naturalised. So there are future voters left imported into Europe.
Meh. I guess he’s doing the best he can, but this is pretty lame. Yes, they will vote for policies that strip Whitey of his wealth, but that is simply a subsection of their racially-driven politics.
“The culture of debate, free exchange of views, of free speech is no longer necessarily part of the debate among us political leaders. Unfortunately, it is more and more rare in the public arena – that is in the media, in public opinion. Perhaps this is an effect of the migrant crisis: A free and honest exchange of views is becoming a smaller part of the culture of the European political elite. Everything is regulated, disciplined, and the orientation of each top politician corresponds to his political camp.
“The left side is in this respect in Europe is much more skilful than the [right]… Due to political correctness, the EU has turned into a kind of royal court, where everyone has to behave properly, this migration is an urgent challenge for us.
And the issue of voter apathy, or how European voters feel downtrodden by the quality of their leaders, arose:
“The European citizen is convinced that its leaders are not effective. But the migration crisis has produced a new impression. It has nothing to do with efficiency, but with democracy. Now it comes to the question: Who the hell decided that policy? Because when it comes to existential questions such as our identity or to protect against terrorists, you must discuss it with the citizens, and we should discuss it with them.”
“Who?” is the primary question here, yes.
He added, when asked if Greece should close its borders: “Yes, but the problem is that the Greeks do not want to do. For me it’s a great mystery why we accept this behaviour of the Greeks. Why do we not tell them: ‘Watch out, you are an EU member. We have helped you in your crisis, perhaps it wasn’t perfect, but we had the best intentions. You have a clear obligation, as far as you can. You have signed a contract called Schengen. Please do your job!’”
I am grateful that Orban says something. And it was very good when he attacked Jew Soros. But these latest statements are less than moving. He hints, but here he is almost hinting in the wrong direction.
I wish Jobbik would put more pressure on him with regards to the Jew problem, but much of the leadership of Jobbik itself appears to be confused about their own agenda.