Outrage: The LA Times Didn’t Print Anything I Said [UPDATED]

Andrew Anglin
Daily Stormer
June 24, 2015

UPDATE:

Matt wrote a second, better article – an actual interview!

Bravo!

I’m just going to imagine Jared Taylor made that comment about me with a wink!

Not really.
Not really. Most readers are just here to bootleg all of my Rare Pepes.

Following the Roof incident and especially following the SPLC conspiracy theory that Roof may have posted on this site, a bunch of journalists contacted me. I answered a couple little comments via email, but of those asking for a phone interview I decided only to respond to one.

I picked Matt Pearce of the LA Times because he didn’t appear to be Jewish and I found on his Twitter that we have similar tastes in sci-fi novels.

So I call the guy up, he’s friendly and cool and talks to me for about 40 minutes, lets me say everything I want to say. He’s a bit aloof, and I figure this is a good thing, a young, real guy who is likely to give me a fair shake.

Then what happens?

I see the article, which took a lot longer to go up than it should have, and it has – wonder of wonders – a co-author. A Ms. Tina Susman.

The LA Times did me Compton-style. I should have seen that one coming.
The LA Times did me Compton-style. I should have seen that one coming.

This was a simple article, which in no way needed two people to write it. What almost certainly happened was that Pearce wrote the article and then this woman re-wrote it and removed everything I said that mattered, replacing it with pseudo-incendiary out-of-context cherry-picked quotes from the website and comments from Ms. Heidi of the SPLC.

In particular, my statements about mass-shootings and SSRI drugs, which is covered up as part of a massive media conspiracy to please the multi-trillion dollar pharmaceutical industry, did not make it to print. Also, everything else important I said was removed, including clever comments about the Death Wish films.

Disappointing, to say the least.

But, to be expected.